* Re: [PATCH v8 01/13] nvme-core: introduce nvme_ctrl_get_by_path() [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-2-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-06 23:33 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-06 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20190828215429.4572-3-logang@deltatee.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v8 02/13] nvme-core: export existing ctrl and ns interfaces [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-3-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-06 23:33 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-06 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20190828215429.4572-4-logang@deltatee.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v8 03/13] nvmet: add return value to nvmet_add_async_event() [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-4-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-06 23:34 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-06 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20190828215429.4572-5-logang@deltatee.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v8 04/13] nvmet: make nvmet_copy_ns_identifier() non-static [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-5-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-06 23:34 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-06 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20190828215429.4572-6-logang@deltatee.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v8 05/13] nvmet-passthru: update KConfig with config passthru option [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-6-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-06 23:35 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-06 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig This can be squashed to the next patch. No need for a separate patch to enable/disable code that only comes in a later patch. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20190828215429.4572-9-logang@deltatee.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v8 08/13] nvmet-core: don't check the data len for pt-ctrl [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-9-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-06 23:38 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-06 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig Makes sense to me, Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20190828215429.4572-10-logang@deltatee.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v8 09/13] nvmet-tcp: don't check data_len in nvmet_tcp_map_data() [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-10-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-06 23:39 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-06 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20190828215429.4572-11-logang@deltatee.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v8 10/13] nvmet-configfs: introduce passthru configfs interface [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-11-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-06 23:39 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-06 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20190828215429.4572-12-logang@deltatee.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v8 11/13] block: don't check blk_rq_is_passthrough() in blk_do_io_stat() [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-12-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-06 23:40 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-06 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig Looks good, Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20190828215429.4572-13-logang@deltatee.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v8 12/13] block: call blk_account_io_start() in blk_execute_rq_nowait() [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-13-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-06 23:41 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-06 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me> _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20190828215429.4572-14-logang@deltatee.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v8 13/13] nvmet-passthru: support block accounting [not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-14-logang@deltatee.com> @ 2019-09-07 0:00 ` Sagi Grimberg 2019-09-09 16:06 ` Logan Gunthorpe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-07 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig > Support block disk accounting by setting the RQF_IO_STAT flag > and gendisk in the request. > > After this change, IO counts will be reflected correctly in > /proc/diskstats for drives being used by passthru. > > Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> > --- > drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c > index 7557927a3451..63f12750a80d 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c > @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ static struct request *nvmet_passthru_blk_make_request(struct nvmet_req *req, > if (unlikely(IS_ERR(rq))) > return rq; > > + if (blk_queue_io_stat(q) && cmd->common.opcode != nvme_cmd_flush) > + rq->rq_flags |= RQF_IO_STAT; Does flush has data bytes in the request? Why the special casing? _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 13/13] nvmet-passthru: support block accounting 2019-09-07 0:00 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] nvmet-passthru: support block accounting Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-09 16:06 ` Logan Gunthorpe 2019-09-09 19:26 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-09-09 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sagi Grimberg, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig On 2019-09-06 6:00 p.m., Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >> Support block disk accounting by setting the RQF_IO_STAT flag >> and gendisk in the request. >> >> After