linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 14 (insn_decoder_test)
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:04:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fe0f2d7-eab6-8224-bc48-ef513c7ce8e3@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023144916.2cbd0ea16363b4cd4574f5ad@kernel.org>

On 10/22/19 10:49 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:30:02 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 10/13/19 11:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20191011:
>>>
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>>   HOSTCC  arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test
>>   HOSTCC  arch/x86/tools/insn_sanity
>>   TEST    posttest
>> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: Found an x86 instruction decoder bug, please report this.
>> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: ffffffff81000bf1:	f7 0b 00 01 08 00    	testl  $0x80100,(%rbx)
>> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: objdump says 6 bytes, but insn_get_length() says 2
>> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: Decoded and checked 11913894 instructions with 1 failures
>>   TEST    posttest
>> arch/x86/tools/insn_sanity: Success: decoded and checked 1000000 random instructions with 0 errors (seed:0x871ce29c)
> 
> Hmm, curious.
> 
> x86-opcode-map.txt said,
> f7: Grp3_2 Ev (1A)
> 
> and "0x0b" is 00001011b, Group encoding bits are 5,4,3 (reg field),
> so group index is 001.
> 
> GrpTable: Grp3_2
> 0: TEST Ev,Iz
> 1:
> 
> Hmm, "f7 0b" is not assigned to any instruction... (testl should be f7 03)
> 
> I've checked Intel SDM May 2019 version(*), but the Opcode Map (Table A-6. Opecode
> Extensions for One- and Two-byte Opecodes by Group Number) showed the group index
> 001 is still blank. I've also checked that Table B-13 (General Purpose Instruction
>  Formats and Encodings for Non-64-Bit Modes (Note that this has no REX prefix)) but
> I couldn't find "f7 0b".
> 
> At last, I found that on AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 3, Appendix A.2
> Table A-6. ModRM.reg Extensions for the Primary Opcode Map(**), which shows that both
> f7 + reg=000 and f7 + reg=001 are same. So only on AMD64, it is officially available
> instruction.
> 
> (*) https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/a4/60/325383-sdm-vol-2abcd.pdf
> (**) https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/24594.pdf
> 
> OK, so this should be fixed with below patch.
> 
> ------
>>From b3f45b86df25be59fcf417730ab4c69c6310eaad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:45:35 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/decoder: Add TEST opcode to Group3-2
> 
> Add TEST opcode to Group3-2 reg=001b as same as Group3-1 does.
> 
> Commit 12a78d43de76 ("x86/decoder: Add new TEST instruction pattern")
> added a TEST opcode assignment to f6 XX/001/XXX (Group 3-1), but not
> added f7 XX/001/XXX (Group 3-2). Actually these TEST opcode is not
> described in Intel SDM Vol2, but described in AMD64 Architecture
> Programmer's Manual Vol.3, Appendix A.2 Table A-6. ModRM.reg
> Extensions for the Primary Opcode Map.
> 
> Without this fix, Randy found a warning by insn_decoder_test related
> to this issue as below.
> 
>   HOSTCC  arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test
>   HOSTCC  arch/x86/tools/insn_sanity
>   TEST    posttest
> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: Found an x86 instruction decoder bug, please report this.
> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: ffffffff81000bf1:	f7 0b 00 01 08 00    	testl  $0x80100,(%rbx)
> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: objdump says 6 bytes, but insn_get_length() says 2
> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: Decoded and checked 11913894 instructions with 1 failures
>   TEST    posttest
> arch/x86/tools/insn_sanity: Success: decoded and checked 1000000 random instructions with 0 errors (seed:0x871ce29c)
> 
> To fix this error, add TEST opcode according to AMD64 APM Vol.3.
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
>  arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt       | 2 +-
>  tools/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt b/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> index e0b85930dd77..4635ce298d1d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> @@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ EndTable
>  
>  GrpTable: Grp3_2
>  0: TEST Ev,Iz
> -1:
> +1: TEST Ev,Iz
>  2: NOT Ev
>  3: NEG Ev
>  4: MUL rAX,Ev
> diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt b/tools/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> index e0b85930dd77..4635ce298d1d 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> +++ b/tools/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
> @@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ EndTable
>  
>  GrpTable: Grp3_2
>  0: TEST Ev,Iz
> -1:
> +1: TEST Ev,Iz
>  2: NOT Ev
>  3: NEG Ev
>  4: MUL rAX,Ev
> 


-- 
~Randy


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-28  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-14  6:47 linux-next: Tree for Oct 14 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-14 15:05 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 14 (sound/soc/sof/) Randy Dunlap
2019-10-14 15:30 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 14 (insn_decoder_test) Randy Dunlap
2019-10-23  5:49   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-11-28  0:04     ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2020-01-21 15:43       ` Randy Dunlap
2020-01-22  3:11         ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3fe0f2d7-eab6-8224-bc48-ef513c7ce8e3@infradead.org \
    --to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).