* [PATCH v1 1/4] ACPI: PCI: IRQ: Consolidate printing diagnostic messages
2021-02-19 18:14 [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: PCI: Unify printing of messages Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2021-02-19 18:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-19 18:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] ACPI: PCI: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-02-19 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux ACPI; +Cc: Linux PCI, LKML, Bjorn Helgaas, Hanjun Guo
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The code in pci_irq.c prints diagnostic messages using different
and inconsistent methods. The majority of them are printed with
the help of the dev_*() familiy of logging functions, but
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT_RAW() are still used in
some places which requires the ACPICA debug to be enabled
additionally which is a nuisance and one message is printed
using the raw printk().
To consolidate the printing of messages in that code, convert all of
the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() instances in it into dev_dbg(), which is
consistent with the way the other messages are printed by it,
replace the only ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT_RAW() instance with pr_debug() and
make it use pr_warn() istead of printk(KERN_WARNING ).
Also add a pr_fmt() definition to that file and drop the
_COMPONENT and ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definitions that are not used
any more after the above changes.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c | 34 ++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
* Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
*/
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: PCI: " fmt
#include <linux/dmi.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
@@ -22,11 +23,6 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#define PREFIX "ACPI: "
-
-#define _COMPONENT ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT
-ACPI_MODULE_NAME("pci_irq");
-
struct acpi_prt_entry {
struct acpi_pci_id id;
u8 pin;
@@ -126,7 +122,7 @@ static void do_prt_fixups(struct acpi_pr
entry->pin == quirk->pin &&
!strcmp(prt->source, quirk->source) &&
strlen(prt->source) >= strlen(quirk->actual_source)) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "firmware reports "
+ pr_warn("Firmware reports "
"%04x:%02x:%02x PCI INT %c connected to %s; "
"changing to %s\n",
entry->id.segment, entry->id.bus,
@@ -191,12 +187,9 @@ static int acpi_pci_irq_check_entry(acpi
* the IRQ value, which is hardwired to specific interrupt inputs on
* the interrupt controller.
*/
-
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT_RAW((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- " %04x:%02x:%02x[%c] -> %s[%d]\n",
- entry->id.segment, entry->id.bus,
- entry->id.device, pin_name(entry->pin),
- prt->source, entry->index));
+ pr_debug("%04x:%02x:%02x[%c] -> %s[%d]\n",
+ entry->id.segment, entry->id.bus, entry->id.device,
+ pin_name(entry->pin), prt->source, entry->index);
*entry_ptr = entry;
@@ -307,8 +300,7 @@ static struct acpi_prt_entry *acpi_pci_i
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
acpi_reroute_boot_interrupt(dev, entry);
#endif /* CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC */
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Found %s[%c] _PRT entry\n",
- pci_name(dev), pin_name(pin)));
+ dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "Found [%c] _PRT entry\n", pin_name(pin));
return entry;
}
@@ -324,9 +316,7 @@ static struct acpi_prt_entry *acpi_pci_i
/* PC card has the same IRQ as its cardbridge */
bridge_pin = bridge->pin;
if (!bridge_pin) {
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "No interrupt pin configured for device %s\n",
- pci_name(bridge)));
+ dev_dbg(&bridge->dev, "No interrupt pin configured\n");
return NULL;
}
pin = bridge_pin;
@@ -334,10 +324,8 @@ static struct acpi_prt_entry *acpi_pci_i
ret = acpi_pci_irq_find_prt_entry(bridge, pin, &entry);
if (!ret && entry) {
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "Derived GSI for %s INT %c from %s\n",
- pci_name(dev), pin_name(orig_pin),
- pci_name(bridge)));
+ dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "Derived GSI INT %c from %s\n",
+ pin_name(orig_pin), pci_name(bridge));
return entry;
}
@@ -413,9 +401,7 @@ int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *
pin = dev->pin;
if (!pin) {
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "No interrupt pin configured for device %s\n",
- pci_name(dev)));
+ dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "No interrupt pin configured\n");
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH v1 2/4] ACPI: PCI: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION()
2021-02-19 18:14 [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: PCI: Unify printing of messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] ACPI: PCI: IRQ: Consolidate printing diagnostic messages Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2021-02-19 18:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-19 18:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] ACPI: PCI: Drop ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT that is not used any more Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-02-19 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux ACPI; +Cc: Linux PCI, LKML, Bjorn Helgaas, Hanjun Guo
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for
message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used
elsewhere. Special configuration (either kernel command line or
sysfs-based) is needed to see the messages printed by them and
the format of those messages is also special and convoluted.
