From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2022 16:55:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6054083.7yRespAWZ4@silver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y45zsz71RfXbySDq@codewreck.org>
On Monday, December 5, 2022 11:41:55 PM CET Dominique Martinet wrote:
> Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 09:40:06PM +0100:
> > Dominique, looking at your 9p queue, I just realized what happened here: I
> > posted a v2 of these two patches, which got lost for some reason:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1669144861.git.linux_oss@crudebyte.com/
> >
> > The currently queued 1st patch is still v1 as well.
>
> Oh. Now how did I manage that one..
> Thanks for the catch, and v2 had the valid printf modifier...
You remember updating the 1st patch as well, right? :)
In general, I'm sure nobody complains about extra noise like "queued on...".
Then it's also more likely for other people to get which patches are still
pending or unseen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-08 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 4:03 linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-05 4:10 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-12-05 4:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-12-05 14:31 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-12-05 20:40 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-12-05 22:41 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-12-08 15:55 ` Christian Schoenebeck [this message]
2022-12-08 23:53 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-12-09 14:40 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-12-09 21:24 ` Dominique Martinet
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-13 1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13 1:06 ` Dominique Martinet
2011-12-01 1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-01 16:57 ` Joe Perches
2011-02-22 0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-22 5:20 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-22 5:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-22 6:22 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
2011-02-22 14:57 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2011-02-22 16:48 ` Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6054083.7yRespAWZ4@silver \
--to=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).