From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libnvdimm/region: Update is_nvdimm_sync check to handle volatile regions
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:24:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <886139c5-5941-1e51-95bf-9941d2276b95@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4ij2+i9O15ZTx3VSLEF7wQM5ukfncVY42g4S1VWX8zTrA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dan,
On 9/24/19 10:42 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 9:57 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:43 AM Aneesh Kumar K.V
>> <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We should consider volatile regions synchronous so that we are resilient to
>>> OS crashes. This is needed when we have hypervisor like KVM exporting a ramdisk
>>> as pmem dimms.
>>
>> We have a hard time understanding what agent is being referenced when
>> we use "we" in a patch changelog. We would prefer that we consider not
>> using "we" in favor of explicitly named agents, or otherwise review
>> the changelog to make sure that "we" is clearly discernable. We will
>> fix it up this time when applying, but we hope we have made it clear
>> how confusing liberal use of "we" can be.
>
> To be clear, I'm not strictly opposed to using "we" when it is
> established which we is being referred and stays constant throughout
> the description. This instance caught my eye again because the first
> couple "we"s seems to be the kernel, and the last we seems to be a
> user platform configuration.
>
Thanks for the feedback. I will take extra care to clearly indicate the
component/agent next time.
Thanks for taking the patch.
-aneesh
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-25 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-24 11:43 [PATCH] libnvdimm/region: Update is_nvdimm_sync check to handle volatile regions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-09-24 11:52 ` Pankaj Gupta
2019-09-24 16:57 ` Dan Williams
2019-09-24 17:12 ` Dan Williams
2019-09-25 3:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=886139c5-5941-1e51-95bf-9941d2276b95@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).