linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Coverity: mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info(): Memory - illegal accesses
@ 2022-12-02 22:24 coverity-bot
  2022-12-02 22:56 ` Ryder Lee
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: coverity-bot @ 2022-12-02 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bo Jiao
  Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi, linux-wireless, Jakub Kicinski, Kalle Valo,
	Matthias Brugger, Shayne Chen, Eric Dumazet, linux-arm-kernel,
	netdev, linux-mediatek, Felix Fietkau, David S. Miller,
	linux-kernel, Paolo Abeni, Sean Wang, MeiChia Chiu, Ryder Lee,
	Sujuan Chen, Bo Jiao, Gustavo A. R. Silva, linux-next,
	linux-hardening

Hello!

This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by
Coverity from a scan of next-20221202 as part of the linux-next scan project:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan

You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified
lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits:

  Thu Feb 3 13:57:56 2022 +0100
    417a4534d223 ("mt76: mt7915: update mt7915_chan_mib_offs for mt7916")

Coverity reported the following:

*** CID 1527801:  Memory - illegal accesses  (OVERRUN)
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mcu.c:3005 in mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info()
2999     		start = 5;
3000     		ofs = 0;
3001     	}
3002
3003     	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
3004     		req[i].band = cpu_to_le32(phy->mt76->band_idx);
vvv     CID 1527801:  Memory - illegal accesses  (OVERRUN)
vvv     Overrunning array "offs" of 9 4-byte elements at element index 9 (byte offset 39) using index "i + start" (which evaluates to 9).
3005     		req[i].offs = cpu_to_le32(offs[i + start]);
3006
3007     		if (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3)
3008     			break;
3009     	}
3010

If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as
such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make
sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please
include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first):

Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@chromium.org>
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1527801 ("Memory - illegal accesses")
Fixes: 417a4534d223 ("mt76: mt7915: update mt7915_chan_mib_offs for mt7916")

Thanks for your attention!

-- 
Coverity-bot

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Coverity: mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info(): Memory - illegal accesses
  2022-12-02 22:24 Coverity: mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info(): Memory - illegal accesses coverity-bot
@ 2022-12-02 22:56 ` Ryder Lee
  2022-12-02 23:04   ` Kees Cook
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ryder Lee @ 2022-12-02 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: keescook, Bo Jiao (焦波)
  Cc: MeiChia Chiu (邱美嘉),
	linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, gustavo, linux-hardening,
	Shayne Chen (陳軒丞),
	nbd, lorenzo, kuba, Sean Wang, kvalo, edumazet,
	Sujuan Chen (陈素娟),
	pabeni, linux-arm-kernel, netdev, linux-next, matthias.bgg,
	davem, linux-wireless

On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 14:24 -0800, coverity-bot wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected
> by
> Coverity from a scan of next-20221202 as part of the linux-next scan
> project:
> 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!j7j_C0KpO4VD2yMOodvpeIexTGq4fhy2yq6nokNua9u4LToiUOLk4ou8JFFNrXkrh80d5BK2k44faRQstHE9$ 
>  
> 
> You're getting this email because you were associated with the
> identified
> lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits:
> 
>   Thu Feb 3 13:57:56 2022 +0100
>     417a4534d223 ("mt76: mt7915: update mt7915_chan_mib_offs for
> mt7916")
> 
> Coverity reported the following:
> 
> *** CID 1527801:  Memory - illegal accesses  (OVERRUN)
> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mcu.c:3005 in
> mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info()
> 2999     		start = 5;
> 3000     		ofs = 0;
> 3001     	}
> 3002
> 3003     	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> 3004     		req[i].band = cpu_to_le32(phy->mt76->band_idx);
> vvv     CID 1527801:  Memory - illegal accesses  (OVERRUN)
> vvv     Overrunning array "offs" of 9 4-byte elements at element
> index 9 (byte offset 39) using index "i + start" (which evaluates to
> 9).
> 3005     		req[i].offs = cpu_to_le32(offs[i + start]);
> 3006
> 3007     		if (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3)
> 3008     			break;
> 3009     	}
> 3010
> 
> If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as
> such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make
> sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please
> include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first):
> 

I think this is a false postive as the subsequent check 'if
(!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3)' should break array "offs" of 8.

Ryder

> Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@chromium.org>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1527801 ("Memory - illegal accesses")
> Fixes: 417a4534d223 ("mt76: mt7915: update mt7915_chan_mib_offs for
> mt7916")
> 
> Thanks for your attention!
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Coverity: mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info(): Memory - illegal accesses
  2022-12-02 22:56 ` Ryder Lee
@ 2022-12-02 23:04   ` Kees Cook
  2022-12-02 23:42     ` Ryder Lee
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2022-12-02 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ryder Lee
  Cc: Bo Jiao (焦波),
	MeiChia Chiu (邱美嘉),
	linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, gustavo, linux-hardening,
	Shayne Chen (陳軒丞),
	nbd, lorenzo, kuba, Sean Wang, kvalo, edumazet,
	Sujuan Chen (陈素娟),
	pabeni, linux-arm-kernel, netdev, linux-next, matthias.bgg,
	davem, linux-wireless

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 10:56:19PM +0000, Ryder Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 14:24 -0800, coverity-bot wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected
> > by
> > Coverity from a scan of next-20221202 as part of the linux-next scan
> > project:
> > 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!j7j_C0KpO4VD2yMOodvpeIexTGq4fhy2yq6nokNua9u4LToiUOLk4ou8JFFNrXkrh80d5BK2k44faRQstHE9$ 
> >  
> > 
> > You're getting this email because you were associated with the
> > identified
> > lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits:
> > 
> >   Thu Feb 3 13:57:56 2022 +0100
> >     417a4534d223 ("mt76: mt7915: update mt7915_chan_mib_offs for
> > mt7916")
> > 
> > Coverity reported the following:
> > 
> > *** CID 1527801:  Memory - illegal accesses  (OVERRUN)
> > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mcu.c:3005 in
> > mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info()
> > 2999     		start = 5;
> > 3000     		ofs = 0;
> > 3001     	}
> > 3002
> > 3003     	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> > 3004     		req[i].band = cpu_to_le32(phy->mt76->band_idx);
> > vvv     CID 1527801:  Memory - illegal accesses  (OVERRUN)
> > vvv     Overrunning array "offs" of 9 4-byte elements at element
> > index 9 (byte offset 39) using index "i + start" (which evaluates to
> > 9).
> > 3005     		req[i].offs = cpu_to_le32(offs[i + start]);
> > 3006
> > 3007     		if (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3)
> > 3008     			break;
> > 3009     	}
> > 3010
> > 
> > If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as
> > such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make
> > sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please
> > include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first):
> > 
> 
> I think this is a false postive as the subsequent check 'if
> (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3)' should break array "offs" of 8.

Ah, okay. What if is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) is always true?

-Kees

> 
> Ryder
> 
> > Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook+coverity-bot@chromium.org>
> > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1527801 ("Memory - illegal accesses")
> > Fixes: 417a4534d223 ("mt76: mt7915: update mt7915_chan_mib_offs for
> > mt7916")
> > 
> > Thanks for your attention!
> > 

-- 
Kees Cook

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Coverity: mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info(): Memory - illegal accesses
  2022-12-02 23:04   ` Kees Cook
@ 2022-12-02 23:42     ` Ryder Lee
  2022-12-03  2:17       ` Kees Cook
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ryder Lee @ 2022-12-02 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: keescook
  Cc: MeiChia Chiu (邱美嘉),
	linux-kernel, gustavo, linux-mediatek, linux-hardening,
	Shayne Chen (陳軒丞),
	nbd, lorenzo, kuba, Sean Wang, kvalo, edumazet,
	Sujuan Chen (陈素娟),
	pabeni, linux-arm-kernel, netdev, linux-next, matthias.bgg,
	davem, Bo Jiao (焦波),
	linux-wireless

On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 15:04 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > 
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 10:56:19PM +0000, Ryder Lee wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 14:24 -0800, coverity-bot wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > > 
> > > This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues
> > > detected
> > > by
> > > Coverity from a scan of next-20221202 as part of the linux-next
> > > scan
> > > project:
> > > 
> > 
> > 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!j7j_C0KpO4VD2yMOodvpeIexTGq4fhy2yq6nokNua9u4LToiUOLk4ou8JFFNrXkrh80d5BK2k44faRQstHE9$
> >  
> > >  
> > > 
> > > You're getting this email because you were associated with the
> > > identified
> > > lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits:
> > > 
> > >   Thu Feb 3 13:57:56 2022 +0100
> > >     417a4534d223 ("mt76: mt7915: update mt7915_chan_mib_offs for
> > > mt7916")
> > > 
> > > Coverity reported the following:
> > > 
> > > *** CID 1527801:  Memory - illegal accesses  (OVERRUN)
> > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mcu.c:3005 in
> > > mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info()
> > > 2999     		start = 5;
> > > 3000     		ofs = 0;
> > > 3001     	}
> > > 3002
> > > 3003     	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> > > 3004     		req[i].band = cpu_to_le32(phy->mt76->band_idx);
> > > vvv     CID 1527801:  Memory - illegal accesses  (OVERRUN)
> > > vvv     Overrunning array "offs" of 9 4-byte elements at element
> > > index 9 (byte offset 39) using index "i + start" (which evaluates
> > > to
> > > 9).
> > > 3005     		req[i].offs = cpu_to_le32(offs[i + start]);
> > > 3006
> > > 3007     		if (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3)
> > > 3008     			break;
> > > 3009     	}
> > > 3010
> > > 
> > > If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it
> > > as
> > > such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please
> > > make
> > > sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this,
> > > please
> > > include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first):
> > > 
> > 
> > I think this is a false postive as the subsequent check 'if
> > (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3)' should break array "offs" of 8.
> 
> Ah, okay. What if is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) is always true?
> 
> -Kees

	int start = 0;

	if (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76)) {
		start = 5;
		ofs = 0;
	}

	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
		req[i].band = cpu_to_le32(phy->band_idx);
		req[i].offs = cpu_to_le32(offs[i + start]);

		if (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3) //
			break;
	}

For 'is_mt7915' case, start:0 and i: 0 1 2 3 4, whereas !is_mt7915'
case, start:5 and i: 0 1 2 3 (then break).

I know it's a bit tricky. This is used to differentiate chipset
revision.

Ryder

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Coverity: mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info(): Memory - illegal accesses
  2022-12-02 23:42     ` Ryder Lee
@ 2022-12-03  2:17       ` Kees Cook
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2022-12-03  2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ryder Lee
  Cc: MeiChia Chiu (邱美嘉),
	linux-kernel, gustavo, linux-mediatek, linux-hardening,
	Shayne Chen (陳軒丞),
	nbd, lorenzo, kuba, Sean Wang, kvalo, edumazet,
	Sujuan Chen (陈素娟),
	pabeni, linux-arm-kernel, netdev, linux-next, matthias.bgg,
	davem, Bo Jiao (焦波),
	linux-wireless

On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 11:42:36PM +0000, Ryder Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 15:04 -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > 
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 10:56:19PM +0000, Ryder Lee wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 14:24 -0800, coverity-bot wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > > 
> > > > This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues
> > > > detected
> > > > by
> > > > Coverity from a scan of next-20221202 as part of the linux-next
> > > > scan
> > > > project:
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!j7j_C0KpO4VD2yMOodvpeIexTGq4fhy2yq6nokNua9u4LToiUOLk4ou8JFFNrXkrh80d5BK2k44faRQstHE9$
> > >  
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > You're getting this email because you were associated with the
> > > > identified
> > > > lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits:
> > > > 
> > > >   Thu Feb 3 13:57:56 2022 +0100
> > > >     417a4534d223 ("mt76: mt7915: update mt7915_chan_mib_offs for
> > > > mt7916")
> > > > 
> > > > Coverity reported the following:
> > > > 
> > > > *** CID 1527801:  Memory - illegal accesses  (OVERRUN)
> > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mcu.c:3005 in
> > > > mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info()
> > > > 2999     		start = 5;
> > > > 3000     		ofs = 0;
> > > > 3001     	}
> > > > 3002
> > > > 3003     	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> > > > 3004     		req[i].band = cpu_to_le32(phy->mt76->band_idx);
> > > > vvv     CID 1527801:  Memory - illegal accesses  (OVERRUN)
> > > > vvv     Overrunning array "offs" of 9 4-byte elements at element
> > > > index 9 (byte offset 39) using index "i + start" (which evaluates
> > > > to
> > > > 9).
> > > > 3005     		req[i].offs = cpu_to_le32(offs[i + start]);
> > > > 3006
> > > > 3007     		if (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3)
> > > > 3008     			break;
> > > > 3009     	}
> > > > 3010
> > > > 
> > > > If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it
> > > > as
> > > > such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please
> > > > make
> > > > sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this,
> > > > please
> > > > include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first):
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I think this is a false postive as the subsequent check 'if
> > > (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3)' should break array "offs" of 8.
> > 
> > Ah, okay. What if is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) is always true?
> > 
> > -Kees
> 
> 	int start = 0;
> 
> 	if (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76)) {
> 		start = 5;
> 		ofs = 0;
> 	}
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> 		req[i].band = cpu_to_le32(phy->band_idx);
> 		req[i].offs = cpu_to_le32(offs[i + start]);
> 
> 		if (!is_mt7915(&dev->mt76) && i == 3) //
> 			break;
> 	}
> 
> For 'is_mt7915' case, start:0 and i: 0 1 2 3 4, whereas !is_mt7915'
> case, start:5 and i: 0 1 2 3 (then break).
> 
> I know it's a bit tricky. This is used to differentiate chipset
> revision.

Ah-ha! Gotcha now. Thanks for the details and sorry for the noise! :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-03  2:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-12-02 22:24 Coverity: mt7915_mcu_get_chan_mib_info(): Memory - illegal accesses coverity-bot
2022-12-02 22:56 ` Ryder Lee
2022-12-02 23:04   ` Kees Cook
2022-12-02 23:42     ` Ryder Lee
2022-12-03  2:17       ` Kees Cook

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).