[linux-nfc] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: Remove the max_payload

[linux-nfc] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: Remove the max_payload

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 958 bytes --]

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020@09:14, Bongsu Jeon <bs.jeon87@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2020-11-17 16:42 GMT+09:00, krzk@kernel.org <krzk@kernel.org>:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020@10:16:11AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> >> max_payload is unused.
> >
> > Why did you resend the patch ignoring my review? I already provided you
> > with a tag, so you should include it.
> >
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
>
> Sorry about that. I included the tag.

You need to reduce the rate of sending new patches. You sent v1. Then
you sent again v1, which I reviewed. Then you send v2 without my
review. So I provided a review. Then you sent again a v2 with my
reviewed tags. So there are two v1 patches and two v2. Since I
provided you the review tags for v2, no need to send v2 again. It
confuses.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[linux-nfc] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] nfc: s3fwrn5: Remove the max_payload

[krzk]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020@10:16:11AM +0900, Bongsu Jeon wrote:
> max_payload is unused.

Why did you resend the patch ignoring my review? I already provided you
with a tag, so you should include it.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof