From: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>
To: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, rric@kernel.org,
helgaas@kernel.org, wsa@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] i2c: designware: Use the correct name of device-managed function
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:40:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210217114014.GB766103@nuc8i5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCwE2cf9X/Gd6lWy@rocinante>
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:46:01PM +0100, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
> Hi Dejin,
>
> Thank you for all the changes, looks good!
>
> You could improve the subject line, as it is very vague - what is the
> new function name more correct? Was the other and/or the previous one
> not correct? Seems like you are correcting a typo of sorts, rather than
> introducing a new function in this file.
>
If you have read the following commit comments, As you know, the
pci_alloc_irq_vectors() is not a real device-managed function. But
in some specific cases, it will act as an device-managed function.
Such naming will cause controversy, So In the case of need device-managed,
should be used pcim_alloc_irq_vectors(), an explicit device-managed
function. So the subject name is "Use the correct name of device-managed function".
> > Use the new function pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() to allocate IRQ vectors,
> > the pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() function, an explicit device-managed
> > version of pci_alloc_irq_vectors(). If pcim_enable_device() has been
> > called before, then pci_alloc_irq_vectors() is actually
> > a device-managed function. It is used here as a device-managed
> > function, So replace it with pcim_alloc_irq_vectors().
>
> The commit is good, but it could use some polish, so to speak.
>
> A few suggestions to think about:
>
> - What are we adding and/or changing, and why
> - Why is using pcim_alloc_irq_vectors(), which is part
> of the managed devices framework, a better alternative
> to the pci_alloc_irq_vectors()
> - And finally why this change allowed us to remove the
> pci_free_irq_vectors()
>
These are all explained by the device-managed function mechanism.
> > At the same time, simplify the error handling path.
>
> The change simplifies the error handling path, how? A line of two which
> explains how it has been achieved might help should someone reads the
> commit message in the future.
>
To put it simply, if the driver probe fail, the device-managed function
mechanism will automatically call pcim_release(), then the pci_free_irq_vectors()
will be executed. For details, please see the relevant code.
> [...]
> > if (controller->setup) {
> > r = controller->setup(pdev, controller);
> > - if (r) {
> > - pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> > + if (r)
> > return r;
> > - }
> > }
> >
> > i2c_dw_adjust_bus_speed(dev);
> > @@ -246,10 +244,8 @@ static int i2c_dw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > i2c_dw_acpi_configure(&pdev->dev);
> >
> > r = i2c_dw_validate_speed(dev);
> > - if (r) {
> > - pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> > + if (r)
> > return r;
> > - }
> >
> > i2c_dw_configure(dev);
> >
> > @@ -269,10 +265,8 @@ static int i2c_dw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > adap->nr = controller->bus_num;
> >
> > r = i2c_dw_probe(dev);
> > - if (r) {
> > - pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> > + if (r)
> > return r;
> > - }
> >
> > pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, 1000);
> > pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> > @@ -292,7 +286,6 @@ static void i2c_dw_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >
> > i2c_del_adapter(&dev->adapter);
> > devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, dev->irq, dev);
> > - pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
>
> If pcim_release() is called should the pci_driver's probe callback fail,
Yes, you guessed right.
> and I assume that this is precisely the case, then all of the above make
> sense in the view of using pcim_alloc_irq_vectors().
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>
>
> Krzysztof
BR,
Dejin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-17 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-16 16:02 [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() Dejin Zheng
2021-02-16 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI: " Dejin Zheng
2021-02-16 17:53 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-16 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Documentation: devres: Add pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() Dejin Zheng
2021-02-16 17:10 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-17 10:50 ` Dejin Zheng
2021-02-17 13:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-16 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] i2c: designware: Use the correct name of device-managed function Dejin Zheng
2021-02-16 17:46 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-17 11:40 ` Dejin Zheng [this message]
2021-02-17 13:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-18 14:15 ` Dejin Zheng
2021-02-16 16:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] i2c: thunderx: " Dejin Zheng
2021-02-16 17:49 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-18 9:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Introduce pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() Robert Richter
2021-02-18 14:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-19 11:19 ` Robert Richter
2021-02-19 13:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210217114014.GB766103@nuc8i5 \
--to=zhengdejin5@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).