linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:06:56 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222100656.0a644254@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 754 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
failed like this:

util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:15: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct timespec64'
        __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
                     ^     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/bpf_skel/augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c:329:29: note: forward declaration of 'struct timespec64'
        __u32 size = sizeof(struct timespec64);
                                   ^

Caused by commit

  29d16de26df1 ("perf augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf: Move 'struct timespec64' to vmlinux.h")

This is a ppc64 le build.

I have used the perf tree from next-20240221 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21 23:06 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2024-02-23 19:50 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-23 20:11   ` [solved] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-23 20:34     ` Namhyung Kim
2024-02-24 15:05       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-01 22:41 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-02 20:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-12 15:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-13  2:43   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 21:41 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 23:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:19   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:32     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-22  2:13       ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-22 14:32         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:36   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 23:40     ` arnaldo.melo
2024-03-21 23:48     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-06 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-07  0:02 ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-24 23:26 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-25  0:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-05-29 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30  2:16 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-16 22:50 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-16 23:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-16 23:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-17  3:23     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-21 21:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-22 18:37   ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-22 22:54     ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-23 13:27       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-27 20:31         ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-28  1:33         ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-28 19:47           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-28 23:06             ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-29 12:28               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-04-03  5:15                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-30 22:34 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-01  5:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-06 19:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-07  2:31   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-07  3:00     ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-07  4:22       ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 15:21         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-20 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21  2:35 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-21  3:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21  5:33     ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-05 22:19 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-07  8:58 ` kajoljain
2022-01-11 21:45   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-11 22:01     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-12  5:30       ` kajoljain
2022-01-12  6:16       ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 12:03       ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240222100656.0a644254@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).