linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	<hch@lst.de>
Cc: shlomin@mellanox.com, jgg@mellanox.com, bvanassche@acm.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] nvmet-rdma: use SRQ per completion vector
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 03:44:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6149129e-eacb-7b16-0540-13166dc10e8e@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80ff5951-caad-1130-43d4-6239b9f6a143@grimberg.me>


On 3/27/2020 1:20 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>> @@ -954,7 +1039,7 @@ static void nvmet_rdma_free_dev(struct kref *ref)
>>           goto out_free_dev;
>>         if (nvmet_rdma_use_srq) {
>> -        ret = nvmet_rdma_init_srq(ndev);
>> +        ret = nvmet_rdma_init_srqs(ndev);
>>           if (ret)
>>               goto out_free_pd;
>>       }
>
> I'm wandering if we should fallback to normal rqs, probably not a
> good idea...
>
Yup, probably won't help since the possible errors are lack of memory 
and malfunctioning device.

>
>> @@ -1238,6 +1326,10 @@ static void nvmet_rdma_qp_event(struct 
>> ib_event *event, void *priv)
>>       case IB_EVENT_COMM_EST:
>>           rdma_notify(queue->cm_id, event->event);
>>           break;
>> +    case IB_EVENT_QP_LAST_WQE_REACHED:
>> +        pr_debug("received last WQE reached event for queue=0x%p\n",
>> +             queue);
>> +        break;
>
> Can you remind me when does this event come up? Why don't we see it 
> with normal queues?

Maybe this can help:

https://spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg59633.html


>
> Other than that, looks good Max,
>
> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>

_______________________________________________
linux-nvme mailing list
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-27  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-26 18:15 [PATCH v4 1/1] nvmet-rdma: use SRQ per completion vector Max Gurtovoy
2020-03-26 18:29 ` Laurence Oberman
2020-03-26 22:14   ` Max Gurtovoy
2020-03-26 23:20 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-03-27  0:44   ` Max Gurtovoy [this message]
2020-03-31 14:43     ` Max Gurtovoy
2020-03-31 15:06       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-01  8:33 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6149129e-eacb-7b16-0540-13166dc10e8e@mellanox.com \
    --to=maxg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=shlomin@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).