linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the x86 tree with Linus' tree
@ 2009-05-26  0:52 Stephen Rothwell
  2009-05-26  0:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-05-26  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 580 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the x86 tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/boot/memory.c between commit
bca23dba760d6705c013f89113c46570378fb626 ("x86, setup: revert ACPI 3 E820
extended attributes support") from Linus' tree and commit
df7699c56421c0476704f24a43409ac8c505f3d2 ("x86, setup: "glove box" BIOS
interrupts in the core boot code") from the x86 tree.

The former removed the code that the latter modified, so I used the
former (as is done in -tip).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the x86 tree with Linus' tree
  2009-05-26  0:52 linux-next: manual merge of the x86 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-05-26  0:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2009-05-26  0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, linux-next, linux-kernel

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the x86 tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/boot/memory.c between commit
> bca23dba760d6705c013f89113c46570378fb626 ("x86, setup: revert ACPI 3 E820
> extended attributes support") from Linus' tree and commit
> df7699c56421c0476704f24a43409ac8c505f3d2 ("x86, setup: "glove box" BIOS
> interrupts in the core boot code") from the x86 tree.
> 
> The former removed the code that the latter modified, so I used the
> former (as is done in -tip).

tip:x86/setup should contain a proper merge between the two.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the x86 tree with Linus' tree
@ 2009-02-24  1:21 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-02-24  1:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-next

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1043 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the x86 tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c between commit
936577c61d0c10b8929608a92c98d839b22053bc ("x86: Add IRQF_TIMER to legacy
x86 timer interrupt descriptors") from Linus' tree and commit
6bda2c8b32febeb38ee128047253751e080bad52 ("x86: remove subarchitecture
support") from the x86 tree.

I fixed it up by removing arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c and applying the
following patch (I am not sure if that is all that is necessary) and can
carry this for a while.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/probe_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/probe_32.c
index 22337b7..31493c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/probe_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/probe_32.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ void __init trap_init_hook(void)
 
 static struct irqaction irq0  = {
 	.handler = timer_interrupt,
-	.flags = IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_IRQPOLL,
+	.flags = IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_IRQPOLL | IRQF_TIMER,
 	.mask = CPU_MASK_NONE,
 	.name = "timer"
 };

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-26  0:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-26  0:52 linux-next: manual merge of the x86 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-26  0:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-24  1:21 Stephen Rothwell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).