linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: generalize GPIO line names property
       [not found] <20200908125813.8809-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
@ 2020-09-15 12:01 ` Anders Roxell
  2020-09-15 13:12   ` Andy Shevchenko
  2020-09-16 13:29   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Anders Roxell @ 2020-09-15 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartosz Golaszewski
  Cc: Linus Walleij, Mika Westerberg, Andy Shevchenko, Kent Gibson,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-acpi, Bartosz Golaszewski,
	lkft-triage, Linux-Next Mailing List, Stephen Rothwell

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 18:40, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>
> I initially sent this as part of the gpio-mockup overhaul but since
> these patches are indepentent and the work on gpio-mockup may become
> more complicated - I'm sending these separately.
>
> The only change is adding additional property helpers to count strings
> in array.
>
> Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
>   device: property: add helpers to count items in string arrays
>   gpiolib: generalize devprop_gpiochip_set_names() for device properties
>   gpiolib: unexport devprop_gpiochip_set_names()

I do an arm64 allmodconfig build fron linux-next (tag: next-20200915) and
run that in qemu. When I run I see the following output (see full log [1]):
"BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in device_property_read_string_array".


[ 6186.339462][    T1] unittest-gpio
testcase-data:overlay-node:test-bus:gpio@0: no pinctrl handle
[ 6186.346148][    T1] gpiochip_find_base: found new base at 507
[ 6186.348684][    T1]
==================================================================
[ 6186.351563][    T1] BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in
device_property_read_string_array+0x40/0xa0
[ 6186.355157][    T1] Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000570 by task
swapper/0/1
[ 6186.358212][    T1]
[ 6186.359361][    T1] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G
W         5.9.0-rc5-next-20200915-00006-g104c8fe4916b #1
[ 6186.363877][    T1] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[ 6186.366156][    T1] Call trace:
[ 6186.367540][    T1]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x320
[ 6186.369446][    T1]  show_stack+0x38/0x60
[ 6186.371282][    T1]  dump_stack+0x1d4/0x278
[ 6186.373193][    T1]  __kasan_report+0x148/0x180
[ 6186.375265][    T1]  kasan_report+0x44/0xe0
[ 6186.377168][    T1]  __asan_load8+0xbc/0xe0
[ 6186.379069][    T1]  device_property_read_string_array+0x40/0xa0
[ 6186.381741][    T1]  devprop_gpiochip_set_names.isra.0+0x4c/0x200
[ 6186.384394][    T1]  gpiochip_add_data_with_key+0x75c/0xf80
[ 6186.386876][    T1]  unittest_gpio_probe+0xf4/0x1e0
[ 6186.389049][    T1]  platform_drv_probe+0xac/0x160
[ 6186.391184][    T1]  really_probe+0x430/0xaa0
[ 6186.393136][    T1]  really_probe_debug+0x3c/0xe0
[ 6186.395238][    T1]  driver_probe_device+0x134/0x1c0
[ 6186.397443][    T1]  device_driver_attach+0xec/0x180
[ 6186.399639][    T1]  __driver_attach+0x1f0/0x220
[ 6186.401718][    T1]  bus_for_each_dev+0x104/0x1c0
[ 6186.403796][    T1]  driver_attach+0x44/0x60
[ 6186.405731][    T1]  bus_add_driver+0x214/0x3c0
[ 6186.407745][    T1]  driver_register+0x1a8/0x240
[ 6186.409835][    T1]  __platform_driver_register+0x90/0xa0
[ 6186.412207][    T1]  of_unittest_overlay_gpio+0x20c/0x7cc
[ 6186.414595][    T1]  of_unittest_overlay+0x748/0x7c0
[ 6186.416810][    T1]  of_unittest+0x148/0x184
[ 6186.418732][    T1]  do_one_initcall+0xc4/0x280
[ 6186.420782][    T1]  do_initcalls+0x148/0x1ac
[ 6186.422758][    T1]  kernel_init_freeable+0x158/0x1a0
[ 6186.425023][    T1]  kernel_init+0x24/0x1f0
[ 6186.426938][    T1]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[ 6186.428894][    T1]
==================================================================
[ 6186.433241][    T1] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable
memory at virtual address 0000000000000570
