linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>, Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsdcld: use WAL journal for faster commits
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 20:24:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211204012402.GA7805@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <915221EC-387C-4F50-83C6-8DCF02DD2A5D@oracle.com>

On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:35:11AM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> > On Dec 3, 2021, at 5:39 PM, Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 10:07:19PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >>>> On Dec 3, 2021, at 4:55 PM, Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
> >>> 
> >>> Currently nfsdcld is doing three fdatasyncs for each upcall.  Based on
> >>> SQLite documentation, WAL mode should also be safe, and I can confirm
> >>> from an strace that it results in only one fdatasync each.
> >>> 
> >>> This may be a bottleneck e.g. when lots of clients are being created or
> >>> expired at once (e.g. on reboot).
> >>> 
> >>> Not bothering with error checking, as this is just an optimization and
> >>> nfsdcld will still function without.  (Might be better to log something
> >>> on failure, though.)
> >> 
> >> I'm in full philosophical agreement for performance improvements
> >> in this area. There are some caveats for WAL:
> >> 
> >> - It requires SQLite v3.7.0 (2010). configure.ac may need to be
> >>   updated.
> > 
> > Makes sense.  But I dug around a bit, and how to do this is a total
> > mystery to me....
> 
> aclocal/libsqlite3.m4 has an SQLITE_VERSION_NUMBER check.

I looked got stuck trying to figure out why the #%^ it's comparing to
SQLITE_VERSION_NUMBER.  OK, I see now, it's just some sanity check.
Here's take 2.

--b.

From c22d3a2d8576273934773fefac933d4f8e04776b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 10:27:53 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] nfsdcld: use WAL journal for faster commits

Currently nfsdcld is doing three fdatasyncs for each upcall.  Based on
SQLite documentation, WAL mode should also be safe, and I can confirm
from an strace that it results in only one fdatasync each.

This may be a bottleneck e.g. when lots of clients are being created or
expired at once (e.g. on reboot).

Not bothering with error checking, as this is just an optimization and
nfsdcld will still function without.  (Might be better to log something
on failure, though.)

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
 aclocal/libsqlite3.m4  | 2 +-
 utils/nfsdcld/sqlite.c | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/aclocal/libsqlite3.m4 b/aclocal/libsqlite3.m4
index 8c38993cbba8..c3beb4d56f0c 100644
--- a/aclocal/libsqlite3.m4
+++ b/aclocal/libsqlite3.m4
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ AC_DEFUN([AC_SQLITE3_VERS], [
 		int vers = sqlite3_libversion_number();
 
 		return vers != SQLITE_VERSION_NUMBER ||
-			vers < 3003000;
+			vers < 3007000;
 	}
        ], [libsqlite3_cv_is_recent=yes], [libsqlite3_cv_is_recent=no],
        [libsqlite3_cv_is_recent=unknown])
diff --git a/utils/nfsdcld/sqlite.c b/utils/nfsdcld/sqlite.c
index 03016fb95823..eabb0daa95f5 100644
--- a/utils/nfsdcld/sqlite.c
+++ b/utils/nfsdcld/sqlite.c
@@ -826,6 +826,8 @@ sqlite_prepare_dbh(const char *topdir)
 		goto out_close;
 	}
 
+	sqlite3_exec(dbh, "PRAGMA journal_mode = WAL;", NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
 	ret = sqlite_query_schema_version();
 	switch (ret) {
 	case CLD_SQLITE_LATEST_SCHEMA_VERSION:
-- 
2.33.1


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-04  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-29  0:56 [PATCH RFC v5 0/2] nfsd: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server Dai Ngo
2021-09-29  0:56 ` [PATCH RFC v5 1/2] fs/lock: add new callback, lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations Dai Ngo
2021-09-29  0:56 ` [PATCH RFC v5 2/2] nfsd: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server Dai Ngo
2021-10-01 20:53 ` [PATCH RFC v5 0/2] " J. Bruce Fields
2021-10-01 21:41   ` dai.ngo
2021-10-01 23:03     ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-11-16 23:06     ` dai.ngo
2021-11-17 14:14       ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-11-17 17:59         ` dai.ngo
2021-11-17 21:46           ` dai.ngo
2021-11-18  0:34             ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-11-22  3:04               ` dai.ngo
2021-11-29 17:13                 ` dai.ngo
2021-11-29 17:30                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-11-29 18:32                     ` dai.ngo
2021-11-29 19:03                       ` Chuck Lever III
2021-11-29 19:13                         ` Bruce Fields
2021-11-29 19:39                           ` dai.ngo
2021-11-29 19:36                         ` dai.ngo
2021-11-29 21:01                           ` dai.ngo
2021-11-29 21:10                           ` Chuck Lever III
2021-11-30  0:11                             ` dai.ngo
2021-11-30  1:42                               ` Chuck Lever III
2021-11-30  4:08                                 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-11-30  4:47                                   ` Chuck Lever III
2021-11-30  4:57                                     ` Trond Myklebust
2021-11-30  7:22                                       ` dai.ngo
2021-11-30 13:37                                         ` Trond Myklebust
2021-12-01  3:52                                           ` dai.ngo
2021-12-01 14:19                                             ` bfields
2021-11-30 15:36                                         ` Chuck Lever III
2021-11-30 16:05                                           ` Bruce Fields
2021-11-30 16:14                                             ` Trond Myklebust
2021-11-30 19:01                                               ` bfields
2021-11-30  7:13                                 ` dai.ngo
2021-11-30 15:32                                   ` Bruce Fields
2021-12-01  3:50                                     ` dai.ngo
2021-12-01 14:36                                       ` Bruce Fields
2021-12-01 14:51                                         ` Bruce Fields
2021-12-01 18:47                                           ` dai.ngo
2021-12-01 19:25                                             ` Bruce Fields
2021-12-02 17:53                                           ` Chuck Lever III
2021-12-01 17:42                                         ` Bruce Fields
2021-12-01 18:03                                           ` Bruce Fields
2021-12-01 19:50                                             ` Bruce Fields
2021-12-03 21:22                                               ` Bruce Fields
2021-12-03 21:55                                                 ` [PATCH] nfsdcld: use WAL journal for faster commits Bruce Fields
2021-12-03 22:07                                                   ` Chuck Lever III
2021-12-03 22:39                                                     ` Bruce Fields
2021-12-04  0:35                                                       ` Chuck Lever III
2021-12-04  1:24                                                         ` Bruce Fields [this message]
2021-12-06 15:46                                                           ` Chuck Lever III
2022-01-04 22:24                                                             ` Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211204012402.GA7805@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).