Linux-Next Archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
* Coverity: intel_get_frame_time_us(): Integer handling issues
@ 2019-10-28 23:03 coverity-bot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: coverity-bot @ 2019-10-28 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Gupta; +Cc: Imre Deak, Gustavo A. R. Silva, linux-next


This is an experimental automated report about issues detected by Coverity
from a scan of next-20191025 as part of the linux-next weekly scan project:

You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified
lines of code (noted below) that were touched by recent commits:

1c4d821db919 ("drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness")

Coverity reported the following:

*** CID 1487370:  Integer handling issues  (DIVIDE_BY_ZERO)
/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c: 542 in intel_get_frame_time_us()
537     static u32 intel_get_frame_time_us(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
538     {
539     	if (!cstate || !cstate->
540     		return 0;
vvv     CID 1487370:  Integer handling issues  (DIVIDE_BY_ZERO)
vvv     In expression "(1000000 + drm_mode_vrefresh(&cstate->base.adjusted_mode) - 1) / drm_mode_vrefresh(&cstate->base.adjusted_mode)", division by expression "drm_mode_vrefresh(&cstate->base.adjusted_mode)" which may be zero has undefined behavior.
542     	return DIV_ROUND_UP(1000 * 1000,
543     			    drm_mode_vrefresh(&cstate->base.adjusted_mode));
544     }
546     static void psr2_program_idle_frames(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
547     				     u32 idle_frames)

If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as
such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make
sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please

Reported-by: coverity-bot <>
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1487370 ("Integer handling issues")
Fixes: 1c4d821db919 ("drm/i915/tgl: Switch between dc3co and dc5 based on display idleness")

Thanks for your attention!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, back to index

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-28 23:03 Coverity: intel_get_frame_time_us(): Integer handling issues coverity-bot

Linux-Next Archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror linux-next/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-next linux-next/ \
	public-inbox-index linux-next

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone