linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rick Wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] pci: epf-test: Simplify transfers result print
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:21:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230215032155.74993-7-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215032155.74993-1-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>

In pci_epf_test_print_rate(), instead of open coding a reduction loop to
allow for a disivision by a 32-bits ns value, simply use div64_u64() to
calculate the rate. To match the printed unit of KB/s, this calculation
divides the rate by 1000 instead of 1024 (that would be KiB/s unit).

The format of the results printed by pci_epf_test_print_rate() is also
changed to be more compact without the double new line. dev_info() is
used instead of pr_info().

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
---
 drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 42 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
index e07868c99531..f630393e8208 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -297,34 +297,23 @@ static void pci_epf_test_clean_dma_chan(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test)
 	return;
 }
 
-static void pci_epf_test_print_rate(const char *ops, u64 size,
+static void pci_epf_test_print_rate(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
+				    const char *op, u64 size,
 				    struct timespec64 *start,
 				    struct timespec64 *end, bool dma)
 {
-	struct timespec64 ts;
-	u64 rate, ns;
-
-	ts = timespec64_sub(*end, *start);
-
-	/* convert both size (stored in 'rate') and time in terms of 'ns' */
-	ns = timespec64_to_ns(&ts);
-	rate = size * NSEC_PER_SEC;
-
-	/* Divide both size (stored in 'rate') and ns by a common factor */
-	while (ns > UINT_MAX) {
-		rate >>= 1;
-		ns >>= 1;
-	}
-
-	if (!ns)
-		return;
+	struct timespec64 ts = timespec64_sub(*end, *start);
+	u64 rate = 0, ns;
 
 	/* calculate the rate */
-	do_div(rate, (uint32_t)ns);
+	ns = timespec64_to_ns(&ts);
+	if (ns)
+		rate = div64_u64(size * NSEC_PER_SEC, ns * 1000);
 
-	pr_info("\n%s => Size: %llu bytes\t DMA: %s\t Time: %llu.%09u seconds\t"
-		"Rate: %llu KB/s\n", ops, size, dma ? "YES" : "NO",
-		(u64)ts.tv_sec, (u32)ts.tv_nsec, rate / 1024);
+	dev_info(&epf_test->epf->dev,
+		 "%s => Size: %llu B, DMA: %s, Time: %llu.%09u s, Rate: %llu KB/s\n",
+		 op, size, dma ? "YES" : "NO",
+		 (u64)ts.tv_sec, (u32)ts.tv_nsec, rate);
 }
 
 static int pci_epf_test_copy(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test, bool use_dma)
@@ -400,7 +389,8 @@ static int pci_epf_test_copy(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test, bool use_dma)
 		kfree(buf);
 	}
 	ktime_get_ts64(&end);
-	pci_epf_test_print_rate("COPY", reg->size, &start, &end, use_dma);
+	pci_epf_test_print_rate(epf_test, "COPY", reg->size, &start, &end,
+				use_dma);
 
 err_map_addr:
 	pci_epc_unmap_addr(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no, dst_phys_addr);
@@ -481,7 +471,8 @@ static int pci_epf_test_read(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test, bool use_dma)
 		ktime_get_ts64(&end);
 	}
 
-	pci_epf_test_print_rate("READ", reg->size, &start, &end, use_dma);
+	pci_epf_test_print_rate(epf_test, "READ", reg->size, &start, &end,
+				use_dma);
 
 	crc32 = crc32_le(~0, buf, reg->size);
 	if (crc32 != reg->checksum)
@@ -567,7 +558,8 @@ static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test, bool use_dma)
 		ktime_get_ts64(&end);
 	}
 
-	pci_epf_test_print_rate("WRITE", reg->size, &start, &end, use_dma);
+	pci_epf_test_print_rate(epf_test, "WRITE", reg->size, &start, &end,
+				use_dma);
 
 	/*
 	 * wait 1ms inorder for the write to complete. Without this delay L3
-- 
2.39.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-15  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-15  3:21 [PATCH 00/12] PCI endpoint fixes and improvements Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 01/12] pci: endpoint: Automatically create a function type attributes group Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16 10:04   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 12:31     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 02/12] pci: endpoint: do not export pci_epf_type_add_cfs() Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16 10:15   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 12:33     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 03/12] pci: epf-test: Fix DMA transfer completion detection Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16 10:18   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 04/12] pci: epf-test: Use driver registers as volatile Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16 10:23   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 05/12] pci: epf-test: Simplify dma support checks Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16 10:27   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-15  3:21 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2023-02-16 10:39   ` [PATCH 06/12] pci: epf-test: Simplify transfers result print Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 07/12] pci: epf-test: Add debug and error messages Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15 11:34   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-15 11:44     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15 11:34   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-15 11:45     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15 12:01       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-15 12:18         ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15 13:24           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-15 13:49             ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-02-15 22:55               ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 08/12] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Free IRQs before removing the device Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16 10:46   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 09/12] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Do not write status in IRQ handler Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16 10:51   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 10/12] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Re-init completion for every test Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16 10:55   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-16 12:35     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 11/12] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Simplify pci_endpoint_test_msi_irq() Damien Le Moal
2023-02-16 10:57   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-02-15  3:21 ` [PATCH 12/12] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add debug and error messages Damien Le Moal
2023-02-15 11:34   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230215032155.74993-7-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).