* [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 @ 2018-06-12 13:39 Trond Myklebust 2018-06-12 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Trond Myklebust @ 2018-06-12 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-nfs SGkgTGludXMsDQoNClRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgY2hhbmdlcyBzaW5jZSBjb21taXQgNzg2YjcxZjVi NzU0MjczY2NlZjZkOTQ2MmU1MjA2MmIzZTFmOTg3NzoNCg0KICBNZXJnZSB0YWcgJ25kczMyLWZv ci1saW51cy00LjE3LWZpeGVzJyBvZiBnaXQ6Ly9naXQua2VybmVsLm9yZy9wdWIvc2NtL2xpbnV4 L2tlcm5lbC9naXQvZ3JlZW50aW1lL2xpbnV4ICgyMDE4LTA1LTI4IDA1OjI1OjU3IC0wNzAwKQ0K DQphcmUgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGluIHRoZSBHaXQgcmVwb3NpdG9yeSBhdDoNCg0KICBnaXQ6Ly9naXQu bGludXgtbmZzLm9yZy9wcm9qZWN0cy90cm9uZG15L2xpbnV4LW5mcy5naXQgdGFncy9uZnMtZm9y LTQuMTgtMQ0KDQpmb3IgeW91IHRvIGZldGNoIGNoYW5nZXMgdXAgdG8gOTNiN2Y3YWQyMDE4ZDIw Mzc1NTliMWQwODkyNDE3ODY0Yzc4YjM3MToNCg0KICBza2lwIExBWU9VVFJFVFVSTiBpZiBsYXlv dXQgaXMgaW52YWxpZCAoMjAxOC0wNi0xMiAwODo0ODowNCAtMDQwMCkNCg0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KICBU cm9uZA0KDQotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQpORlMgY2xpZW50IHVwZGF0ZXMgZm9yIExpbnV4IDQuMTgNCg0KSGln aGxpZ2h0cyBpbmNsdWRlOg0KDQpTdGFibGUgZml4ZXM6DQotIEZpeCBhIDEtYnl0ZSBzdGFjayBv dmVyZmxvdyBpbiBuZnNfaWRtYXBfcmVhZF9hbmRfdmVyaWZ5X21lc3NhZ2UNCi0gRml4IGEgaGFu ZyBkdWUgdG8gaW5jb3JyZWN0IGVycm9yIHJldHVybnMgaW4gcnBjcmRtYV9jb252ZXJ0X2lvdnMo KQ0KLSBSZXZlcnQgYW4gaW5jb3JyZWN0IGNoYW5nZSB0byB0aGUgTkZTdjQuMSBjYWxsYmFjayBj aGFubmVsDQotIEZpeCBhIGJ1ZyBpbiB0aGUgTkZTdjQuMSBzZXF1ZW5jZSBlcnJvciBoYW5kbGlu Zw0KDQpGZWF0dXJlcyBhbmQgb3B0aW1pc2F0aW9uczoNCi0gU3VwcG9ydCBmb3IgcGlnZ3liYWNr aW5nIGEgTEFZT1VUR0VUIG9wZXJhdGlvbiB0byB0aGUgT1BFTiBjb21wb3VuZA0KLSBSRE1BIHBl cmZvcm1hbmNlIGVuaGFuY2VtZW50cyB0byBkZWFsIHdpdGggdHJhbnNwb3J0IGNvbmdlc3Rpb24N Ci0gQWRkIHByb3BlciBTUERYIHRhZ3MgZm9yIE5ldEFwcC1jb250cmlidXRlZCBSRE1BIHNvdXJj ZQ0KLSBEbyBub3QgcmVxdWVzdCBkZWxlZ2F0ZWQgZmlsZSBhdHRyaWJ1dGVzIChzaXplK2NoYW5n ZSkgZnJvbSB0aGUgc2VydmVyDQotIE9wdGltaXNlIGF3YXkgYSBHRVRBVFRSIGluIHRoZSBsb29r dXAgcmV2YWxpZGF0ZSBjb2RlIHdoZW4gZG9pbmcgTkZTdjQgT1BFTg0KLSBPcHRpbWlzZSBhd2F5 IHVubmVjZXNzYXJ5IGxvb2t1cHMgZm9yIHJlbmFtZSB0YXJnZXRzDQotIE1pc2MgcGVyZm9ybWFu Y2UgaW1wcm92ZW1lbnRzIHdoZW4gZnJlZWluZyBORlN2NCBkZWxlZ2F0aW9ucw0KDQpCdWdmaXhl cyBhbmQgY2xlYW51cHM6DQotIFRyeSB0byBmYWlsIHF1aWNrbHkgaWYgcHJvdG89cmRtYQ0KLSBD bGVhbiB1cCBSRE1BIHJlY2VpdmUgdHJhY2UgcG9pbnRzDQotIEZpeCBzaWxseXJlbmFtZSB0byBy ZXR1cm4gdGhlIGRlbGVnYXRpb24gd2hlbiBhcHByb3ByaWF0ZQ0KLSBNaXNjIGF0dHJpYnV0ZSBy ZXZhbGlkYXRpb24gZml4ZXMNCi0gSW1tZWRpYXRlbHkgY2xlYXIgdGhlIHBORlMgbGF5b3V0IG9u IGEgZmlsZSB3aGVuIHRoZSBzZXJ2ZXIgcmV0dXJucyBFU1RBTEUNCi0gUmV0dXJuIE5GUzRFUlJf REVMQVkgd2hlbiBkZWxlZ2F0aW9uL2xheW91dCByZWNhbGxzIGZhaWwgZHVlIHRvIGlncmFiKCkN Ci0gRml4IHRoZSBjbGllbnQgYmVoYXZpb3VyIG9uIE5GUzRFUlJfU0VRX0ZBTFNFX1JFVFJZDQoN Ci0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0NCkFubmEgU2NodW1ha2VyICg0KToNCiAgICAgIE5GUzogTW92ZSBjYWxsIHRvIG5m czRfc3RhdGVfcHJvdGVjdF93cml0ZSgpIHRvIG5mczRfd3JpdGVfc2V0dXAoKQ0KICAgICAgTkZT OiBNb3ZlIGNhbGwgdG8gbmZzNF9zdGF0ZV9wcm90ZWN0KCkgdG8gbmZzNF9jb21taXRfc2V0dXAo KQ0KICAgICAgTkZTOiBQYXNzICJwcml2aWxlZ2VkIiB2YWx1ZSB0byBuZnM0X2luaXRfc2VxdWVu Y2UoKQ0KICAgICAgTkZTOiBNZXJnZSBuZnM0MV9mcmVlX3N0YXRlaWQoKSB3aXRoIF9uZnM0MV9m cmVlX3N0YXRlaWQoKQ0KDQpCZW5qYW1pbiBDb2RkaW5ndG9uICgxKToNCiAgICAgIE5GU3Y0OiBE b24ndCBhZGQgYSBuZXcgbG9jayBvbiBhbiBpbnRlcnJ1cHRlZCB3YWl0IGZvciBMT0NLDQoNCkNo dWNrIExldmVyICgyMSk6DQogICAgICB4cHJ0cmRtYTogQWRkIHByb3BlciBTUERYIHRhZ3MgZm9y IE5ldEFwcC1jb250cmlidXRlZCBzb3VyY2UNCiAgICAgIHhwcnRyZG1hOiBUcnkgdG8gZmFpbCBx dWlja2x5IGlmIHByb3RvPXJkbWENCiAgICAgIHhwcnRyZG1hOiBDcmVhdGUgdHJhbnNwb3J0J3Mg Q00gSUQgaW4gdGhlIGNvcnJlY3QgbmV0d29yayBuYW1lc3BhY2UNCiAgICAgIHhwcnRyZG1hOiBG aXggbWF4X3NlbmRfd3IgY29tcHV0YXRpb24NCiAgICAgIFNVTlJQQzogSW5pdGlhbGl6ZSBycGNf cnFzdCBvdXRzaWRlIG9mIHhwcnQtPnJlc2VydmVfbG9jaw0KICAgICAgU1VOUlBDOiBBZGQgYSAt PmZyZWVfc2xvdCB0cmFuc3BvcnQgY2FsbG91dA0KICAgICAgeHBydHJkbWE6IEludHJvZHVjZSAt PmFsbG9jX3Nsb3QgY2FsbC1vdXQgZm9yIHhwcnRyZG1hDQogICAgICB4cHJ0cmRtYTogTWFrZSBy cGNfcnFzdCBwYXJ0IG9mIHJwY3JkbWFfcmVxDQogICAgICB4cHJ0cmRtYTogQ2xlYW4gdXAgUmVj ZWl2ZSB0cmFjZSBwb2ludHMNCiAgICAgIHhwcnRyZG1hOiBNb3ZlIFJlY2VpdmUgcG9zdGluZyB0 byBSZWNlaXZlIGhhbmRsZXINCiAgICAgIHhwcnRyZG1hOiBSZW1vdmUgcnBjcmRtYV9lcF97cG9z dF9yZWN2LCBwb3N0X2V4dHJhX3JlY3Z9DQogICAgICB4cHJ0cmRtYTogUmVtb3ZlIHJwY3JkbWFf YnVmZmVyX2dldF9yZXFfbG9ja2VkKCkNCiAgICAgIHhwcnRyZG1hOiBSZW1vdmUgcnBjcmRtYV9i dWZmZXJfZ2V0X3JlcF9sb2NrZWQoKQ0KICAgICAgeHBydHJkbWE6IE1ha2UgcnBjcmRtYV9zZW5k Y3R4X3B1dF9sb2NrZWQoKSBhIHN0YXRpYyBmdW5jdGlvbg0KICAgICAgeHBydHJkbWE6IFJldHVy biAtRU5PQlVGUyB3aGVuIG5vIHBhZ2VzIGFyZSBhdmFpbGFibGUNCiAgICAgIHhwcnRyZG1hOiBN