linux-next: manual merge of the ecryptfs tree with the pidfd tree

linux-next: manual merge of the ecryptfs tree with the pidfd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1461 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the ecryptfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/ecryptfs/inode.c

between commit:

  c7c7a1a18af4 ("xattr: handle idmapped mounts")

from the pidfd tree and commit:

  0b964446c63f ("ecryptfs: fix uid translation for setxattr on security.capability")

from the ecryptfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
index 55da9a91f51a,58d0f7187997..000000000000
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
@@@ -1043,10 -1024,11 +1045,11 @@@ ecryptfs_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry
  		rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
  		goto out;
  	}
- 	rc = vfs_setxattr(&init_user_ns, lower_dentry, name, value, size,
- 			  flags);
+ 	inode_lock(lower_inode);
 -	rc = __vfs_setxattr_locked(lower_dentry, name, value, size, flags, NULL);
++	rc = __vfs_setxattr_locked(&init_user_ns, lower_dentry, name, value, size, flags, NULL);
+ 	inode_unlock(lower_inode);
  	if (!rc && inode)
- 		fsstack_copy_attr_all(inode, d_inode(lower_dentry));
+ 		fsstack_copy_attr_all(inode, lower_inode);
  out:
  	return rc;
  }

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]