linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
	Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme/pci: default to simple suspend
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 15:37:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220208143751.GA25260@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220207160655.GB635727@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com>

On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 08:06:55AM -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> > I'd really prefer to sort this out at the platform level.  We can't work
> > around broken platforms in nvme forever.
> 
> I agree, but I'm not sure how to get everyone aligned.
> 
> How about this to resolve the regressions: if the platform doesn't
> provide StorageD3Enable property, can we just default to the simple
> shutdown method? We'd only use the nvme power management capabilities if
> the platform explicity says it doesn't want D3, making the default the
> same as the legacy behavior.

I don't think this will work, as most older platforms just won't have
that attribute at all, and non-ACPI platforms most certainly won't have
it.  We'll need more quirks in the core PCI/PM code like we did for the
AMD mobile platforms.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-08 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-01 16:50 [PATCH] nvme/pci: default to simple suspend Keith Busch
2022-02-01 17:49 ` Vidya Sagar
2022-02-02  7:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-02 16:03   ` Keith Busch
2022-02-04  7:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-07 16:06       ` Keith Busch
2022-02-08 14:37         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-02-08 17:14           ` Keith Busch
2022-02-09  7:48             ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-11 13:58 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-04-23  5:49   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220208143751.GA25260@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).