* [PATCH 3/7] dax: Add missing annotation for wait_entry_unlocked()
[not found] ` <20200331204643.11262-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
@ 2020-03-31 20:46 ` Jules Irenge
2020-04-01 10:01 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jules Irenge @ 2020-03-31 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: boqun.feng, Alexander Viro, Matthew Wilcox, Jan Kara,
open list:FILESYSTEMS VFS and infrastructure,
open list:FILESYSTEM DIRECT ACCESS DAX
Sparse reports a warning at wait_entry_unlocked()
warning: context imbalance in wait_entry_unlocked()
- unexpected unlock
The root cause is the missing annotation at wait_entry_unlocked()
Add the missing __releases(xa) annotation.
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
---
fs/dax.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index 1f1f0201cad1..adcd2a57fbad 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static void *get_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, unsigned int order)
* After we call xas_unlock_irq(), we cannot touch xas->xa.
*/
static void wait_entry_unlocked(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry)
+ __releases(xa)
{
struct wait_exceptional_entry_queue ewait;
wait_queue_head_t *wq;
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/7] dax: Add missing annotation for wait_entry_unlocked()
2020-03-31 20:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] dax: Add missing annotation for wait_entry_unlocked() Jules Irenge
@ 2020-04-01 10:01 ` Jan Kara
2020-04-01 16:04 ` Jules Irenge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2020-04-01 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jules Irenge
Cc: linux-kernel, boqun.feng, Alexander Viro, Matthew Wilcox,
Jan Kara, open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure),
open list:FILESYSTEM DIRECT ACCESS (DAX)
On Tue 31-03-20 21:46:39, Jules Irenge wrote:
> Sparse reports a warning at wait_entry_unlocked()
>
> warning: context imbalance in wait_entry_unlocked()
> - unexpected unlock
>
> The root cause is the missing annotation at wait_entry_unlocked()
> Add the missing __releases(xa) annotation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/dax.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 1f1f0201cad1..adcd2a57fbad 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static void *get_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, unsigned int order)
> * After we call xas_unlock_irq(), we cannot touch xas->xa.
> */
> static void wait_entry_unlocked(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry)
> + __releases(xa)
Thanks for the patch but is this a proper sparse annotation? I'd rather
expect something like __releases(xas->xa->xa_lock) here...
Honza
> {
> struct wait_exceptional_entry_queue ewait;
> wait_queue_head_t *wq;
> --
> 2.24.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/7] dax: Add missing annotation for wait_entry_unlocked()
2020-04-01 10:01 ` Jan Kara
@ 2020-04-01 16:04 ` Jules Irenge
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jules Irenge @ 2020-04-01 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara
Cc: Jules Irenge, linux-kernel, boqun.feng, Alexander Viro,
Matthew Wilcox, open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure),
open list:FILESYSTEM DIRECT ACCESS (DAX)
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 31-03-20 21:46:39, Jules Irenge wrote:
>> Sparse reports a warning at wait_entry_unlocked()
>>
>> warning: context imbalance in wait_entry_unlocked()
>> - unexpected unlock
>>
>> The root cause is the missing annotation at wait_entry_unlocked()
>> Add the missing __releases(xa) annotation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> fs/dax.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
>> index 1f1f0201cad1..adcd2a57fbad 100644
>> --- a/fs/dax.c
>> +++ b/fs/dax.c
>> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static void *get_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, unsigned int order)
>> * After we call xas_unlock_irq(), we cannot touch xas->xa.
>> */
>> static void wait_entry_unlocked(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry)
>> + __releases(xa)
>
> Thanks for the patch but is this a proper sparse annotation? I'd rather
> expect something like __releases(xas->xa->xa_lock) here...
>
> Honza
>
>> {
>> struct wait_exceptional_entry_queue ewait;
>> wait_queue_head_t *wq;
>> --
>> 2.24.1
>>
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR
>
Thanks for the kind reply. I learned and changed. If there is a further
issue, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thanks,
Jules
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-01 16:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <0/7>
[not found] ` <20200331204643.11262-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
2020-03-31 20:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] dax: Add missing annotation for wait_entry_unlocked() Jules Irenge
2020-04-01 10:01 ` Jan Kara
2020-04-01 16:04 ` Jules Irenge
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).