* linux-next: build failure after merge of the fuse tree
@ 2010-05-26 1:44 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-26 6:46 ` Miklos Szeredi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-05-26 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miklos Szeredi; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 722 bytes --]
Hi Miklos,
After merging the fuse tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: "generic_pipe_buf_map" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "generic_pipe_buf_confirm" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "generic_pipe_buf_get" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "generic_pipe_buf_unmap" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "generic_pipe_buf_release" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit c3021629a0d820247ee12b6c5192a1d5380e21c6 ("fuse: support
splice() reading from fuse device").
I have used the version of the fuse tree from next-20100525 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the fuse tree
2010-05-26 1:44 linux-next: build failure after merge of the fuse tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-05-26 6:46 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-05-26 7:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2010-05-26 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: miklos, linux-next, linux-kernel
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the fuse tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "generic_pipe_buf_map" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "generic_pipe_buf_confirm" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "generic_pipe_buf_get" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "generic_pipe_buf_unmap" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "generic_pipe_buf_release" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit c3021629a0d820247ee12b6c5192a1d5380e21c6 ("fuse: support
> splice() reading from fuse device").
Oops, missed one patch, and forgot to test with modular kernel. It's
now fixed in the for-next branch.
Thanks for letting me know.
Miklos
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the fuse tree
2010-05-26 6:46 ` Miklos Szeredi
@ 2010-05-26 7:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-05-26 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miklos Szeredi; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 325 bytes --]
Hi Miklos,
On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:46:46 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
>
> Oops, missed one patch, and forgot to test with modular kernel. It's
> now fixed in the for-next branch.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the fuse tree
2022-10-12 23:15 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2022-10-13 8:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Szeredi @ 2022-10-13 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 01:15, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the fuse tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: modpost: ".delete_from_page_cache" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 0d659ac83481 ("fuse: fix readdir cache race")
>
> delete_from_page_cache has not been exported to modules since commit
>
> 452e9e6992fe ("filemap: Add filemap_remove_folio and __filemap_remove_folio")
>
> Which was merged into Linus tree in v5.17-rc1.
>
> I have used the fuse tree from next-20221012 for today.
>
> Is this really destined for v6.1?
This particular patch, yes. I posted the patch and asked Willy about
delete_from_page_cache().
Rebased my for-next branch on HEAD and re-added the EXPORT_SYMBOL to
fix this for now.
Thanks,
Miklos
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the fuse tree
@ 2022-10-12 23:15 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-13 8:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2022-10-12 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miklos Szeredi; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 587 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the fuse tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: modpost: ".delete_from_page_cache" [fs/fuse/fuse.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
0d659ac83481 ("fuse: fix readdir cache race")
delete_from_page_cache has not been exported to modules since commit
452e9e6992fe ("filemap: Add filemap_remove_folio and __filemap_remove_folio")
Which was merged into Linus tree in v5.17-rc1.
I have used the fuse tree from next-20221012 for today.
Is this really destined for v6.1?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the fuse tree
@ 2016-07-22 1:01 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2016-07-22 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miklos Szeredi
Cc: Chris Mason, Josef Bacik, David Sterba, linux-next, linux-kernel
Hi Miklos,
After merging the fuse tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/btrfs/file.c: In function 'btrfs_sync_file':
fs/btrfs/file.c:2043:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'btrfs_inode_check_errors' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
ret = btrfs_inode_check_errors(inode);
^
Caused by commit
7b9885f4acb2 ("mm: export filemap_check_errors() to modules")
interacting with commit
52c7064bb62a ("Btrfs: add missing check for writeback errors on fsync")
from the btrfs-kdave tree.
I applied the following merge fix patch and can carry it as necessary.
Someone needs to let Linus know about this when he meregs these trees.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:57:27 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: merge fix for "mm: export filemap_check_errors() to
modules"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 5842423f8f47..6c8b98cfee09 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -2040,7 +2040,7 @@ int btrfs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
* flags for any errors that might have happened while doing
* writeback of file data.
*/
- ret = btrfs_inode_check_errors(inode);
+ ret = filemap_check_errors(inode->i_mapping);
inode_unlock(inode);
goto out;
}
--
2.8.1
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-13 8:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-26 1:44 linux-next: build failure after merge of the fuse tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-26 6:46 ` Miklos Szeredi
2010-05-26 7:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-22 1:01 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-12 23:15 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-13 8:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).