From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [powerpc] Intermittent crashes ( link_path_walk) with linux-next
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 21:54:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F38D23C3-09FE-408F-9F50-A7C87280FA1F@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200326134925.GP23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
> On 26-Mar-2020, at 7:19 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:40:06PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>>> The code in question (link_path_walk() in fs/namei.c ) was recently changed by
>>> following commit:
>>>
>>> commit 881386f7e46a:
>>> link_path_walk(): sample parent's i_uid and i_mode for the last component
>>
>> That and about 10 other commits.
>>
>> Unless Al can give us a clue we'll need to bisect.
>
> Already fixed yesterday. It's not link_path_walk(), it's handle_dots()
> ignoring an error returned by step_into().
>
> commit 5e3c3570ec97 is the broken one; commit 20971012f63e is its variant with the
> fix folded in. So next-20200325 has the bug and next-20200326 should have it
> fixed. Could you check the current -next and see if you still observe that crap?
Thanks Al for the information.
I confirm that today’s next tree (20200326) work for me. I can no longer recreate this
problem.
Thanks
-Sachin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-26 8:27 [powerpc] Intermittent crashes ( link_path_walk) with linux-next Sachin Sant
2020-03-26 11:40 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-26 13:49 ` Al Viro
2020-03-26 16:24 ` Sachin Sant [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F38D23C3-09FE-408F-9F50-A7C87280FA1F@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).