b3ZlIGNvbW1vbiB3YWl0X2Zvcl9idWZmZXJfc3BhY2UgY2FsbCB0byBwYXJlbnQgZnVuY3Rpb24N CiAgICAgIHhwcnRyZG1hOiBXYWl0IG9uIGVtcHR5IHNlbmRjdHggcXVldWUNCiAgICAgIHhwcnRy ZG1hOiBBZGQgdHJhY2VfeHBydHJkbWFfZG1hX21hcChtcikNCiAgICAgIHhwcnRyZG1hOiBSZW1v dmUgdHJhbnNmZXJ0eXBlcyBhcnJheQ0KICAgICAgTkZTdjQuMDogUmVtb3ZlIGNsX2lwYWRkciBm cm9tIG5vbi1VQ1MgY2xpZW50IElEDQogICAgICBORlN2NC4wOiBSZW1vdmUgdHJhbnNwb3J0IHBy b3RvY29sIG5hbWUgZnJvbSBub24tVUNTIGNsaWVudCBJRA0KDQpEYXZlIFd5c29jaGFuc2tpICgx KToNCiAgICAgIE5GU3Y0OiBGaXggcG9zc2libGUgMS1ieXRlIHN0YWNrIG92ZXJmbG93IGluIG5m c19pZG1hcF9yZWFkX2FuZF92ZXJpZnlfbWVzc2FnZQ0KDQpGcmVkIElzYW1hbiAoMTQpOg0KICAg ICAgcG5mczogUmVtb3ZlIHJlZHVuZGFudCBhc3NpZ25tZW50IGZyb20gbmZzNF9wcm9jX2xheW91 dGdldCgpLg0KICAgICAgcG5mczogU3RvcmUgcmV0dXJuIHZhbHVlIG9mIGRlY29kZV9sYXlvdXRn ZXQgZm9yIGxhdGVyIHByb2Nlc3NpbmcNCiAgICAgIE5GUzQ6IG1vdmUgY3R4IGludG8gbmZzNF9y dW5fb3Blbl90YXNrDQogICAgICBwbmZzOiBBZGQgbGF5b3V0IGRyaXZlciBmbGFnIFBORlNfTEFZ T1VUR0VUX09OX09QRU4NCiAgICAgIHBuZnM6IHJlZmFjdG9yIHNlbmRfbGF5b3V0Z2V0DQogICAg ICBwbmZzOiBtb3ZlIGFsbG9jYXRpb25zIG91dCBvZiBuZnM0X3Byb2NfbGF5b3V0Z2V0DQogICAg ICBwbmZzOiBBZGQgY29uZGl0aW9uYWwgZW5jb2RlL2RlY29kZSBvZiBMQVlPVVRHRVQgd2l0aGlu IE9QRU4gY29tcG91bmQNCiAgICAgIHBuZnM6IE1vdmUgbmZzNF9vcGVuZGF0YSBpbnRvIG5mczRf ZnMuaA0KICAgICAgcG5mczogQ2hhbmdlIHBuZnNfYWxsb2NfaW5pdF9sYXlvdXRnZXRfYXJncyBj YWxsIHNpZ25hdHVyZQ0KICAgICAgcG5mczogQWRkIExBWU9VVEdFVCB0byBPUEVOIG9mIGEgbmV3 IGZpbGUNCiAgICAgIHBuZnM6IEFkZCBMQVlPVVRHRVQgdG8gT1BFTiBvZiBhbiBleGlzdGluZyBm aWxlDQogICAgICBwbmZzOiBTdG9wIGF0dGVtcHRpbmcgTEFZT1VUR0VUIG9uIE9QRU4gb24gZmFp bHVyZQ0KICAgICAgcG5mczogQWRkIGJhcnJpZXIgdG8gcHJldmVudCBsZ29wZW4gdXNpbmcgTEFZ T1VUR0VUIGR1cmluZyByZWNhbGwNCiAgICAgIHBuZnM6IEZpeCBtYW5pcHVsYXRpb24gb2YgTkZT X0xBWU9VVF9GSVJTVF9MQVlPVVRHRVQNCg0KTmVpbEJyb3duICg0KToNCiAgICAgIE5GUzogc2xp Z2h0IG9wdGltaXphdGlvbiBmb3Igd2Fsa2luZyBsaXN0IGZvciBkZWxlZ2F0aW9ucw0KICAgICAg TkZTOiB1c2UgY29uZF9yZXNjaGVkKCkgd2hlbiByZXN0YXJ0aW5nIHdhbGsgb2YgZGVsZWdhdGlv biBsaXN0Lg0KICAgICAgcmN1bGlzdDogYWRkIGxpc3RfZm9yX2VhY2hfZW50cnlfZnJvbV9yY3Uo KQ0KICAgICAgTkZTOiBBdm9pZCBxdWFkcmF0aWMgc2VhcmNoIHdoZW4gZnJlZWluZyBkZWxlZ2F0 aW9ucy4NCg0KT2xnYSBLb3JuaWV2c2thaWEgKDEpOg0KICAgICAgc2tpcCBMQVlPVVRSRVRVUk4g aWYgbGF5b3V0IGlzIGludmFsaWQNCg0KVHJvbmQgTXlrbGVidXN0ICgzNSk6DQogICAgICBORlM6 IE9wdGltaXNlIGF3YXkgdGhlIGNsb3NlLXRvLW9wZW4gR0VUQVRUUiB3aGVuIHdlIGhhdmUgTkZT djQgT1BFTg0KICAgICAgTkZTOiBJZiB0aGUgVkZTIHNldHMgTE9PS1VQX1JFVkFMIHRoZW4gZm9y Y2UgYSBsb29rdXAgb2YgdGhlIGRlbnRyeQ0KICAgICAgTkZTOiBPcHRpbWlzZSBhd2F5IGxvb2t1 cHMgZm9yIHJlbmFtZSB0YXJnZXRzDQogICAgICBORlN2NDogT25seSBwYXNzIHRoZSBkZWxlZ2F0 aW9uIHRvIHNldGF0dHIgaWYgd2UncmUgc2VuZGluZyBhIHRydW5jYXRlDQogICAgICBORlN2NDog Rml4IHNpbGx5cmVuYW1lIHRvIHJldHVybiB0aGUgZGVsZWdhdGlvbiB3aGVuIGFwcHJvcHJpYXRl DQogICAgICBORlM6IEZpeCB1cCBzaWxseXJlbmFtZSgpDQogICAgICBORlM6IFNldCB0aGUgZm9y Y2UgcmV2YWxpZGF0ZSBmbGFnIGlmIHRoZSBpbm9kZSBpcyBub3QgY29tcGxldGVseSBpbml0aWFs aXNlZA0KICAgICAgTkZTOiBFbnN1cmUgd2UgcmV2YWxpZGF0ZSB0aGUgaW5vZGUgY29ycmVjdGx5 IGFmdGVyIHJlbW92ZSBvciByZW5hbWUNCiAgICAgIE5GUzogRW5zdXJlIHdlIHJldmFsaWRhdGUg dGhlIGlub2RlIGNvcnJlY3RseSBhZnRlciBzZXRhY2wNCiAgICAgIE5GUzogRml4IHVwIG5mc19w b3N0X29wX3VwZGF0ZV9pbm9kZSgpIHRvIGZvcmNlIGN0aW1lIHVwZGF0ZXMNCiAgICAgIE5GU3Y0 OiBBbHdheXMgY2xlYXIgdGhlIHBORlMgbGF5b3V0IHdoZW4gaGFuZGxpbmcgRVNUQUxFDQogICAg ICBwTkZTOiBSZWZhY3RvciBuZnM0X2xheW91dGdldF9yZWxlYXNlKCkNCiAgICAgIE5GU3Y0L3Bu ZnM6IEVuc3VyZSBwbmZzX3BhcnNlX2xnb3BlbigpIHdvbid0IHRyeSB0byBwYXJzZSB1bmluaXRp YWxpc2VkIGRhdGENCiAgICAgIE5GU3Y0L3BuZnM6IERvbid0IHN3aXRjaCBvZmYgbGF5b3V0Z2V0 LW9uLW9wZW4gZm9yIHRyYW5zaWVudCBlcnJvcnMNCiAgICAgIHBORlM6IERvbid0IHNlbmQgTEFZ T1VUR0VUIG9uIE9QRU4gZm9yIHJlYWQsIGlmIHdlIGFscmVhZHkgaGF2ZSBjYWNoZWQgZGF0YQ0K ICAgICAgcG5mczogRG9uJ3QgY2FsbCBjb21taXQgb24gZmFpbGVkIGxheW91dGdldC1vbi1vcGVu DQogICAgICBwbmZzOiBEb24ndCByZWxlYXNlIHRoZSBzZXF1ZW5jZSBzbG90IHVudGlsIHdlJ3Zl IHByb2Nlc3NlZCBsYXlvdXRnZXQgb24gb3Blbg0KICAgICAgTkZTdjQ6IERvbid0IHJlcXVlc3Qg c2l6ZStjaGFuZ2UgYXR0cmlidXRlIGlmIHRoZXkgYXJlIGRlbGVnYXRlZCB0byB1cw0KICAgICAg TkZTOiBQYXNzIHRoZSBpbm9kZSBkb3duIHRvIHRoZSBnZXRhdHRyKCkgY2FsbGJhY2sNCiAgICAg IE5GU3Y0OiBEb24ndCBhc2sgZm9yIGRlbGVnYXRlZCBhdHRyaWJ1dGVzIHdoZW4gcmV2YWxpZGF0 aW5nIHRoZSBpbm9kZQ0KICAgICAgTkZTdjQ6IERvbid0IGFzayBmb3IgZGVsZWdhdGVkIGF0dHJp YnV0ZXMgd2hlbiBhZGRpbmcgYSBoYXJkIGxpbmsNCiAgICAgIE5GU3Y0OiBJZ25vcmUgTkZTX0lO T19SRVZBTF9GT1JDRUQgaW4gbmZzNF9wcm9jX2FjY2Vzcw0KICAgICAgTkZTdjQ6IEVuc3VyZSB0 aGUgaW5vZGUgaXMgY2xlYW4gd2hlbiB3ZSBzZXQgYSBkZWxlZ2F0aW9uDQogICAgICBORlM6IGZp eCB1cCBuZnNfc2V0YXR0cl91cGRhdGVfaW5vZGUNCiAgICAgIE5GUzogRml4IGF0dHJpYnV0ZSBy ZXZhbGlkYXRpb24NCiAgICAgIE5GUzogSW1wcm92ZSBjYWNoaW5nIHdoaWxlIGhvbGRpbmcgYSBk