From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm tree
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 18:52:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frzdyrbg.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240103122734.16b29e09@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, 03 Jan 2024, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> OK, the only thing I can find is that there are 2 intel_wakeref.h files
> that have different definitions for intel_wakeref_t:
>
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h:typedef unsigned long intel_wakeref_t;
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_wakeref.h:typedef bool intel_wakeref_t;
>
> and the two compilations above seem to use different include paths, but
> how the single character change causes that is beyond me.
There are a few things going on here, but the gist of it is that
intel_wakeref_t is supposed to be an opaque cookie, and printing its
value does not make sense, especially not when you can't be certain
which printf format should be used for it.
Fix at [1], thanks for the report.
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240104164600.783371-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 0:12 linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-03 1:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-03 1:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-04 16:52 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-07 6:17 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-07 14:19 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-05 6:47 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-25 0:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-26 8:48 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-11-24 2:25 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-24 12:35 ` Donald Robson
2023-11-24 2:23 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-24 2:17 Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-11 6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-11 9:48 ` Andi Shyti
2023-04-11 6:01 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-30 3:28 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-30 14:28 ` Rob Clark
2023-07-11 23:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-07-24 3:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-03 2:46 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-03 12:32 ` Gustavo Sousa
2023-01-05 3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-05 3:21 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-05 3:17 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-07 3:29 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-07 20:31 ` John Harrison
2022-02-02 4:10 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-02 1:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-02 4:02 Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-02 4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-02 8:38 ` Hans de Goede
2022-02-04 19:29 ` Rajat Jain
2022-03-02 1:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-02 10:32 ` Hans de Goede
2022-03-02 11:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-01 7:19 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-21 6:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-17 7:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-17 2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-22 0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-22 7:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-22 7:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-22 8:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-10-27 12:12 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-27 20:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-28 9:16 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-02-01 1:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-05 7:02 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-16 0:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-23 3:36 Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-23 6:27 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-10-01 9:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-11 3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-11 4:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-02-01 0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-25 4:22 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-25 4:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-18 23:18 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-02 1:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-04 0:30 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-04 0:57 ` Dave Airlie
2017-06-19 1:40 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-19 2:10 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-03 22:33 Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <tencent_62AF37B85899E2EA593CCE3B@qq.com>
2017-05-04 1:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-04 12:31 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-20 6:54 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-20 11:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-20 6:31 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-20 19:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-28 3:30 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-28 3:33 ` Dave Airlie
2013-04-19 5:50 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-08 5:08 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-28 2:41 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-28 2:36 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-12 2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-01 7:14 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87frzdyrbg.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).