linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: next/master baseline: 278 tests, 0 regressions (next-20190612)
       [not found] <5d00ff67.1c69fb81.878d4.023d@mx.google.com>
@ 2019-06-12 15:02 ` Guillaume Tucker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Guillaume Tucker @ 2019-06-12 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Enric Balletbo i Serra; +Cc: kernel-build-reports, linux-next

On 12/06/2019 14:34, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> next/master baseline: 278 tests, 0 regressions (next-20190612)
> 
> Test results summary
> --------------------
> 
>   Test:    baseline
>   Tree:    next
>   Branch:  master
>   Kernel:  next-20190612
>   URL:     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
>   Commit:  81a72c79224f83af18e26dc0c599f917312e6c78
> 
> 
> 1  | rk3399-gru-kevin       | gcc-8    | arm64 |  78 total:  78 PASS   0 FAIL   0 SKIP
> 2  | rk3399-gru-kevin       | gcc-8    | arm64 |  78 total:  78 PASS   0 FAIL   0 SKIP
> 3  | rk3288-veyron-jaq      | gcc-8    | arm   |  61 total:  60 PASS   1 FAIL   0 SKIP
> 4  | rk3288-veyron-jaq      | gcc-8    | arm   |  61 total:  60 PASS   1 FAIL   0 SKIP  
>   
>   
>     
> 
> Test failures
> ------------- 
> 3  | rk3288-veyron-jaq      | gcc-8    | arm   |  61 total:  60 PASS   1 FAIL   0 SKIP
> 
>   Config:      multi_v7_defconfig
>   Compiler:    gcc-8 (arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Debian 8.3.0-2) 8.3.0)
>   Lab Name:    lab-collabora
>   Plain log:   https://storage.kernelci.org//next/master/next-20190612/arm/multi_v7_defconfig/gcc-8/lab-collabora/baseline-rk3288-veyron-jaq.txt
>   HTML log:    https://storage.kernelci.org//next/master/next-20190612/arm/multi_v7_defconfig/gcc-8/lab-collabora/baseline-rk3288-veyron-jaq.html
>   Rootfs:      https://storage.kernelci.org/images/rootfs/buildroot/kci-2019.02-2-gefc755ba4a02/armel/baseline/rootfs.cpio.gz
>       
> 
>     bootrr - 61 tests: 60  PASS, 1 FAIL, 0 SKIP
>       * rk3x-i2c5-probed: never passed   

It says it never passed, but it's passing in mainline.  So this
failure is not reported as a regression here because the baseline
test plan was enabled very recently and this never passed in
linux-next indeed.

In other words, this does look like a regression that's about to
get merged into mainline.  Probably worth a look?

Guillaume


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-06-12 15:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <5d00ff67.1c69fb81.878d4.023d@mx.google.com>
2019-06-12 15:02 ` next/master baseline: 278 tests, 0 regressions (next-20190612) Guillaume Tucker

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).