Re: [regression] Bug 217165 - NFS cache stops working if accessed from process with PPID of 1

Re: [regression] Bug 217165 - NFS cache stops working if accessed from process with PPID of 1

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

[adding the author of the culprit, the NFS maintainers & list and lkml
to the list of recipients]

On 10.03.23 10:42, Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)
wrote:
> [TLDR: Just adding a regression reported to bko to the tracking]
> 
> Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. I noticed a
> regression reported in bugzilla.kernel.org that likely will be handled
> there (normally the NFS developer do that),

Seems I was wrong in this case or in general, as that bug report didn't
get a single reply yet. Hence this mail to ensure the right people have
it on their radar. Or was some progress to address this made and I just
missed it?

> nevertheless I'd like to add
> to the tracking to ensure it's doesn't fall through the cracks in the end:
> 
> #regzbot introduced: 029085b8949f5d269ae
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217165
> #regzbot title: nfs: cache stops working if accessed from process with
> PPID of 1
> #regzbot ignore-activity
> 
> See the ticket for details, there were a few replies already.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.

#regzbot poke

Re: [regression] Bug 217165 - NFS cache stops working if accessed from process with PPID of 1

[Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)]

[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression
tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]

On 20.03.23 13:40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> [adding the author of the culprit, the NFS maintainers & list and lkml
> to the list of recipients]

Chengen Du, thx for replying in bugzilla!

> On 10.03.23 10:42, Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)
> wrote:
> 
> Seems I was wrong in this case or in general, as that bug report didn't
> get a single reply yet. Hence this mail to ensure the right people have
> it on their radar. Or was some progress to address this made and I just
> missed it?
> 
>> nevertheless I'd like to add
>> to the tracking to ensure it's doesn't fall through the cracks in the end:
>>
>> #regzbot introduced: 029085b8949f5d269ae
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217165
>> #regzbot title: nfs: cache stops working if accessed from process with
>> PPID of 1
>> #regzbot ignore-activity

#regzbot fix: 21fd9e8700de86d1169f6336e97d7a74916ed0
#regzbot ignore-activity

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.