linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:34:46 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201013183446.654826bd@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200921180353.421484e8@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1851 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:03:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   0178dc761368 ("arm64: mte: Use Normal Tagged attributes for the linear map")
> 
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 
>   8e19cbb9528f ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()")
> 
> from the akpm-current tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 087a844b4d26,64211436629d..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@@ -493,21 -483,10 +494,15 @@@ static void __init map_mem(pgd_t *pgdp
>   #endif
>   
>   	/* map all the memory banks */
> - 	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
> - 		phys_addr_t start = reg->base;
> - 		phys_addr_t end = start + reg->size;
> - 
> + 	for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end) {
>   		if (start >= end)
>   			break;
> - 		if (memblock_is_nomap(reg))
> - 			continue;
> - 
>  -		__map_memblock(pgdp, start, end, PAGE_KERNEL, flags);
>  +		/*
>  +		 * The linear map must allow allocation tags reading/writing
>  +		 * if MTE is present. Otherwise, it has the same attributes as
>  +		 * PAGE_KERNEL.
>  +		 */
>  +		__map_memblock(pgdp, start, end, PAGE_KERNEL_TAGGED, flags);
>   	}
>   
>   	/*

This is now a conflict between the akpm-current tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-13  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-21  8:03 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-21  8:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-10-13  7:34 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-08  6:04 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-08  7:37 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-13  8:59 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-13  9:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-12-03  8:06 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-03 11:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-16  8:00 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-16  8:23 ` Will Deacon
2020-04-30  6:26 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-29  6:53 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-07  6:39 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-13  6:01 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-13 11:12 ` Will Deacon
2018-12-11  6:11 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the FIXME tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-11  6:12 ` linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-11 10:39   ` Will Deacon
2018-12-11  6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2018-09-24  4:38 Stephen Rothwell
2018-09-24  9:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-07-27 10:55 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-16  0:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-06  5:33 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27  6:03 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-22  4:54 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-16  5:01 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-16 10:14 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-23  7:23 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-23  8:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-24  8:42 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201013183446.654826bd@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).