linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:24:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191115142432.GC32389@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191115092134.41f460b1@gandalf.local.home>

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 09:21:34AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:59:24 +0000
> Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> > I'm fine sending Linus the pull request with the conflict as long as you
> > and Mark are ok with Stephen's resolution. The only nitpick I have is
> > that the two comments prior to MCOUNT_REC should be merged into a single
> > block (I guess we can leave this to Linus to sort out out).
> 
> Agreed,
> 
> I pushed up the merge conflict resolution to:
> 
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git ftrace/aarch64-conflict
> 
> Feel free to point to that branch as a reference to the conflict
> resolution.

Great. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-15 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-15  2:53 linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-15 12:25 ` Mark Rutland
2019-11-15 13:48   ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-15 13:59     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-11-15 14:21       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-15 14:24         ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2019-11-25  2:31 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191115142432.GC32389@arrakis.emea.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).