linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: naresh kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	the hoang0709 <the_hoang0709@yahoo.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrubis@suse.cz,
	alexey kodanev <alexey.kodanev@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Linux-next-20190823: x86_64/i386: prot_hsymlinks.c:325: Failed to run cmd: useradd hsym
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 06:25:36 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <866876796.8349197.1566901536625.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <566e862d9bfaf88cdde6d66f0f59033fe6225a22.camel@hammerspace.com>


----- Original Message -----
> On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 19:12 -0400, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 10:38 -0400, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > Hi Jan and Cyril,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 16:35, Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > > > > Do you see this LTP prot_hsymlinks failure on linux next
> > > > > > > > 20190823 on
> > > > > > > > x86_64 and i386 devices?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > test output log,
> > > > > > > > useradd: failure while writing changes to /etc/passwd
> > > > > > > > useradd: /home/hsym was created, but could not be removed
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This looks like an unrelated problem, failure to write to
> > > > > > > /etc/passwd
> > > > > > > probably means that filesystem is full or some problem
> > > > > > > happend
> > > > > > > and how
> > > > > > > is remounted RO.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > In Naresh' example, root is on NFS:
> > > > > >   root=/dev/nfs rw
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > nfsroot=10.66.16.123:/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/886412/extr
> > > > > > act-
> > > > > > nfsrootfs-tyuevoxm,tcp,hard,intr
> > > > > 
> > > > > Right !
> > > > > root is mounted on NFS.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 10.66.16.123:/var/lib/lava/dispatcher/tmp/886412/extract-
> > > > > > nfsrootfs-tyuevoxm
> > > > > > on / type nfs
> > > > > > (rw,relatime,vers=2,rsize=4096,wsize=4096,namlen=255,hard,nol
> > > > > > ock,
> > > > > > proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=10.66.16.123,
> > > > > > moun
> > > > > > tvers=1,mountproto=tcp,local_lock=all,addr=10.66.16.123)
> > > > > > devtmpfs on /dev type devtmpfs
> > > > > > (rw,relatime,size=3977640k,nr_inodes=994410,mode=755)
> > > > > > 
> > > 
> > > The only thing I can think of that might cause an EIO on NFSv2
> > > would be
> > > this patch
> > > http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=trondmy/linux-nfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=627d48e597ec5993c4abb3b81dc75e554a07c7c0
> > > assuming that a bind-related error is leaking through.
> > > 
> > > I'd suggest something like the following to fix it up:
> > 
> > No change with that patch,
> > but following one fixes it for me:
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
> > index 20b3717cd7ca..56cefa0ab804 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/pagelist.c
> > @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static void nfs_pgio_rpcsetup(struct
> > nfs_pgio_header *hdr,
> >         }
> >  
> >         hdr->res.fattr   = &hdr->fattr;
> > -       hdr->res.count   = 0;
> > +       hdr->res.count   = count;
> >         hdr->res.eof     = 0;
> >         hdr->res.verf    = &hdr->verf;
> >         nfs_fattr_init(&hdr->fattr);
> > 
> > which is functionally revert of "NFS: Fix initialisation of I/O
> > result struct in nfs_pgio_rpcsetup".
> > 
> > This hunk caught my eye, could res.eof == 0 explain those I/O errors?
> 
> Interesting hypothesis. It could if res.count ends up being 0. So does
> the following also fix the problem?

It didn't fix it.

That theory is probably not correct for this case, since EIO I see appears
to originate from write and nfs_writeback_result(). This function also
produces message we saw in logs from Naresh.

I can't find where/how is resp->count updated on WRITE reply in NFSv2.
Issue also goes away with patch below, though I can't speak about its correctness:

NFS version     Type    Test    Return code
nfsvers=2       tcp     -b:base         0
nfsvers=2       tcp     -g:general      0
nfsvers=2       tcp     -s:special      0
nfsvers=2       tcp     -l:lock         0
Total time: 141

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs2xdr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs2xdr.c
index cbc17a203248..4913c6da270b 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs2xdr.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs2xdr.c
@@ -897,6 +897,16 @@ static int nfs2_xdr_dec_writeres(struct rpc_rqst *req, struct xdr_stream *xdr,
                                 void *data)
 {
        struct nfs_pgio_res *result = data;
+       struct rpc_task *rq_task  = req->rq_task;
+
+       if (rq_task) {
+               struct nfs_pgio_args *args = rq_task->tk_msg.rpc_argp;
+
+               if (args) {
+                       result->count = args->count;
+               }
+       }
 
        /* All NFSv2 writes are "file sync" writes */
        result->verf->committed = NFS_FILE_SYNC;

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-27 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26  9:47 Linux-next-20190823: x86_64/i386: prot_hsymlinks.c:325: Failed to run cmd: useradd hsym Naresh Kamboju
2019-08-26 10:41 ` Cyril Hrubis
2019-08-26 11:05   ` Jan Stancek
2019-08-26 13:50     ` Naresh Kamboju
2019-08-26 14:38       ` Jan Stancek
2019-08-26 15:58         ` Trond Myklebust
2019-08-26 23:12           ` Jan Stancek
2019-08-27  0:59             ` Trond Myklebust
2019-08-27 10:25               ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-08-27 12:58                 ` Trond Myklebust
2019-08-27 13:20                   ` Jan Stancek
2019-08-27  6:34             ` Naresh Kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=866876796.8349197.1566901536625.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexey.kodanev@oracle.com \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=the_hoang0709@yahoo.com \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).