linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dou Liyang <douliyangs@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com,
	shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com,
	sumit.saxena@broadcom.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, hch@lst.de,
	bhelgaas@google.com, douliyang1@huawei.com,
	Dou Liyang <douliyangs@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] irq/affinity: Add is_managed into struct irq_affinity_desc
Date: Tue,  4 Dec 2018 23:51:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181204155122.6327-3-douliyangs@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181204155122.6327-1-douliyangs@gmail.com>

Now, Linux uses the irq_affinity_desc to convey information.

As Kashyap and Sumit reported, in MSI/-x subsystem, the pre/post vectors
may be used to some extra reply queues for performance.

  https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=153543887027997&w=2

Their affinities are not NULL, but, they should be mapped as unmanaged
interrupts. So, only transfering the irq affinity assignments is not enough.

Add a new bit "is_managed" to convey the info in irq_affinity_desc and use
it in alloc_descs().

Reported-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Reported-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douliyangs@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/interrupt.h | 1 +
 kernel/irq/affinity.c     | 7 +++++++
 kernel/irq/irqdesc.c      | 9 +++++++--
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 71be303231e9..a12b3dbbc45e 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ struct irq_affinity {
  */
 struct irq_affinity_desc {
 	struct cpumask	mask;
+	unsigned int	is_managed : 1;
 };
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
index 1562a36e7c0f..d122575ba1b4 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -289,6 +289,13 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd)
 	for (; curvec < nvecs; curvec++)
 		cpumask_copy(&masks[curvec].mask, irq_default_affinity);
 
+	/*  Setup complementary information */
+	for (i = 0; i < nvecs; i++) {
+		if (i >= affd->pre_vectors && i < nvecs - affd->post_vectors)
+			masks[i].is_managed = 1;
+		else
+			masks[i].is_managed = 0;
+	}
 outnodemsk:
 	free_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
 	return masks;
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
index f87fa2b9935a..6b0821c144c0 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int alloc_descs(unsigned int start, unsigned int cnt, int node,
 	const struct irq_affinity_desc *cur_affinity= affinity;
 	const struct cpumask *mask = NULL;
 	struct irq_desc *desc;
-	unsigned int flags;
+	unsigned int flags = 0;
 	int i;
 
 	/* Validate affinity mask(s) */
@@ -468,11 +468,16 @@ static int alloc_descs(unsigned int start, unsigned int cnt, int node,
 		}
 	}
 
-	flags = affinity ? IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED | IRQD_MANAGED_SHUTDOWN : 0;
 	mask = NULL;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
 		if (affinity) {
+			if (affinity->is_managed) {
+				flags = IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED |
+					IRQD_MANAGED_SHUTDOWN;
+			} else {
+				flags = 0;
+			}
 			mask = &affinity->mask;
 			node = cpu_to_node(cpumask_first(mask));
 			affinity++;
-- 
2.17.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-04 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-04 15:51 [PATCH 0/3] irq/core: Fix and expand the irq affinity descriptor Dou Liyang
2018-12-04 15:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] genirq/core: Add a new interrupt " Dou Liyang
2018-12-04 15:51 ` Dou Liyang [this message]
2018-12-18 15:26   ` [PATCH 2/3] irq/affinity: Add is_managed into struct irq_affinity_desc Thomas Gleixner
2018-12-04 15:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] irq/affinity: Fix a possible breakage Dou Liyang
2018-12-05  8:28   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-12-11 16:27     ` Dou Liyang
2018-12-19 10:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] irq/core: Fix and expand the irq affinity descriptor Thomas Gleixner
2018-12-19 12:55   ` Sumit Saxena
2018-12-28  9:54     ` Sumit Saxena

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181204155122.6327-3-douliyangs@gmail.com \
    --to=douliyangs@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=douliyang1@huawei.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).