ZWxlZ2F0aW9uDQogICAgICBORlM6IElnbm9yZSBORlNfSU5PX1JFVkFMX0ZPUkNFRCBpbiBuZnNf Y2hlY2tfaW5vZGVfYXR0cmlidXRlcygpDQogICAgICBORlM6IEZpbHRlciBjYWNoZSBpbnZhbGlk YXRpb24gd2hlbiBob2xkaW5nIGEgZGVsZWdhdGlvbg0KICAgICAgTWVyZ2UgdGFnICduZnMtcmRt YS1mb3ItNC4xOC0xJyBvZiBnaXQ6Ly9naXQubGludXgtbmZzLm9yZy9wcm9qZWN0cy9hbm5hL2xp bnV4LW5mcw0KICAgICAgTkZTdjQ6IEZpeCBhIGNvbXBpbGVyIHdhcm5pbmcgd2hlbiBDT05GSUdf TkZTX1Y0XzEgaXMgdW5kZWZpbmVkDQogICAgICBORlN2NDogUmV0dXJuIE5GUzRFUlJfREVMQVkg d2hlbiBhIGRlbGVnYXRpb24gcmVjYWxsIGZhaWxzIGR1ZSB0byBpZ3JhYigpDQogICAgICBORlN2 NDogUmV0dXJuIE5GUzRFUlJfREVMQVkgd2hlbiBhIGxheW91dCByZWNhbGwgZmFpbHMgZHVlIHRv IGlncmFiKCkNCiAgICAgIE5GU3Y0OiBSZXZlcnQgY29tbWl0IDVmODNkODZjZjUzMWQgKCJORlN2 NC54OiBGaXggd3JhcGFyb3VuZCBpc3N1ZXMuLiIpDQogICAgICBORlN2NDogRml4IGEgdHlwbyBp biBuZnM0MV9zZXF1ZW5jZV9wcm9jZXNzDQogICAgICBORlN2NC4xOiBGaXggdGhlIGNsaWVudCBi ZWhhdmlvdXIgb24gTkZTNEVSUl9TRVFfRkFMU0VfUkVUUlkNCg0KIGZzL25mcy9jYWxsYmFja19w cm9jLmMgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICA0MyArKy0tDQogZnMvbmZzL2NsaWVudC5jICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICAzICstDQogZnMvbmZzL2RlbGVnYXRpb24uYyAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgIDg2ICsrKysrLS0NCiBmcy9uZnMvZGlyLmMgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgNTEgKysrLQ0KIGZzL25mcy9leHBvcnQuYyAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAgMiArLQ0KIGZzL25mcy9mbGV4ZmlsZWxheW91dC9m bGV4ZmlsZWxheW91dC5jICAgICB8ICAgMSArDQogZnMvbmZzL2lub2RlLmMgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgMTI2ICsrKysrKystLS0NCiBmcy9uZnMvbmZzM3Byb2MuYyAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgMTMgKy0NCiBmcy9uZnMvbmZzNDJwcm9jLmMgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgIDYgKy0NCiBmcy9uZnMvbmZzNF9mcy5oICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgMjcgKy0NCiBmcy9uZnMvbmZzNGlkbWFwLmMgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgIDUgKy0NCiBmcy9uZnMvbmZzNHByb2MuYyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgfCAzOTEgKysrKysrKysrKysrKy0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCiBmcy9uZnMvbmZz NHN0YXRlLmMgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgIDggKw0KIGZzL25mcy9uZnM0eGRy LmMgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICA2NSArKysrLQ0KIGZzL25mcy9wbmZzLmMg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8IDMzMSArKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKysrKyst LS0NCiBmcy9uZnMvcG5mcy5oICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgMjggKyst DQogZnMvbmZzL3Byb2MuYyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgIDEzICstDQog ZnMvbmZzL3VubGluay5jICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgIDIwICstDQogZnMv bmZzL3dyaXRlLmMgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgIDEwICstDQogaW5jbHVk ZS9saW51eC9uZnNfZnNfc2IuaCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICAyICsNCiBpbmNsdWRlL2xp bnV4L25mc194ZHIuaCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgMTUgKy0NCiBpbmNsdWRlL2xpbnV4 L3JjdWxpc3QuaCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgMTMgKw0KIGluY2x1ZGUvbGludXgvc3Vu cnBjL3JwY19yZG1hLmggICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAgMSArDQogaW5jbHVkZS9saW51eC9zdW5ycGMv eHBydC5oICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICA2ICstDQogaW5jbHVkZS9saW51eC9zdW5ycGMveHBy dHJkbWEuaCAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICAxICsNCiBpbmNsdWRlL3RyYWNlL2V2ZW50cy9ycGNyZG1h LmggICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgNzYgKysrKy0tDQogbmV0L3N1bnJwYy9jbG50LmMgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICAxICsNCiBuZXQvc3VucnBjL3hwcnQuYyAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgMTcgKy0NCiBuZXQvc3VucnBjL3hwcnRyZG1hL2JhY2tjaGFubmVsLmMg ICAgICAgICAgfCAxMDUgKysrLS0tLS0NCiBuZXQvc3VucnBjL3hwcnRyZG1hL2Ztcl9vcHMuYyAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgMjMgKysNCiBuZXQvc3VucnBjL3hwcnRyZG1hL2Zyd3Jfb3BzLmMgICAg ICAgICAgICAgfCAgMzEgKystDQogbmV0L3N1bnJwYy94cHJ0cmRtYS9tb2R1bGUuYyAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIHwgICAxICsNCiBuZXQvc3VucnBjL3hwcnRyZG1hL3JwY19yZG1hLmMgICAgICAgICAg ICAgfCAgNjYgKystLS0NCiBuZXQvc3VucnBjL3hwcnRyZG1hL3N2Y19yZG1hX2JhY2tjaGFubmVs LmMgfCAgIDEgKw0KIG5ldC9zdW5ycGMveHBydHJkbWEvdHJhbnNwb3J0LmMgICAgICAgICAgICB8 ICA2NCArKystLQ0KIG5ldC9zdW5ycGMveHBydHJkbWEvdmVyYnMuYyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8 IDI5MSArKysrKysrKystLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCiBuZXQvc3VucnBjL3hwcnRyZG1hL3hwcnRfcmRt YS5oICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgMjYgKy0NCiBuZXQvc3VucnBjL3hwcnRzb2NrLmMgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgIDQgKw0KIDM4IGZpbGVzIGNoYW5nZWQsIDEyNDAgaW5zZXJ0aW9ucygr