linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 20:18:00 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfzAKMlYY7IkWXUg@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240322084131.2316eb8f@canb.auug.org.au>

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 08:41:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the perf tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
> failed like this:
> 
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target '/home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/uapi/linux/stat.h', needed by '/home/sfr/next/perf/libbpf/staticobjs/libbpf.o'.  Stop.
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   f122b3d6d179 ("perf beauty: Introduce scrape script for the 'statx' syscall 'mask' argument")
> 
> Are all these new commits today really destined for the current merge
> window?
> 
> I have used the perf tree from next-20240321 for today.

Ok, maybe I opened perf-tools-next for the next merge window too early?

For this merge window I think Namhyung is switching to perf-tools,
right?

From your reaction I think I made a mistake and should have opened
perf-tools-next for v6.10 stuff only when the v6.9-rc1 gets released...

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-21 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-21 21:41 linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 23:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2024-03-21 23:19   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:32     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-22  2:13       ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-22 14:32         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:36   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 23:40     ` arnaldo.melo
2024-03-21 23:48     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-01 22:41 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-02 20:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-12 15:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-13  2:43   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-21 23:06 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-23 19:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-06 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-07  0:02 ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-24 23:26 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-25  0:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-05-29 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30  2:16 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-16 22:50 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-16 23:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-16 23:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-17  3:23     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-21 21:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-22 18:37   ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-22 22:54     ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-23 13:27       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-27 20:31         ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-28  1:33         ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-28 19:47           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-28 23:06             ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-29 12:28               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-04-03  5:15                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-30 22:34 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-01  5:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-06 19:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-07  2:31   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-07  3:00     ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-07  4:22       ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 15:21         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-20 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21  2:35 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-21  3:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21  5:33     ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-05 22:19 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-07  8:58 ` kajoljain
2022-01-11 21:45   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-11 22:01     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-12  5:30       ` kajoljain
2022-01-12  6:16       ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 12:03       ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZfzAKMlYY7IkWXUg@x1 \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).