From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@gmail.com>,
Chester Lin <clin@suse.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm tree
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:04:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190911160404.GX13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190911142106.GA6429@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:21:07PM +0100, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:21:28PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > This is correctly signed off, but Mike didn't send the patch correctly.
> > It missed a From: line for the proper author, so the patch was committed
> > as if Mike had authored it, which he didn't.
>
> Sorry about that, haven't used the patch system for couple of years now.
> Would you like me to resubmit the patch?
No, I recommitted with the correct author. The patch system takes
standard formatted patches (in the format you'd send to the mailing
lists, complete with the From: header in the first line of the
description, as if you're passing a patch along from someone else)
with the exception of the KernelVersion: header which needs to appear
somewhere before the patch (which can be either body or header.)
>
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Commit
> > >
> > > 2505b9ba9c37 ("ARM: 8904/1: skip nomap memblocks while finding the lowmem/highmem boundary")
> > >
> > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> > According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.
>
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-10 14:14 linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-10 14:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-11 14:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-09-11 14:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-11 16:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-01-19 1:18 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-19 15:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-06-03 22:15 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-07 11:49 ` Russell King (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190911160404.GX13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=clin@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.rapoport@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).