For this reason, replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and
ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in pci_link.c with acpi_handle_*() calls
relative to the ACPI handle of the given link device (wherever that
handle is readily available) or pr_debug() invocations.
While at it, make acpi_pci_link_check_current() print all messages
with pr_debug(), because all of them are in the same category (_CRS
return buffer issues) and they all should be printed at the same log
level.
Also make acpi_pci_link_set() use acpi_handle_*() for printing all
messages for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
#include "internal.h"
-#define _COMPONENT ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT
-ACPI_MODULE_NAME("pci_link");
#define ACPI_PCI_LINK_CLASS "pci_irq_routing"
#define ACPI_PCI_LINK_DEVICE_NAME "PCI Interrupt Link"
#define ACPI_PCI_LINK_MAX_POSSIBLE 16
@@ -85,6 +83,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_p
void *context)
{
struct acpi_pci_link *link = context;
+ acpi_handle handle = link->device->handle;
u32 i;
switch (resource->type) {
@@ -95,8 +94,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_p
{
struct acpi_resource_irq *p = &resource->data.irq;
if (!p || !p->interrupt_count) {
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "Blank _PRS IRQ resource\n"));
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle,
+ "Blank _PRS IRQ resource\n");
return AE_OK;
}
for (i = 0;
@@ -153,18 +152,18 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_p
static int acpi_pci_link_get_possible(struct acpi_pci_link *link)
{
+ acpi_handle handle = link->device->handle;
acpi_status status;
- status = acpi_walk_resources(link->device->handle, METHOD_NAME__PRS,
+ status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__PRS,
acpi_pci_link_check_possible, link);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- acpi_handle_debug(link->device->handle, "_PRS not present or invalid");
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_PRS not present or invalid");
return 0;
}
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "Found %d possible IRQs\n",
- link->irq.possible_count));
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Found %d possible IRQs\n",
+ link->irq.possible_count);
return 0;
}
@@ -186,8 +185,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_c
* IRQ descriptors may have no IRQ# bits set,
* particularly those those w/ _STA disabled
*/
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "Blank _CRS IRQ resource\n"));
+ pr_debug("Blank _CRS IRQ resource\n");
return AE_OK;
}
*irq = p->interrupts[0];
@@ -202,8 +200,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_c
* extended IRQ descriptors must
* return at least 1 IRQ
*/
- printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
- "Blank _CRS EXT IRQ resource\n");
+ pr_debug("Blank _CRS EXT IRQ resource\n");
return AE_OK;
}
*irq = p->interrupts[0];
@@ -211,8 +208,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_c
}
break;
default:
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "_CRS resource type 0x%x isn't an IRQ\n",
- resource->type);
+ pr_debug("_CRS resource type 0x%x is not IRQ\n",
+ resource->type);
return AE_OK;
}
@@ -228,8 +225,9 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_c
*/
static int acpi_pci_link_get_current(struct acpi_pci_link *link)
{
- int result = 0;
+ acpi_handle handle = link->device->handle;
acpi_status status;
+ int result = 0;
int irq = 0;
link->irq.active = 0;
@@ -239,12 +237,12 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_get_current(str
/* Query _STA, set link->device->status */
result = acpi_bus_get_status(link->device);
if (result) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Unable to read status\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "Unable to read status\n");
goto end;
}
if (!link->device->status.enabled) {
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Link disabled\n"));
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Link disabled\n");
return 0;
}
}
@@ -253,22 +251,23 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_get_current(str
* Query and parse _CRS to get the current IRQ assignment.