KSwgNzMzIGRlbGV0aW9ucygtKQ0KLS0gDQpUcm9uZCBNeWtsZWJ1c3QNCkxpbnV4IE5GUyBjbGll bnQgbWFpbnRhaW5lciwgSGFtbWVyc3BhY2UNCnRyb25kLm15a2xlYnVzdEBoYW1tZXJzcGFjZS5j b20NCg0K ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 2018-06-12 13:39 [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 Trond Myklebust @ 2018-06-12 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-06-12 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2018-06-12 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: trondmy, NeilBrown, Paul McKenney Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 6:39 AM Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com> wrote: > > NeilBrown (4): > rculist: add list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() Oh christ, people. Not another one of these. We need to start having a real rule in place where people DO NOT PLAY GAMES WITH RCU LISTS. Adding Paul McKenney to the list, since he clearly wasn't for the actual development, and the commit has no sign that it was sanity checked. This whole "let's re-start RCU walking in the middle after we've dropped the RCU read lock" needs a hell of a lot more thought than people seem to actually be giving it. Maybe the code is actually correct - it looks ok to me. But every time I see it I just shudder. What people actually want is to just have a cursor entry in an RCU list. I'd much rather have *that*, than have people make up these insane ad-hoc cursor entries that are insane and have horrible semantics. For example, looking at that commit e04bbf6b1bbe ("NFS: Avoid quadratic search when freeing delegations"), it even talks about the ad-hoc cursor entry not actually being reliable, and how that's ok because the code doesn't care. No, random odd behavior that is basically never ever going to be testable is *NOT* ok. So could we please have a cursor entry for RCU walking, and actually have a agreed-upon way to do this? Maybe even using the low bit in the "next" field to mark a cursor entry generically - the same way we already do for the HEAD field in the bit-locked lists, just on the actual entries _on_ the list instead. Because we now have *two* of these odd special "restart the loop in the middle" come in during the same merge window. That really implies to me that we should have a _proper_ solution for the problem, not this horribly nasty case where people make up their own pseudo-cursors that have odd and questionable semantics. Paul, comments? Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 2018-06-12 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds @ 2018-06-12 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-06-12 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2018-06-12 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: trondmy, NeilBrown, Paul McKenney Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:42 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > So could we please have a cursor entry for RCU walking, and actually > have a agreed-upon way to do this? Maybe even using the low bit in the > "next" field to mark a cursor entry generically - the same way we > already do for the HEAD field in the bit-locked lists, just on the > actual entries _on_ the list instead. The real problem with a RCU cursor is that the lifetime of the cursor is also RCU extended, so you can't do the traditional "just allocate the cursor entry on the stack" that you can with synchronous locked lists. That makes it slightly more inconvenient to do simple cursors. The dcache code has a fairly clean "dcache cursor", but it does use a whole "struct dentry" for it (and it depends on "next_positive()" to just skip them because dursors are never _positive_ dentries, so there's some subtlety there). But at least it's a very explicit cursor model, not that odd delegation inode that seems to have a life as a real inode too. So maybe a generic rcu-list cursor is too hard to do sanely, but can we at least encourage that very explicit cursor model that is *only* a cursor, and might not be touched/moved/reallocated by something else? Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 2018-06-12 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds @ 2018-06-12 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-06-12 22:01 ` NeilBrown 2018-06-13 1:04 ` Paul E. McKenney 0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2018-06-12 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: trondmy, NeilBrown, Paul McKenney Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List Final note (for now) on this: I've merged the nfs code, but I really am obviously not happy with these crazy random ad-hoc cursor-not-cursor list games. Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 2018-06-12 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds @ 2018-06-12 22:01 ` NeilBrown 2018-06-13 1:04 ` Paul E. McKenney 1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: NeilBrown @ 2018-06-12 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds, trondmy, Paul McKenney Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2352 bytes --] On Tue, Jun 12 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Final note (for now) on this: I've merged the nfs code, but I really > am obviously not happy with these crazy random ad-hoc > cursor-not-cursor list games. > > Linus Hi Linus, thanks for merging the code despite your reservations. Yes, we could create a generic rcu-list cursor. I have given it some thought but didn't like the added complexity. As there were existing objects in the list that could be used as a cursor, that seemed to me to be the better solution. As you say, and cursor would need to be allocated from a slab, not on the stack. We could use a SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU and not need to use rcu to delay the freeing. The lsb in the next pointer of the cursor would be 1 to indicate the cursor. Any iteration of the list would need to look out for this flag. When found it would need to skip over any cursors to the next non-cursor, then repeat the skip and make sure it found the same non-cursor. This guards against the cursor moving while it is being examined. Any walk that needed to place a cursor would need to get an exclusive lock on the list from the start. This is more locking overhead than just grabbing the lock to optimistically take a reference on the "current" item which I did in the NFS patch. If the lists were normally short that might not be a problem. In this case the list can get quite long so the extra locking might be noticeable. Deleting objects from the list would need to be careful to preserve the flag bit, but that is the least difficult part. FYI I have an open proposal to improve the cursor used by rhashtable for rhashtable_walk - it sometimes needs to drop out of RCU in the middle of a bucket chain. In that case the chain is normally short (16 is considered so long that the hash must have been compromised) and I propose an insertion sort to keep the addresses of objects in numerical order. This way the address of the last object found can work as a stable cursor - we just search through the list until an object has a larger address. So my perspective is that while an rcu_cursor_list could be developed, I'm not sure it would always (or ever?) be the best solution to a given problem. I can turn these thoughts into a patch if you like and see what people think. Thanks, NeilBrown [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 2018-06-12 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-06-12 22:01 ` NeilBrown @ 2018-06-13 1:04 ` Paul E. McKenney 2018-06-13 1:11 ` Linus Torvalds 1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-06-13 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: trondmy, NeilBrown, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:08:31AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Final note (for now) on this: I've merged the nfs code, but I really > am obviously not happy with these crazy random ad-hoc > cursor-not-cursor list games. We did review this one, and Neil did make requested changes to the comment header and documentation. However, as you say, I will push back harder on future RCU list traversal macros. Thanx, Paul ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 2018-06-13 1:04 ` Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-06-13 1:11 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-06-13 1:39 ` Paul E. McKenney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Linus Torvalds @ 2018-06-13 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul McKenney Cc: trondmy, NeilBrown, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 6:02 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > We did review this one, and Neil did make requested changes to the comment > header and documentation. Oh, I checked the commit for "acked-by" from you and didn't see any, so I was assuming this was just Neil and Trond on their own.. Linus ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 2018-06-13 1:11 ` Linus Torvalds @ 2018-06-13 1:39 ` Paul E. McKenney 2018-06-13 1:42 ` NeilBrown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-06-13 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: trondmy, NeilBrown, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 06:11:50PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 6:02 PM Paul E. McKenney > <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > We did review this one, and Neil did make requested changes to the comment > > header and documentation. > > Oh, I checked the commit for "acked-by" from you and didn't see any, > so I was assuming this was just Neil and Trond on their own.. Hmmm... I gave them a Reviewed-by, but perhaps it got lost. http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180501141404.GD26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com Thanx, Paul ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 2018-06-13 1:39 ` Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-06-13 1:42 ` NeilBrown 2018-06-13 10:06 ` Paul E. McKenney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: NeilBrown @ 2018-06-13 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: paulmck, Linus Torvalds Cc: trondmy, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 856 bytes --] On Tue, Jun 12 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 06:11:50PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 6:02 PM Paul E. McKenney >> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> > >> > We did review this one, and Neil did make requested changes to the comment >> > header and documentation. >> >> Oh, I checked the commit for "acked-by" from you and didn't see any, >> so I was assuming this was just Neil and Trond on their own.. > > Hmmm... I gave them a Reviewed-by, but perhaps it got lost. > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180501141404.GD26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > Thanx, Paul Sorry about that. I think I planned to add it after I heard back from Trond what he thought of the patch, but I didn't hear anything until it landed. I'll try to be more proactive next time. Thanks, NeilBrown [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 2018-06-13 1:42 ` NeilBrown @ 2018-06-13 10:06 ` Paul E. McKenney 2018-06-18 4:22 ` [PATCH] rculist: improve documentation for list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() NeilBrown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-06-13 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: NeilBrown Cc: Linus Torvalds, trondmy, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:42:51AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 06:11:50PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 6:02 PM Paul E. McKenney > >> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > We did review this one, and Neil did make requested changes to the comment > >> > header and documentation. > >> > >> Oh, I checked the commit for "acked-by" from you and didn't see any, > >> so I was assuming this was just Neil and Trond on their own.. > > > > Hmmm... I gave them a Reviewed-by, but perhaps it got lost. > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180501141404.GD26088@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > Sorry about that. I think I planned to add it after I heard back from > Trond what he thought of the patch, but I didn't hear anything until it > landed. I'll try to be more proactive next time. Not a problem from my viewpoint. There may come a time when I need to care about contribution metrics, but I don't need to at the moment. ;-) Thanx, Paul ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] rculist: improve documentation for list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() 2018-06-13 10:06 ` Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-06-18 4:22 ` NeilBrown 2018-06-18 17:01 ` Paul E. McKenney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: NeilBrown @ 2018-06-18 4:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: paulmck Cc: Linus Torvalds, trondmy, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3322 bytes --] Unfortunately the patch for adding list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() wasn't the final patch after all review. It is functionally correct but the documentation was incomplete. This patch adds this missing documentation which includes an update to the documentation for list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() to match the documentation for the new list_for_each_entry_from_rcu(), and adds list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() and the already existing hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu() to section 7 of whatisRCU.txt. Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> --- Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 2 ++ include/linux/rculist.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt index 65eb856526b7..d43524493fb3 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt @@ -816,11 +816,13 @@ RCU list traversal: list_next_rcu list_for_each_entry_rcu list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu + list_for_each_entry_from_rcu hlist_first_rcu hlist_next_rcu hlist_pprev_rcu hlist_for_each_entry_rcu hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh + hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh hlist_nulls_first_rcu diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h index 36df6ccbc874..4786c2235b98 100644 --- a/include/linux/rculist.h +++ b/include/linux/rculist.h @@ -396,7 +396,16 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, * @member: the name of the list_head within the struct. * * Continue to iterate over list of given type, continuing after - * the current position. + * the current position which must have been in the list when the RCU read + * lock was taken. + * This would typically require either that you obtained the node from a + * previous walk of the list in the same RCU read-side critical section, or + * that you held some sort of non-RCU reference (such as a reference count) + * to keep the node alive *and* in the list. + * + * This iterator is similar to list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() except + * this starts after the given position and that one starts at the given + * position. */ #define list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(pos, head, member) \ for (pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member); \ @@ -411,6 +420,14 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, * * Iterate over the tail of a list starting from a given position, * which must have been in the list when the RCU read lock was taken. + * This would typically require either that you obtained the node from a + * previous walk of the list in the same RCU read-side critical section, or + * that you held some sort of non-RCU reference (such as a reference count) + * to keep the node alive *and* in the list. + * + * This iterator is similar to list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() except + * this starts from the given position and that one starts from the position + * after the given position. */ #define list_for_each_entry_from_rcu(pos, head, member) \ for (; &(pos)->member != (head); \ -- 2.14.0.rc0.dirty [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rculist: improve documentation for list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() 2018-06-18 4:22 ` [PATCH] rculist: improve documentation for list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() NeilBrown @ 2018-06-18 17:01 ` Paul E. McKenney 2018-06-20 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-06-18 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: NeilBrown Cc: Linus Torvalds, trondmy, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 02:22:40PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > Unfortunately the patch for adding list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() > wasn't the final patch after all review. It is functionally > correct but the documentation was incomplete. > > This patch adds this missing documentation which includes an update to > the documentation for list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() to match the > documentation for the new list_for_each_entry_from_rcu(), and adds > list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() and the already existing > hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu() to section 7 of whatisRCU.txt. > > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Once I rebase my commits to v4.18-rc1, I will apply this, thank you! (If you were wanting something else to happen with this patch, please let me know.) Thanx, Paul > --- > Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 2 ++ > include/linux/rculist.