From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Barret Rhoden" <brho@google.com>,
"Zhang, Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
"KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>, "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
rkrcmar@redhat.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] mm: Add support for exposing if dev_pagemap supports refcount pinning
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 12:21:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <97943d2ed62e6887f4ba51b985ef4fb5478bc586.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gZkx9zRsKkVhrmPG7SyjPEycp0neFnECmSADZNLuDOpQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 11:47 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:25 AM Alexander Duyck
> <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add a means of exposing if a pagemap supports refcount pinning. I am doing
> > this to expose if a given pagemap has backing struct pages that will allow
> > for the reference count of the page to be incremented to lock the page
> > into place.
> >
> > The KVM code already has several spots where it was trying to use a
> > pfn_valid check combined with a PageReserved check to determien if it could
> > take a reference on the page. I am adding this check so in the case of the
> > page having the reserved flag checked we can check the pagemap for the page
> > to determine if we might fall into the special DAX case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 2 ++
> > include/linux/memremap.h | 5 ++++-
> > include/linux/mm.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> > index 6f22272e8d80..7a4a85bcf7f4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> > @@ -640,6 +640,8 @@ static int __nvdimm_setup_pfn(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
> > } else
> > return -ENXIO;
> >
> > + pgmap->support_refcount_pinning = true;
> > +
>
> There should be no dev_pagemap instance instance where this isn't
> true, so I'm missing why this is needed?
I thought in the case of HMM there were instances where you couldn't
pin the page, isn't there? Specifically I am thinking of the definition
of MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC:
Device memory that is cache coherent from device and CPU point of
view. This is use on platform that have an advance system bus (like
CAPI or CCIX). A driver can hotplug the device memory using
ZONE_DEVICE and with that memory type. Any page of a process can be
migrated to such memory. However no one should be allow to pin such
memory so that it can always be evicted.
It sounds like MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC and MMIO would want to fall into
the same category here in order to allow a hot-plug event to remove the
device and take the memory with it, or is my understanding on this not
correct?
Thanks.
- Alex
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-03 19:25 [PATCH RFC 0/3] Fix KVM misinterpreting Reserved page as an MMIO page Alexander Duyck
2018-12-03 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] kvm: Split use cases for kvm_is_reserved_pfn to kvm_is_refcounted_pfn Alexander Duyck
2018-12-03 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] mm: Add support for exposing if dev_pagemap supports refcount pinning Alexander Duyck
2018-12-03 19:47 ` Dan Williams
2018-12-03 20:21 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2018-12-03 20:31 ` Dan Williams
2018-12-03 20:53 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-12-03 21:05 ` Dan Williams
2018-12-03 21:50 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-12-04 19:08 ` Dan Williams
2018-12-04 22:51 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-12-04 23:24 ` Barret Rhoden
2018-12-05 0:01 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-12-05 0:26 ` Dan Williams
2018-12-05 8:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-12-03 19:25 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] kvm: Add additional check to determine if a page is refcounted Alexander Duyck
2018-12-04 6:59 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] Fix KVM misinterpreting Reserved page as an MMIO page Yi Zhang
2018-12-04 18:45 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=97943d2ed62e6887f4ba51b985ef4fb5478bc586.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brho@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).