*/
- status = acpi_walk_resources(link->device->handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
+ status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
acpi_pci_link_check_current, &irq);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _CRS"));
+ acpi_handle_warn(handle, "_CRS evaluation failed: %s\n",
+ acpi_format_exception(status));
result = -ENODEV;
goto end;
}
if (acpi_strict && !irq) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "_CRS returned 0\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "_CRS returned 0\n");
result = -ENODEV;
}
link->irq.active = irq;
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Link at IRQ %d \n", link->irq.active));
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Link at IRQ %d \n", link->irq.active);
end:
return result;
@@ -276,13 +275,14 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_get_current(str
static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link *link, int irq)
{
- int result;
- acpi_status status;
struct {
struct acpi_resource res;
struct acpi_resource end;
} *resource;
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { 0, NULL };
+ acpi_handle handle = link->device->handle;
+ acpi_status status;
+ int result;
if (!irq)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -329,7 +329,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi
/* ignore resource_source, it's optional */
break;
default:
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Invalid Resource_type %d\n", link->irq.resource_type);
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "Invalid resource type %d\n",
+ link->irq.resource_type);
result = -EINVAL;
goto end;
@@ -342,7 +343,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi
/* check for total failure */
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _SRS"));
+ acpi_handle_warn(handle, "_SRS evaluation failed: %s",
+ acpi_format_exception(status));
result = -ENODEV;
goto end;
}
@@ -350,15 +352,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi
/* Query _STA, set device->status */
result = acpi_bus_get_status(link->device);
if (result) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Unable to read status\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "Unable to read status\n");
goto end;
}
- if (!link->device->status.enabled) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
- "%s [%s] disabled and referenced, BIOS bug\n",
- acpi_device_name(link->device),
- acpi_device_bid(link->device));
- }
+ if (!link->device->status.enabled)
+ acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Disabled and referenced, BIOS bug\n");
/* Query _CRS, set link->irq.active */
result = acpi_pci_link_get_current(link);
@@ -375,14 +373,12 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi
* policy: when _CRS doesn't return what we just _SRS
* assume _SRS worked and override _CRS value.
*/
- printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
- "%s [%s] BIOS reported IRQ %d, using IRQ %d\n",
- acpi_device_name(link->device),
- acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active, irq);
+ acpi_handle_warn(handle, "BIOS reported IRQ %d, using IRQ %d\n",
+ link->irq.active, irq);
link->irq.active = irq;
}
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Set IRQ %d\n", link->irq.active));
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Set IRQ %d\n", link->irq.active);
end:
kfree(resource);
@@ -656,9 +652,7 @@ int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_hand
*polarity = link->irq.polarity;
if (name)
*name = acpi_device_bid(link->device);
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "Link %s is referenced\n",
- acpi_device_bid(link->device)));
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Link is referenced\n");
return link->irq.active;
}
@@ -702,9 +696,7 @@ int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle h
*/
link->refcnt--;
#endif
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "Link %s is dereferenced\n",
- acpi_device_bid(link->device)));
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Link is dereferenced\n");
if (link->refcnt == 0)
acpi_evaluate_object(link->device->handle, "_DIS", NULL, NULL);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH v1 3/4] ACPI: PCI: Drop ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT that is not used any more
2021-02-19 18:14 [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: PCI: Unify printing of messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] ACPI: PCI: IRQ: Consolidate printing diagnostic messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-19 18:16 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] ACPI: PCI: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2021-02-19 18:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-19 18:17 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] ACPI: PCI: Replace direct printk() invocations in pci_link.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-20 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: PCI: Unify printing of messages Hanjun Guo
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-02-19 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux ACPI; +Cc: Linux PCI, LKML, Bjorn Helgaas, Hanjun Guo
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
After dropping all of the code using ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT drop the
definition of it too and update the documentation to remove all
ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT references from it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 4 +---
Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst | 5 -----
drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 1 -
include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ linux-pm/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG must be enabled to produce any ACPI
debug output. Bits in debug_layer correspond to a
_COMPONENT in an ACPI source file, e.g.,
- #define _COMPONENT ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT
+ #define _COMPONENT ACPI_EVENTS
Bits in debug_level correspond to a level in
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT statements, e.g.,
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, ...
