linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: fate of the cleancache tree
@ 2010-11-17  2:33 Stephen Rothwell
  2010-11-17  4:44 ` Dan Magenheimer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-11-17  2:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus, Dan Magenheimer
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Al Viro, Christoph Hellwig, Andrew Morton

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 443 bytes --]

Hi Linus, Dan,

I didn't really follow the discussion at Kernel Summit, but there seemed
to be some question as to whether the cleancache stuff will be merged or
not.  It missed 2.6.37 (obviously), but my question now is do I keep in
in linux-next in the hope that it will be merged in 2.6.38?  Or is that
not going to happen?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* RE: linux-next: fate of the cleancache tree
  2010-11-17  2:33 linux-next: fate of the cleancache tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-11-17  4:44 ` Dan Magenheimer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan Magenheimer @ 2010-11-17  4:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Linus
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Al Viro, Christoph Hellwig, Andrew Morton

> From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:sfr@canb.auug.org.au]
> To: Linus; Dan Magenheimer
> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Al Viro;
> Christoph Hellwig; Andrew Morton
> Subject: linux-next: fate of the cleancache tree
> 
> Hi Linus, Dan,
> 
> I didn't really follow the discussion at Kernel Summit, but there
> seemed
> to be some question as to whether the cleancache stuff will be merged
> or
> not.  It missed 2.6.37 (obviously), but my question now is do I keep in
> in linux-next in the hope that it will be merged in 2.6.38?  Or is that
> not going to happen?

Hi Stephen --

I am continuing to work towards other users for cleancache.  While
it is not clear if they will be ready in time for the 2.6.38 window,
it is possible.  If it is not too difficult to keep cleancache in
linux-next for now, I'd appreciate it if it stayed in.  However
if you or Linus prefer otherwise, I understand.

Thanks,
Dan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-17  4:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-17  2:33 linux-next: fate of the cleancache tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-17  4:44 ` Dan Magenheimer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).