From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: Make struct pci_epf_driver::remove return void
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 11:23:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210708092318.zksrx77fx53y45bt@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210705154650.roeaqika5ptknrnt@pengutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1601 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 05:46:50PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 03:29:27PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > On 23/02/21 2:37 pm, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > The driver core ignores the return value of pci_epf_device_remove()
> > > (because there is only little it can do when a device disappears) and
> > > there are no pci_epf_drivers with a remove callback.
> > >
> > > So make it impossible for future drivers to return an unused error code
> > > by changing the remove prototype to return void.
> > >
> > > The real motivation for this change is the quest to make struct
> > > bus_type::remove return void, too.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> >
> > Fine with this change!
> >
> > FWIW:
> > Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>
> Thanks for the ack. How can I expect this patch to go into mainline now?
> Will Bjorn pick it up now that you acked?
There is a series[1] that I'd like to get into mainline during the next
merge window and that depends on this patch. Ideally it would go in
for v5.14-rc1, otherwise I'd like to add it to the series changing
bus_type::remove that it goes in together. Would be sad if I had to
delay this cleanup for this dependency not going in.
Best regards
Uwe
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210706154803.1631813-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-08 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-23 9:07 [PATCH] PCI: endpoint: Make struct pci_epf_driver::remove return void Uwe Kleine-König
2021-05-05 19:53 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-05-10 19:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-22 8:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-22 9:59 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2021-06-22 10:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-05 15:46 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-07-08 9:23 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2021-07-08 10:15 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2021-07-12 20:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-07-13 6:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210708092318.zksrx77fx53y45bt@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).