linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 266 bytes --]

Hi Petr,

Commit

  503283fa006d ("printk: Add caller information to printk() output.")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Moreover, that patch appears twice in the tree (the other time properly
signed-off),

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

[Petr Mladek]

On Tue 2018-12-18 07:08:07, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Petr,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   503283fa006d ("printk: Add caller information to printk() output.")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
> 
> Moreover, that patch appears twice in the tree (the other time properly
> signed-off),

Thanks a lot for the report. I have fixed it.

Sigh, I guess that I left there the duplicated patch from testing.
It is pity that git did not complain. I need to be more careful.

Best Regards,
Petr

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 179 bytes --]

Hi all,

Commit

  bdb7f0530926 ("printk: Fix a typo in comment "interator"->"iterator"")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

[Petr Mladek]

On Thu 2020-05-21 08:04:56, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   bdb7f0530926 ("printk: Fix a typo in comment "interator"->"iterator"")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Thanks for catching this. It should be fixed now.

Best Regards,
Petr

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]

Hi all,

Commit

  4c31ead75f41 ("printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records")

is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

[Petr Mladek]

On Sat 2020-09-05 12:18:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   4c31ead75f41 ("printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Thanks for catching this. It should be fixed now.

It has been originally committed by Sergey. I rebased it to add the
missing SHA1[0] and suddenly became committer, see

I have just rebased it once again and added my newly required Signed-of-by.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200903091436.GA5012@alley/

Best Regards,
Petr

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (20/09/08 09:46), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Sat 2020-09-05 12:18:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Commit
> > 
> >   4c31ead75f41 ("printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records")
> > 
> > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
> 
> Thanks for catching this. It should be fixed now.
> 
> It has been originally committed by Sergey. I rebased it to add the
> missing SHA1[0] and suddenly became committer, see

Oh.
I missed it somehow that b4/git-am didn't add all the required fields.
That wasn't the only patch that I applied. So, well.. Sorry and thanks
for catching and fixing this up.

	-ss

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the printk tree

[Petr Mladek]

On Tue 2020-09-08 18:59:24, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (20/09/08 09:46), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Sat 2020-09-05 12:18:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Commit
> > > 
> > >   4c31ead75f41 ("printk: ringbuffer: support dataless records")
> > > 
> > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.
> > 
> > Thanks for catching this. It should be fixed now.
> > 
> > It has been originally committed by Sergey. I rebased it to add the
> > missing SHA1[0] and suddenly became committer, see
> 
> Oh.
> I missed it somehow that b4/git-am didn't add all the required fields.
> That wasn't the only patch that I applied. So, well.. Sorry and thanks
> for catching and fixing this up.

It was actually my mistake. I should have added my SOB when rebased
the commit.

Best Regards,
Petr