From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Cc: "marek.vasut@gmail.com" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] PCI: rcar: Recalculate inbound range alignment for each controller entry
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:20:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191028102048.GA4414@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYAPR01MB45441C49E8E4C33DDBB09071D8660@TYAPR01MB4544.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 08:35:32AM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> Hi Marek-san.
>
> > From: Marek Vasut, Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2019 3:27 AM
> >
> > Due to hardware constraints, the size of each inbound range entry
> > populated into the controller cannot be larger than the alignment
> > of the entry's start address. Currently, the alignment for each
> > "dma-ranges" inbound range is calculated only once for each range
> > and the increment for programming the controller is also derived
> > from it only once. Thus, a "dma-ranges" entry describing a memory
> > at 0x48000000 and size 0x38000000 would lead to multiple controller
> > entries, each 0x08000000 long.
>
> I added a debug code [1] and I confirmed that each entry is not 0x08000000 long [2].
>
> After fixed the commit log above,
So what does this mean in practice ? Does it mean that the commit log is
wrong or that the issue is not present as described, in the mainline
code ?
Please clarify and send a v5 accordingly.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> Reviewed-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
>
> And I tested on r8a7795-salvator-xs with my debug code. So,
>
> Tested-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
>
> Best regards,
> Yoshihiro Shimoda
>
> ---
> [1] Based on next-20191025 with this patch series:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> index fde6ec1..9bdd39e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> @@ -2684,7 +2684,7 @@
> 0x02000000 0 0x30000000 0 0x30000000 0 0x08000000
> 0x42000000 0 0x38000000 0 0x38000000 0 0x08000000>;
> /* Map all possible DDR as inbound ranges */
> - dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0 0x40000000 0 0x40000000 0 0x40000000>;
> + dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0 0x48000000 0 0x48000000 0 0x38000000>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 116 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <GIC_SPI 117 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <GIC_SPI 118 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> index 0dadccb..54ad977 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
> * Author: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> */
>
> +#define DEBUG
> +
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> @@ -1054,6 +1056,8 @@ static int rcar_pcie_inbound_ranges(struct rcar_pcie *pcie,
> mask = roundup_pow_of_two(size) - 1;
> mask &= ~0xf;
>
> + dev_dbg(pcie->dev, "idx%d: 0x%016llx..0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx\n",
> + idx, cpu_addr, size, pci_addr);
> /*
> * Set up 64-bit inbound regions as the range parser doesn't
> * distinguish between 32 and 64-bit types.
> ---
> [2]
> [ 0.374771] rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: idx0: 0x0000000048000000..0x0000000008000000 -> 0x0000000048000000
> [ 0.374777] rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: idx2: 0x0000000050000000..0x0000000010000000 -> 0x0000000050000000
> [ 0.374782] rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: idx4: 0x0000000060000000..0x0000000020000000 -> 0x0000000060000000
> ---
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-26 18:26 [PATCH V4 1/2] PCI: rcar: Move the inbound index check marek.vasut
2019-10-26 18:26 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] PCI: rcar: Recalculate inbound range alignment for each controller entry marek.vasut
2019-10-28 8:35 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-10-28 10:20 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2019-10-29 1:18 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-10-29 10:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-10-29 11:12 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-10-28 8:24 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] PCI: rcar: Move the inbound index check Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-10-29 11:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191028102048.GA4414@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=horms+renesas@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).