this change, IO counts will be reflected correctly in >> /proc/diskstats for drives being used by passthru. >> >> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> >> --- >> drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >> index 7557927a3451..63f12750a80d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >> @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ static struct request *nvmet_passthru_blk_make_request(struct nvmet_req *req, >> if (unlikely(IS_ERR(rq))) >> return rq; >> >> + if (blk_queue_io_stat(q) && cmd->common.opcode != nvme_cmd_flush) >> + rq->rq_flags |= RQF_IO_STAT; Thanks for the review! > Does flush has data bytes in the request? Why the special casing? Well it was special cased in the vanilla blk account flow... But I think it's required to be special cased so the IO and in_flight counts don't count flushes (as they do not for regular block device traffic). Logan _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 13/13] nvmet-passthru: support block accounting 2019-09-09 16:06 ` Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-09-09 19:26 ` Sagi Grimberg 2019-09-09 19:32 ` Logan Gunthorpe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-09 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig >>> Support block disk accounting by setting the RQF_IO_STAT flag >>> and gendisk in the request. >>> >>> After this change, IO counts will be reflected correctly in >>> /proc/diskstats for drives being used by passthru. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c | 5 ++++- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>> index 7557927a3451..63f12750a80d 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>> @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ static struct request *nvmet_passthru_blk_make_request(struct nvmet_req *req, >>> if (unlikely(IS_ERR(rq))) >>> return rq; >>> >>> + if (blk_queue_io_stat(q) && cmd->common.opcode != nvme_cmd_flush) >>> + rq->rq_flags |= RQF_IO_STAT; > > Thanks for the review! > >> Does flush has data bytes in the request? Why the special casing? > > Well it was special cased in the vanilla blk account flow... But I think > it's required to be special cased so the IO and in_flight counts don't > count flushes (as they do not for regular block device traffic). I think that the accounting exclude I/O that is yielded from the flush sequence. Don't think its relevant here... _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 13/13] nvmet-passthru: support block accounting 2019-09-09 19:26 ` Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-09 19:32 ` Logan Gunthorpe 2019-09-09 23:15 ` Sagi Grimberg 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-09-09 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sagi Grimberg, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig On 2019-09-09 1:26 p.m., Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >>>> Support block disk accounting by setting the RQF_IO_STAT flag >>>> and gendisk in the request. >>>> >>>> After this change, IO counts will be reflected correctly in >>>> /proc/diskstats for drives being used by passthru. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c | 5 ++++- >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>>> index 7557927a3451..63f12750a80d 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>>> @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ static struct request *nvmet_passthru_blk_make_request(struct nvmet_req *req, >>>> if (unlikely(IS_ERR(rq))) >>>> return rq; >>>> >>>> + if (blk_queue_io_stat(q) && cmd->common.opcode != nvme_cmd_flush) >>>> + rq->rq_flags |= RQF_IO_STAT; >> >> Thanks for the review! >> >>> Does flush has data bytes in the request? Why the special casing? >> >> Well it was special cased in the vanilla blk account flow... But I think >> it's required to be special cased so the IO and in_flight counts don't >> count flushes (as they do not for regular block device traffic). > > I think that the accounting exclude I/O that is yielded from the flush > sequence. Don't think its relevant here... What? Per blk_account_io_done(), RQF_FLUSH_SEQ will not be set by us for passthru commands and I don't think it's appropriate to do so. Thus, if we set RQF_IO_STAT for passthru flush commands, they will be counted which we do not want. Logan _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 13/13] nvmet-passthru: support block accounting 2019-09-09 19:32 ` Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-09-09 23:15 ` Sagi Grimberg 2019-09-11 16:53 ` Logan Gunthorpe 0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-09 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Logan Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig >>>>> Support block disk accounting by setting the RQF_IO_STAT flag >>>>> and gendisk in the request. >>>>> >>>>> After this change, IO counts will be reflected correctly in >>>>> /proc/diskstats for drives being used by passthru. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c | 5 ++++- >>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>>>> index 7557927a3451..63f12750a80d 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>>>> @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ static struct request *nvmet_passthru_blk_make_request(struct nvmet_req *req, >>>>> if (unlikely(IS_ERR(rq))) >>>>> return rq; >>>>> >>>>> + if (blk_queue_io_stat(q) && cmd->common.opcode != nvme_cmd_flush) >>>>> + rq->rq_flags |= RQF_IO_STAT; >>> >>> Thanks for the review! >>> >>>> Does flush has data bytes in the request? Why the special casing? >>> >>> Well it was special cased in the vanilla blk account flow... But I think >>> it's required to be special cased so the IO and in_flight counts don't >>> count flushes (as they do not for regular block device traffic). >> >> I think that the accounting exclude I/O that is yielded from the flush >> sequence. Don't think its relevant here... > > What? Per blk_account_io_done(), RQF_FLUSH_SEQ will not be set by us