[ 6186.437207][    T1] Mem abort info:
[ 6186.438639][    T1]   ESR = 0x96000004
[ 6186.440536][    T1]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 6186.442791][    T1]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 6186.444660][    T1]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 6186.446233][    T1] Data abort info:
[ 6186.447938][    T1]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
[ 6186.449749][    T1]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
[ 6186.451222][    T1] [0000000000000570] user address but active_mm is swapper
[ 6186.454000][    T1] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 6186.456422][    T1] Modules linked in:
[ 6186.458232][    T1] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G    B
W         5.9.0-rc5-next-20200915-00006-g104c8fe4916b #1
[ 6186.462833][    T1] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[ 6186.465170][    T1] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
[ 6186.467910][    T1] pc : device_property_read_string_array+0x40/0xa0
[ 6186.470653][    T1] lr : device_property_read_string_array+0x40/0xa0
[ 6186.473380][    T1] sp : ffff000069827770
[ 6186.475138][    T1] x29: ffff000069827770 x28: ffffa00014a2cc20
[ 6186.477806][    T1] x27: ffff000068794760 x26: ffff000068794800
[ 6186.480444][    T1] x25: ffff000068794000 x24: ffff0000674e1094
[ 6186.483107][    T1] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000
[ 6186.485794][    T1] x21: ffffa00012d61ca0 x20: ffffa00012d61200
[ 6186.488457][    T1] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 00000000000014b8
[ 6186.491100][    T1] x17: 00000000000014f8 x16: 0000000000001438
[ 6186.493779][    T1] x15: 00000000f1f1f1f1 x14: 0000000000000003
[ 6186.496405][    T1] x13: 00000000000ca688 x12: ffff80000d304e7b
[ 6186.499084][    T1] x11: 1fffe0000d304e7a x10: ffff80000d304e7a
[ 6186.501775][    T1] x9 : ffffa00012702b2c x8 : ffff0000698273d7
[ 6186.504409][    T1] x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : 00007ffff2cfb186
[ 6186.507074][    T1] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : dfffa00000000000
[ 6186.509706][    T1] x3 : ffffa000126f85c4 x2 : 0000000000000007
[ 6186.512352][    T1] x1 : ffff00006981c040 x0 : 0000000000000001
[ 6186.515009][    T1] Call trace:
[ 6186.516511][    T1]  device_property_read_string_array+0x40/0xa0
[ 6186.519155][    T1]  devprop_gpiochip_set_names.isra.0+0x4c/0x200
[ 6186.521806][    T1]  gpiochip_add_data_with_key+0x75c/0xf80
[ 6186.524294][    T1]  unittest_gpio_probe+0xf4/0x1e0
[ 6186.526518][    T1]  platform_drv_probe+0xac/0x160
[ 6186.528632][    T1]  really_probe+0x430/0xaa0
[ 6186.530600][    T1]  really_probe_debug+0x3c/0xe0
[ 6186.532679][    T1]  driver_probe_device+0x134/0x1c0
[ 6186.534936][    T1]  device_driver_attach+0xec/0x180
[ 6186.537119][    T1]  __driver_attach+0x1f0/0x220
[ 6186.539182][    T1]  bus_for_each_dev+0x104/0x1c0
[ 6186.541315][    T1]  driver_attach+0x44/0x60
[ 6186.543233][    T1]  bus_add_driver+0x214/0x3c0
[ 6186.545307][    T1]  driver_register+0x1a8/0x240
[ 6186.547373][    T1]  __platform_driver_register+0x90/0xa0
[ 6186.549754][    T1]  of_unittest_overlay_gpio+0x20c/0x7cc
[ 6186.552105][    T1]  of_unittest_overlay+0x748/0x7c0
[ 6186.554272][    T1]  of_unittest+0x148/0x184
[ 6186.556193][    T1]  do_one_initcall+0xc4/0x280
[ 6186.558248][    T1]  do_initcalls+0x148/0x1ac
[ 6186.560227][    T1]  kernel_init_freeable+0x158/0x1a0
[ 6186.562492][    T1]  kernel_init+0x24/0x1f0
[ 6186.564395][    T1]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[ 6186.566404][    T1] Code: aa0303f7 97b54003 9115c260 97c3ca39 (f942ba74)
[ 6186.569375][    T1] ---[ end trace f489669ae669dad0 ]---
[ 6186.571688][    T1] Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception
[ 6186.574448][    T1] Kernel Offset: disabled
[ 6186.576306][    T1] CPU features: 0x0240002,20002004
[ 6186.578453][    T1] Memory Limit: none
[ 6186.580215][    T1] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops:
Fatal exception ]---


