From: Russell King <rmk@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm tree
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 23:19:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171128231959.GU8052@flint.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171129101637.1e4c7af3@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:16:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> After merging the arm tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning:
>
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:233: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:285: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:286: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S:365: Warning: conditional infixes are deprecated in unified syntax
>
> And many more similar.
>
> Presumably introduced by commit
>
> cabcafe5d1a5 ("ARM: 8723/1: always assume the "unified" syntax for assembly code")
Nicolas, was your patch tested? Is this another binutils weirdness?
Stephen, which binutils version are you using?
Thanks.
--
Russell King
ARM architecture Linux Kernel maintainer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 23:16 linux-next: build warning after merge of the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-28 23:19 ` Russell King [this message]
2017-11-28 23:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-28 23:41 ` Russell King
2017-11-29 6:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-11-28 23:31 ` Russell King
2017-11-28 23:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-18 8:25 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-18 18:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-11-18 19:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-18 19:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-04-22 0:32 Stephen Rothwell
2014-04-22 0:59 ` Sebastian Capella
2014-04-22 8:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-23 16:43 ` Sebastian Capella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171128231959.GU8052@flint.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).