linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jason@lakedaemon.net" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] PCI: generic: Add support for ARM64 and MSI(x)
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:31:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3090148.OUdB0fsdsR@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140930120344.GA14215@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On Tuesday 30 September 2014 13:03:44 Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > >  static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -326,6 +385,7 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > >         struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > >         struct gen_pci *pci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_ARM64
> > >         struct hw_pci hw = {
> > >                 .nr_controllers = 1,
> > >                 .private_data   = (void **)&pci,
> > > @@ -333,6 +393,7 @@ static int gen_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >                 .map_irq        = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci,
> > >                 .ops            = &gen_pci_ops,
> > >         };
> > > +#endif
> > >  
> > 
> > Same here, I'd suggest marking this "#ifdef CONFIG_ARM" instead, as hw_pci
> > is an arm32 specific data structure.
> 
> I do not think we need hw struct at all, see below, we can write code so
> that we do not rely on ARM32 PCI bios, I will have a stab at that and
> post the resulting code.

That would of course be best. I think it needs some rework of the
arm32 PCI code though, or you'd still have to create pci_sys_data
manually, and that is currently allocated by pcibios_init_hw.

> > > +       if (!gen_scan_root_bus(&pdev->dev, pci->cfg.bus_range.start,
> > > +                              &gen_pci_ops, pci, &pci->resources)) {
> > > +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable PCIe ports\n");
> > > +               return -ENODEV;
> > > +       }
> > > +#else
> > >         pci_common_init_dev(dev, &hw);
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64 */
> > > 
> > 
> > Again, just make the pci_common_init_dev() call #ifdef CONFIG_ARM, and move
> > the generic case after it, outside of the #ifdef.
> 
> I went through the code quickly but I think we can (and should) remove
> this quite ugly ifdeffery altogether. Most of the functionality in
> pci_common_init_dev() can be implemented through the common PCI API (and this
> would make this driver arch agnostic as it should be), I will go through ARM32
> PCI bios code to check what is executed in detail in pci_common_init_dev() and
> make sure that we follow those initialization steps in the resulting probe code
> for this PCI generic host controller driver.

These are the functions I found that refer to pci_sys_data on arm32:

pcibios_add_bus
pcibios_remove_bus
pcibios_align_resource
pci_mmap_page_range
pci_domain_nr
pci_proc_domain

This is not as bad as I had feared, but we still have to ensure that
any caller of these functions will work with both the generic PCI support
and the arm32 specific drivers that today use hw_pci.

My idea for dealing with this was to convert all host drivers in
drivers/pci/host to the generic PCI code and never build the arm32
bios32 code when CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM is set. Unfortunately that
requires either doing them all at once or coming up with a migration
strategy so we don't break things in the process.

Note that arch/arm/mach-cns3xxx/pcie.c also belongs in the drivers/pci/host
category and should probably be moved there. The integrator and versatile
PCI drivers are currently not used with MULTIPLATFORM but will at some point
and we can convert them as we get there.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-30 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-28 20:53 [RFC 0/4] Add PCI/MSI(x) support for AMD Seattle Platform suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-09-28 20:53 ` [RFC 1/4] arm64: amd-seattle: Adding device tree for AMD Seattle platform suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-10-10 13:45   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-24 12:08     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-09-28 20:53 ` [RFC 2/4] PCI: generic: Add support for ARM64 and MSI(x) suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-09-29 14:36   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-30 12:03     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-30 12:31       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-09-30 16:12         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-30 16:42           ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-30 17:35             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-30 17:48               ` Liviu Dudau
2014-09-30 18:54                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-30 20:01                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01  8:46                     ` Liviu Dudau
2014-10-01  9:38                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-07 12:06                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-07 13:52                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-07 14:47                             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-07 21:39                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-08 10:19                                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-08 14:47                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-09  9:04                                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-09 10:51                                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 13:58                                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-10 18:31                                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-13  9:36                                             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-22 15:59                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-22 16:49                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-22 20:52                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-23  9:13                             ` Liviu Dudau
2014-10-23 11:27                               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-23 16:52                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-10-27 16:10                                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-23 13:33                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-24 10:04                                 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-11-05 23:40                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-11-06  0:06                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-29 19:32                                 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-01-02 11:55                                   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-01-02 18:18                                     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-01-02 21:09                                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-05 14:48                                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-05 23:39                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-11-06  0:05                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-06  9:52                                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-09-29 19:19   ` Sunil Kovvuri
2014-09-28 20:53 ` [RFC 3/4] arm64: Do not call enable PCI resources when specify PCI_PROBE_ONLY suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-09-29 14:38   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-29 18:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-06-23 22:34     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-06-23 23:05       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-23 22:32   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-28 20:53 ` [RFC 4/4] irqchip: gicv2m: Add supports for ARM GICv2m MSI(-X) suravee.suthikulpanit
2014-09-28 21:35   ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-09-29 14:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-09-29 14:42   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3090148.OUdB0fsdsR@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).