Cheers,
Anders
[1] http://ix.io/2xDy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: generalize GPIO line names property
  2020-09-15 12:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: generalize GPIO line names property Anders Roxell
@ 2020-09-15 13:12   ` Andy Shevchenko
  2020-09-15 13:16     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
       [not found]     ` <20200915131648.GY3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
  2020-09-16 13:29   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-09-15 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anders Roxell
  Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski, Linus Walleij, Mika Westerberg, Kent Gibson,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-acpi, Bartosz Golaszewski,
	lkft-triage, Linux-Next Mailing List, Stephen Rothwell

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:01:56PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 18:40, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> >
> > I initially sent this as part of the gpio-mockup overhaul but since
> > these patches are indepentent and the work on gpio-mockup may become
> > more complicated - I'm sending these separately.
> >
> > The only change is adding additional property helpers to count strings
> > in array.
> >
> > Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
> >   device: property: add helpers to count items in string arrays
> >   gpiolib: generalize devprop_gpiochip_set_names() for device properties
> >   gpiolib: unexport devprop_gpiochip_set_names()

Ha-ha, OF unittest is of_node centric. definitely there is no backed device.

Bart, it seems we are stuck with fwnode interface.

> [ 6186.379069][    T1]  device_property_read_string_array+0x40/0xa0
> [ 6186.381741][    T1]  devprop_gpiochip_set_names.isra.0+0x4c/0x200
> [ 6186.384394][    T1]  gpiochip_add_data_with_key+0x75c/0xf80
> [ 6186.386876][    T1]  unittest_gpio_probe+0xf4/0x1e0

> [ 6186.433241][    T1] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable
> memory at virtual address 0000000000000570
> [ 6186.437207][    T1] Mem abort info:
> [ 6186.438639][    T1]   ESR = 0x96000004
> [ 6186.440536][    T1]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> [ 6186.442791][    T1]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
> [ 6186.444660][    T1]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> [ 6186.446233][    T1] Data abort info:
> [ 6186.447938][    T1]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
> [ 6186.449749][    T1]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
> [ 6186.451222][    T1] [0000000000000570] user address but active_mm is swapper
> [ 6186.454000][    T1] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 6186.456422][    T1] Modules linked in:
> [ 6186.458232][    T1] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G    B
> W         5.9.0-rc5-next-20200915-00006-g104c8fe4916b #1
> [ 6186.462833][    T1] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> [ 6186.465170][    T1] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
> [ 6186.467910][    T1] pc : device_property_read_string_array+0x40/0xa0
> [ 6186.470653][    T1] lr : device_property_read_string_array+0x40/0xa0

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: generalize GPIO line names property
  2020-09-15 13:12   ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2020-09-15 13:16     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  2020-09-15 15:16       ` Andy Shevchenko
       [not found]     ` <20200915131648.GY3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2020-09-15 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Anders Roxell, Linus Walleij, Mika Westerberg, Kent Gibson,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, ACPI Devel Maling List,
	Bartosz Golaszewski, lkft-triage, Linux-Next Mailing List,
	Stephen Rothwell

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:01:56PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 18:40, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> > >
> > > I initially sent this as part of the gpio-mockup overhaul but since
> > > these patches are indepentent and the work on gpio-mockup may become
> > > more complicated - I'm sending these separately.
> > >
> > > The only change is adding additional property helpers to count strings
> > > in array.
> > >
> > > Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
> > >   device: property: add helpers to count items in string arrays
> > >   gpiolib: generalize devprop_gpiochip_set_names() for device properties
> > >   gpiolib: unexport devprop_gpiochip_set_names()
>
> Ha-ha, OF unittest is of_node centric. definitely there is no backed device.
>
> Bart, it seems we are stuck with fwnode interface.
>

Wait what?! This means the implementation is wrong - the whole concept
of device properties is to be generic and to hide the underlying
fwnode or OF properties. If anything we should fix
device/base/property.c to fall back to OF.

What is happening exactly? If all fwnode code compiled out?

I'll try to give it a spin and see what can be done but I don't like
that device_property_* functions fail if you have OF but not fwnode.

