linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* extcon-next: patch "extcon: max77843: Replace irqchip mask_invert with unmask_base" should be reverted
@ 2022-06-29 13:09 Aidan MacDonald
  2022-06-29 19:09 ` Chanwoo Choi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Aidan MacDonald @ 2022-06-29 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cw00.choi; +Cc: myungjoo.ham, linux-next, linux-kernel


Hi Chanwoo,

I just noticed that one of my patches wound up in extcon-next as
commit a7d674db4612 ("extcon: max77843: Replace irqchip mask_invert
with unmask_base").

That patch has been applied too early and should be reverted/dropped,
as it depends on changes made in my regmap-irq refactoring series[1].
My commit message was overly broad and didn't communicate that fact,
however. Unmask registers are in fact broken right now so the patch
doesn't work as advertised and will break the driver.

For avoidance of doubt my other two extcon patches you took,

    extcon: sm5502: Drop useless mask_invert flag on irqchip
    extcon: rt8973a: Drop useless mask_invert flag on irqchip

are safe to take early and do not need to be reverted.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220623211420.918875-1-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com/

Best regards,
Aidan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: extcon-next: patch "extcon: max77843: Replace irqchip mask_invert with unmask_base" should be reverted
  2022-06-29 13:09 extcon-next: patch "extcon: max77843: Replace irqchip mask_invert with unmask_base" should be reverted Aidan MacDonald
@ 2022-06-29 19:09 ` Chanwoo Choi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2022-06-29 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aidan MacDonald, cw00.choi; +Cc: myungjoo.ham, linux-next, linux-kernel

On 22. 6. 29. 22:09, Aidan MacDonald wrote:
> 
> Hi Chanwoo,
> 
> I just noticed that one of my patches wound up in extcon-next as
> commit a7d674db4612 ("extcon: max77843: Replace irqchip mask_invert
> with unmask_base").
> 
> That patch has been applied too early and should be reverted/dropped,
> as it depends on changes made in my regmap-irq refactoring series[1].
> My commit message was overly broad and didn't communicate that fact,
> however. Unmask registers are in fact broken right now so the patch
> doesn't work as advertised and will break the driver.
> 
> For avoidance of doubt my other two extcon patches you took,
> 
>     extcon: sm5502: Drop useless mask_invert flag on irqchip
>     extcon: rt8973a: Drop useless mask_invert flag on irqchip
> 
> are safe to take early and do not need to be reverted.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220623211420.918875-1-aidanmacdonald.0x0@gmail.com/
> 
> Best regards,
> Aidan

Hi Aidan,

Thanks for the report. I'll drop the patch
as you mentioned[1]

[1] "extcon: max77843: Replace irqchip mask_invert with unmask_base".

-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-29 19:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-29 13:09 extcon-next: patch "extcon: max77843: Replace irqchip mask_invert with unmask_base" should be reverted Aidan MacDonald
2022-06-29 19:09 ` Chanwoo Choi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).