linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:59:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716115944.7bc6de65@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 771 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  kernel/bpf/btf.c

between commit:

  5b801dfb7feb ("bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in __btf_resolve_helper_id()")

from the bpf tree and commit:

  138b9a0511c7 ("bpf: Remove btf_id helpers resolving")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (the latter removed the code fixed by the former) and can
carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-16  2:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-16  1:59 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-22  1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-08  3:11 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-08  3:02 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-29  1:29 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-29  8:28 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-26  3:12 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-26  5:45 ` Björn Töpel
2019-06-06  1:34 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-20  0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-20  0:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-02-20  0:45   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-02-20  1:03     ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-20  0:48   ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-02-20  3:03     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2018-12-14  0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-03  2:16 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-03  2:03 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-01  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-01  4:23 ` Yonghong Song
2018-07-26  1:19 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-26 15:32 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2018-01-09  0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-09  0:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200716115944.7bc6de65@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the bpf tree' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox