linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with the mm tree
@ 2023-09-18  0:10 Stephen Rothwell
  2023-09-18  1:28 ` Baoquan He
  2023-11-02 21:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2023-09-18  0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann, Andrew Morton
  Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, Baoquan He, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 762 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in:

  arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c

between commit:

  52f40d9a3c11 ("crash_core: change the prototype of function parse_crashkernel()")

from the mm tree and commit:

  cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")

from the asm-generic tree.

I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with the mm tree
  2023-09-18  0:10 linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with the mm tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2023-09-18  1:28 ` Baoquan He
  2023-11-02 21:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Baoquan He @ 2023-09-18  1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Andrew Morton, Ard Biesheuvel,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

On 09/18/23 at 10:10am, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   52f40d9a3c11 ("crash_core: change the prototype of function parse_crashkernel()")

Thanks a lot for fixing the conflict. I rebased the crash_core
refactoring code on linus's tree, so didn't notice ia64 arch has been
removed in next tree.

> 
> from the mm tree and commit:
> 
>   cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")
> 
> from the asm-generic tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with the mm tree
  2023-09-18  0:10 linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with the mm tree Stephen Rothwell
  2023-09-18  1:28 ` Baoquan He
@ 2023-11-02 21:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2023-11-02 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Ard Biesheuvel, Baoquan He,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 964 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:10:27 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   52f40d9a3c11 ("crash_core: change the prototype of function parse_crashkernel()")
> 
> from the mm tree and commit:
> 
>   cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")
> 
> from the asm-generic tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the mm-nonmm-stable tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with the mm tree
  2023-12-04 22:05 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2024-01-10 22:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-01-10 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann, Andrew Morton
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2204 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 09:05:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/mips/include/asm/traps.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   6b281b05cbcc ("mips: add missing declarations for trap handlers")
> 
> from the mm tree and commit:
> 
>   23f8c1823bd4 ("arch: add do_page_fault prototypes")
> 
> from the asm-generic tree.
> 
> 
> diff --cc arch/mips/include/asm/traps.h
> index 2c2b26f1e464,d4d9f8a8fdea..000000000000
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/traps.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/traps.h
> @@@ -39,28 -39,7 +39,30 @@@ extern char except_vec_nmi[]
>   	register_nmi_notifier(&fn##_nb);				\
>   })
>   
>  +asmlinkage void do_ade(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_be(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_ov(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_fpe(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long fcr31);
>  +asmlinkage void do_bp(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_tr(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_ri(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_cpu(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_msa_fpe(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int msacsr);
>  +asmlinkage void do_msa(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_mdmx(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_watch(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_mcheck(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_mt(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_dsp(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_reserved(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void do_ftlb(void);
>  +asmlinkage void do_gsexc(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 diag1);
>  +asmlinkage void do_daddi_ov(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +
>  +asmlinkage void cache_parity_error(void);
>  +asmlinkage void ejtag_exception_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  +asmlinkage void __noreturn nmi_exception_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> + asmlinkage void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
> + 	unsigned long write, unsigned long address);
>   
>   #endif /* _ASM_TRAPS_H */

This is now a conflict between the asm-generic tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with the mm tree
@ 2023-12-04 22:05 Stephen Rothwell
  2024-01-10 22:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2023-12-04 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann, Andrew Morton
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2321 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in:

  arch/mips/include/asm/traps.h

between commit:

  6b281b05cbcc ("mips: add missing declarations for trap handlers")

from the mm tree and commit:

  23f8c1823bd4 ("arch: add do_page_fault prototypes")

from the asm-generic tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/mips/include/asm/traps.h
index 2c2b26f1e464,d4d9f8a8fdea..000000000000
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/traps.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/traps.h
@@@ -39,28 -39,7 +39,30 @@@ extern char except_vec_nmi[]
  	register_nmi_notifier(&fn##_nb);				\
  })
  
 +asmlinkage void do_ade(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_be(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_ov(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_fpe(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long fcr31);
 +asmlinkage void do_bp(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_tr(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_ri(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_cpu(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_msa_fpe(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int msacsr);
 +asmlinkage void do_msa(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_mdmx(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_watch(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_mcheck(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_mt(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_dsp(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_reserved(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void do_ftlb(void);
 +asmlinkage void do_gsexc(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 diag1);
 +asmlinkage void do_daddi_ov(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +
 +asmlinkage void cache_parity_error(void);
 +asmlinkage void ejtag_exception_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
 +asmlinkage void __noreturn nmi_exception_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
+ asmlinkage void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
+ 	unsigned long write, unsigned long address);
  
  #endif /* _ASM_TRAPS_H */

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-10 22:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-18  0:10 linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with the mm tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-18  1:28 ` Baoquan He
2023-11-02 21:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-12-04 22:05 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-10 22:22 ` Stephen Rothwell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).