for > passthru commands and I don't think it's appropriate to do so. Thus, if > we set RQF_IO_STAT for passthru flush commands, they will be counted > which we do not want. Have you considered to have nvmet_passthru_blk_make_request set RQF_FUA for nvme_cmd_flush? this way blk_insert_flush will be called and RQF_FLUSH_SEQ will be set and you don't need to worry about this special casing... _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v8 13/13] nvmet-passthru: support block accounting 2019-09-09 23:15 ` Sagi Grimberg @ 2019-09-11 16:53 ` Logan Gunthorpe 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Logan Gunthorpe @ 2019-09-11 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sagi Grimberg, linux-kernel, linux-nvme, linux-block, linux-fsdevel Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni, Stephen Bates, Jens Axboe, Keith Busch, Max Gurtovoy, Christoph Hellwig On 2019-09-09 5:15 p.m., Sagi Grimberg wrote: > >>>>>> Support block disk accounting by setting the RQF_IO_STAT flag >>>>>> and gendisk in the request. >>>>>> >>>>>> After this change, IO counts will be reflected correctly in >>>>>> /proc/diskstats for drives being used by passthru. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c | 5 ++++- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>>>>> b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>>>>> index 7557927a3451..63f12750a80d 100644 >>>>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-passthru.c >>>>>> @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ static struct request >>>>>> *nvmet_passthru_blk_make_request(struct nvmet_req *req, >>>>>> if (unlikely(IS_ERR(rq))) >>>>>> return rq; >>>>>> + if (blk_queue_io_stat(q) && cmd->common.opcode != >>>>>> nvme_cmd_flush) >>>>>> + rq->rq_flags |= RQF_IO_STAT; >>>> >>>> Thanks for the review! >>>> >>>>> Does flush has data bytes in the request? Why the special casing? >>>> >>>> Well it was special cased in the vanilla blk account flow... But I >>>> think >>>> it's required to be special cased so the IO and in_flight counts don't >>>> count flushes (as they do not for regular block device traffic). >>> >>> I think that the accounting exclude I/O that is yielded from the flush >>> sequence. Don't think its relevant here... >> >> What? Per blk_account_io_done(), RQF_FLUSH_SEQ will not be set by us for >> passthru commands and I don't think it's appropriate to do so. Thus, if >> we set RQF_IO_STAT for passthru flush commands, they will be counted >> which we do not want. > > Have you considered to have nvmet_passthru_blk_make_request set RQF_FUA > for nvme_cmd_flush? this way blk_insert_flush will be called and > RQF_FLUSH_SEQ will be set and you don't need to worry about this > special casing... Well, I haven't done that mostly because I'm not sure of all the side effects of doing so. However, I've tried it and everything seems to still work, so I'll make that change for v9 which I'll probably send out after the merge window. Logan _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-11 16:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20190828215429.4572-1-logang@deltatee.com>
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-2-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-06 23:33 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] nvme-core: introduce nvme_ctrl_get_by_path() Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-3-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-06 23:33 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] nvme-core: export existing ctrl and ns interfaces Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-4-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-06 23:34 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] nvmet: add return value to nvmet_add_async_event() Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-5-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-06 23:34 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] nvmet: make nvmet_copy_ns_identifier() non-static Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-6-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-06 23:35 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] nvmet-passthru: update KConfig with config passthru option Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-9-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-06 23:38 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] nvmet-core: don't check the data len for pt-ctrl Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-10-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-06 23:39 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] nvmet-tcp: don't check data_len in nvmet_tcp_map_data() Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-11-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-06 23:39 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] nvmet-configfs: introduce passthru configfs interface Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-12-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-06 23:40 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] block: don't check blk_rq_is_passthrough() in blk_do_io_stat() Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-13-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-06 23:41 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] block: call blk_account_io_start() in blk_execute_rq_nowait() Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <20190828215429.4572-14-logang@deltatee.com>
2019-09-07 0:00 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] nvmet-passthru: support block accounting Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-09 16:06 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-09-09 19:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-09 19:32 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-09-09 23:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-09-11 16:53 ` Logan Gunthorpe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).