Bart

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: generalize GPIO line names property
  2020-09-15 13:16     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2020-09-15 15:16       ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2020-09-15 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartosz Golaszewski
  Cc: Anders Roxell, Linus Walleij, Mika Westerberg, Kent Gibson,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, ACPI Devel Maling List,
	Bartosz Golaszewski, lkft-triage, Linux-Next Mailing List,
	Stephen Rothwell

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:16:42PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:12 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:01:56PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 18:40, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> > > >
> > > > I initially sent this as part of the gpio-mockup overhaul but since
> > > > these patches are indepentent and the work on gpio-mockup may become
> > > > more complicated - I'm sending these separately.
> > > >
> > > > The only change is adding additional property helpers to count strings
> > > > in array.
> > > >
> > > > Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
> > > >   device: property: add helpers to count items in string arrays
> > > >   gpiolib: generalize devprop_gpiochip_set_names() for device properties
> > > >   gpiolib: unexport devprop_gpiochip_set_names()
> >
> > Ha-ha, OF unittest is of_node centric. definitely there is no backed device.
> >
> > Bart, it seems we are stuck with fwnode interface.
> >
> 
> Wait what?! This means the implementation is wrong - the whole concept
> of device properties is to be generic and to hide the underlying
> fwnode or OF properties. If anything we should fix
> device/base/property.c to fall back to OF.
> 
> What is happening exactly? If all fwnode code compiled out?
> 
> I'll try to give it a spin and see what can be done but I don't like
> that device_property_* functions fail if you have OF but not fwnode.

Read my next reply. It seems only OF unittest issue

% git grep -n -w fwnode -- drivers/of/unittest* | wc -l
0
% git grep -n -w fwnode -- drivers/of/ | wc -l
50

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: generalize GPIO line names property
       [not found]     ` <20200915131648.GY3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
@ 2020-09-15 16:03       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2020-09-15 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Anders Roxell, Bartosz Golaszewski, Linus Walleij,
	Mika Westerberg, Kent Gibson, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
	open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	ACPI Devel Maling List, lkft-triage, Linux-Next Mailing List,
	Stephen Rothwell

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:16 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:12:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:01:56PM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 18:40, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> > > >
> > > > I initially sent this as part of the gpio-mockup overhaul but since
> > > > these patches are indepentent and the work on gpio-mockup may become
> > > > more complicated - I'm sending these separately.
> > > >
> > > > The only change is adding additional property helpers to count strings
> > > > in array.
> > > >
> > > > Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
> > > >   device: property: add helpers to count items in string arrays
> > > >   gpiolib: generalize devprop_gpiochip_set_names() for device properties
> > > >   gpiolib: unexport devprop_gpiochip_set_names()
> >
> > Ha-ha, OF unittest is of_node centric. definitely there is no backed device.
> >
> > Bart, it seems we are stuck with fwnode interface.
>
> Hmm... There is a platform device. So, it means that it fails along these
> lines:
>   return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node ? &dev->of_node->fwnode : dev->fwnode;
> so, who should set fwnode for of_node?
>

It's strange because the device for this unittest is registered
similarly to how we do it in gpio-mockup where this function works.
I've not investigated the internals but somewhere someone sets the
fwnode for these platform devices.

Bartosz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: generalize GPIO line names property
  2020-09-15 12:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: generalize GPIO line names property Anders Roxell
  2020-09-15 13:12   ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2020-09-16 13:29   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2020-09-16 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anders Roxell
  Cc: Linus Walleij, Mika Westerberg, Andy Shevchenko, Kent Gibson,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, ACPI Devel Maling List,
	Bartosz Golaszewski, lkft-triage, Linux-Next Mailing List,
	Stephen Rothwell

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 2:02 PM Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 18:40, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> >
> > I initially sent this as part of the gpio-mockup overhaul but since
> > these patches are indepentent and the work on gpio-mockup may become
> > more complicated - I'm sending these separately.
> >
> > The only change is adding additional property helpers to count strings
> > in array.
> >
> > Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
> >   device: property: add helpers to count items in string arrays
> >   gpiolib: generalize devprop_gpiochip_set_names() for device properties
> >   gpiolib: unexport devprop_gpiochip_set_names()
>
> I do an arm64 allmodconfig build fron linux-next (tag: next-20200915) and
> run that in qemu. When I run I see the following output (see full log [1]):
> "BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in device_property_read_string_array".
>
>

FYI: this fails because someone passes a NULL struct device * to
dev_fwnode() - this is probably caused by some ordering issues in this
patch. I'm working on it.

Bartosz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-16 20:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20200908125813.8809-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
2020-09-15 12:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: generalize GPIO line names property Anders Roxell
2020-09-15 13:12   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-15 13:16     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-09-15 15:16       ` Andy Shevchenko
     [not found]     ` <20200915131648.GY3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
2020-09-15 16:03       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2020-09-16 13:29   ` Bartosz Golaszewski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).