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt > index 65eb856526b7..d43524493fb3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt > @@ -816,11 +816,13 @@ RCU list traversal: > list_next_rcu > list_for_each_entry_rcu > list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu > + list_for_each_entry_from_rcu > hlist_first_rcu > hlist_next_rcu > hlist_pprev_rcu > hlist_for_each_entry_rcu > hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_bh > + hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu > hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu > hlist_for_each_entry_continue_rcu_bh > hlist_nulls_first_rcu > diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h > index 36df6ccbc874..4786c2235b98 100644 > --- a/include/linux/rculist.h > +++ b/include/linux/rculist.h > @@ -396,7 +396,16 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, > * @member: the name of the list_head within the struct. > * > * Continue to iterate over list of given type, continuing after > - * the current position. > + * the current position which must have been in the list when the RCU read > + * lock was taken. > + * This would typically require either that you obtained the node from a > + * previous walk of the list in the same RCU read-side critical section, or > + * that you held some sort of non-RCU reference (such as a reference count) > + * to keep the node alive *and* in the list. > + * > + * This iterator is similar to list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() except > + * this starts after the given position and that one starts at the given > + * position. > */ > #define list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(pos, head, member) \ > for (pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member); \ > @@ -411,6 +420,14 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list, > * > * Iterate over the tail of a list starting from a given position, > * which must have been in the list when the RCU read lock was taken. > + * This would typically require either that you obtained the node from a > + * previous walk of the list in the same RCU read-side critical section, or > + * that you held some sort of non-RCU reference (such as a reference count) > + * to keep the node alive *and* in the list. > + * > + * This iterator is similar to list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() except > + * this starts from the given position and that one starts from the position > + * after the given position. > */ > #define list_for_each_entry_from_rcu(pos, head, member) \ > for (; &(pos)->member != (head); \ > -- > 2.14.0.rc0.dirty > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rculist: improve documentation for list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() 2018-06-18 17:01 ` Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-06-20 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-06-20 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: NeilBrown Cc: Linus Torvalds, trondmy, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux NFS Mailing List On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:01:11AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 02:22:40PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote: > > > > Unfortunately the patch for adding list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() > > wasn't the final patch after all review. It is functionally > > correct but the documentation was incomplete. > > > > This patch adds this missing documentation which includes an update to > > the documentation for list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() to match the > > documentation for the new list_for_each_entry_from_rcu(), and adds > > list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() and the already existing > > hlist_for_each_entry_from_rcu() to section 7 of whatisRCU.txt. > > > > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> > > Once I rebase my commits to v4.18-rc1, I will apply this, thank you! > > (If you were wanting something else to happen with this patch, please > let me know.) And hearing no objections, I have applied it. Thanx, Paul ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-20 15:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-06-12 13:39 [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for 4.18 Trond Myklebust 2018-06-12 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-06-12 18:06 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-06-12 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-06-12 22:01 ` NeilBrown 2018-06-13 1:04 ` Paul E. McKenney 2018-06-13 1:11 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-06-13 1:39 ` Paul E. McKenney 2018-06-13 1:42 ` NeilBrown 2018-06-13 10:06 ` Paul E. McKenney 2018-06-18 4:22 ` [PATCH] rculist: improve documentation for list_for_each_entry_from_rcu() NeilBrown 2018-06-18 17:01 ` Paul E. McKenney 2018-06-20 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).