@@ -60,8 +60,6 @@
Enable processor driver info messages:
acpi.debug_layer=0x20000000
- Enable PCI/PCI interrupt routing info messages:
- acpi.debug_layer=0x400000
Enable AML "Debug" output, i.e., stores to the Debug
object while interpreting AML:
acpi.debug_layer=0xffffffff acpi.debug_level=0x2
Index: linux-pm/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
+++ linux-pm/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/debug.rst
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ shows the supported mask values, current
ACPI_TOOLS 0x00002000
ACPI_SBS_COMPONENT 0x00100000
ACPI_FAN_COMPONENT 0x00200000
- ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT 0x00400000
ACPI_CONTAINER_COMPONENT 0x01000000
ACPI_SYSTEM_COMPONENT 0x02000000
ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_COMPONENT 0x08000000
@@ -127,10 +126,6 @@ AML) during boot::
acpi.debug_layer=0xffffffff acpi.debug_level=0x2
-Enable PCI and PCI interrupt routing debug messages::
-
- acpi.debug_layer=0x400000 acpi.debug_level=0x4
-
Enable all ACPI hardware-related messages::
acpi.debug_layer=0x2 acpi.debug_level=0xffffffff
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static const struct acpi_dlayer acpi_deb
ACPI_DEBUG_INIT(ACPI_SBS_COMPONENT),
ACPI_DEBUG_INIT(ACPI_FAN_COMPONENT),
- ACPI_DEBUG_INIT(ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT),
ACPI_DEBUG_INIT(ACPI_CONTAINER_COMPONENT),
ACPI_DEBUG_INIT(ACPI_SYSTEM_COMPONENT),
ACPI_DEBUG_INIT(ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_COMPONENT),
Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
+++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
*/
#define ACPI_SBS_COMPONENT 0x00100000
#define ACPI_FAN_COMPONENT 0x00200000
-#define ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT 0x00400000
#define ACPI_CONTAINER_COMPONENT 0x01000000
#define ACPI_SYSTEM_COMPONENT 0x02000000
#define ACPI_MEMORY_DEVICE_COMPONENT 0x08000000
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH v1 4/4] ACPI: PCI: Replace direct printk() invocations in pci_link.c
2021-02-19 18:14 [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: PCI: Unify printing of messages Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-19 18:16 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] ACPI: PCI: Drop ACPI_PCI_COMPONENT that is not used any more Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2021-02-19 18:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-20 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: PCI: Unify printing of messages Hanjun Guo
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-02-19 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux ACPI; +Cc: Linux PCI, LKML, Bjorn Helgaas, Hanjun Guo
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Replace the direct printk() invocations in pci_link.c with (mostly
corresponding) acpi_handle_*() calls relative to the ACPI handle of
the given link device, which allows the AML corresponding to those
messages to be identified more easily, or with pr_*() calls.
While at it, add a pr_fmt() definition ot pci_link.c, make
acpi_pci_link_check_possible() print all messages with
acpi_handle_debug() for consistency and replace the (not-so-
reliable) KERN_CONT-based message line composition in
acpi_pci_link_add() with two pr_info() and a series of
acpi_handle_debug() calls (the latter for the possible IRQs).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
* for IRQ management (e.g. start()->_SRS).
*/
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: PCI: " fmt
+
#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -102,9 +104,9 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_p
(i < p->interrupt_count
&& i < ACPI_PCI_LINK_MAX_POSSIBLE); i++) {
if (!p->interrupts[i]) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
- "Invalid _PRS IRQ %d\n",
- p->interrupts[i]);
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle,
+ "Invalid _PRS IRQ %d\n",
+ p->interrupts[i]);
continue;
}
link->irq.possible[i] = p->interrupts[i];
@@ -120,17 +122,17 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_p
struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *p =
&resource->data.extended_irq;
if (!p || !p->interrupt_count) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
- "Blank _PRS EXT IRQ resource\n");
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle,
+ "Blank _PRS EXT IRQ resource\n");
return AE_OK;
}
for (i = 0;
(i < p->interrupt_count
&& i < ACPI_PCI_LINK_MAX_POSSIBLE); i++) {
if (!p->interrupts[i]) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
- "Invalid _PRS IRQ %d\n",
- p->interrupts[i]);
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle,
+ "Invalid _PRS IRQ %d\n",
+ p->interrupts[i]);
continue;
}
link->irq.possible[i] = p->interrupts[i];
@@ -142,8 +144,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_link_check_p
break;
}
default:
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "_PRS resource type 0x%x isn't an IRQ\n",
- resource->type);
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "_PRS resource type 0x%x is not IRQ\n",
+ resource->type);
return AE_OK;
}
@@ -527,6 +529,7 @@ static int acpi_irq_balance = -1; /* 0:
static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct acpi_pci_link *link)
{
+ acpi_handle handle = link->device->handle;
int irq;
int i;
@@ -549,8 +552,8 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct
*/
if (i == link->irq.possible_count) {
if (acpi_strict)
- printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "_CRS %d not found"
- " in _PRS\n", link->irq.active);
+ acpi_handle_warn(handle, "_CRS %d not found in _PRS\n",
+ link->irq.active);
link->irq.active = 0;
}
@@ -574,28 +577,23 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct
}
}
if (acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) >= PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "No IRQ available for %s [%s]. "
- "Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off\n",
- acpi_device_name(link->device),
- acpi_device_bid(link->device));
+ acpi_handle_err(handle,
+ "No IRQ available. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
/* Attempt to enable the link device at this IRQ. */
if (acpi_pci_link_set(link, irq)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Unable to set IRQ for %s [%s]. "
- "Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off\n",
- acpi_device_name(link->device),
- acpi_device_bid(link->device));
+ acpi_handle_err(handle,
+ "Unable to set IRQ. Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off\n");
return -ENODEV;
} else {
if (link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
- pr_info("%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n",
- acpi_device_name(link->device),
- acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active);
+ acpi_handle_info(handle, "Enabled at IRQ %d\n",
+ link->irq.active);
}
link->irq.initialized = 1;
@@ -616,19 +614,19 @@ int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_hand
result = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device);
if (result) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Invalid link device\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "Invalid link device\n");
return -1;
}
link = acpi_driver_data(device);
if (!link) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Invalid link context\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "Invalid link context\n");
return -1;
}
/* TBD: Support multiple index (IRQ) entries per Link Device */
if (index) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Invalid index %d\n", index);
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "Invalid index %d\n", index);
return -1;
}
@@ -640,7 +638,7 @@ int acpi_pci_link_allocate_irq(acpi_hand
if (!link->irq.active) {
mutex_unlock(&acpi_link_lock);
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Link active IRQ is 0!\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "Link active IRQ is 0!\n");
return -1;
}
link->refcnt++;
@@ -668,20 +666,20 @@ int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle h
result = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device);
if (result) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Invalid link device\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "Invalid link device\n");
return -1;
}
link = acpi_driver_data(device);
if (!link) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Invalid link context\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "Invalid link context\n");
return -1;
}
mutex_lock(&acpi_link_lock);
if (!link->irq.initialized) {
mutex_unlock(&acpi_link_lock);
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Link isn't initialized\n");
+ acpi_handle_err(handle, "Link isn't initialized\n");
return -1;
}
#ifdef FUTURE_USE
@@ -712,10 +710,10 @@ int acpi_pci_link_free_irq(acpi_handle h
static int acpi_pci_link_add(struct acpi_device *device,
const struct acpi_device_id *not_used)
{
- int result;
+ acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
struct acpi_pci_link *link;
+ int result;
int i;
- int found = 0;
link = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_link), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!link)
@@ -734,31 +732,23 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_add(struct acpi
/* query and set link->irq.active */
acpi_pci_link_get_current(link);
- printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (IRQs", acpi_device_name(device),
- acpi_device_bid(device));
+ pr_info("Interrupt link %s configured for IRQ %d\n",
+ acpi_device_bid(device), link->irq.active);
+
for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++) {
- if (link->irq.active == link->irq.possible[i]) {
- printk(KERN_CONT " *%d", link->irq.possible[i]);
- found = 1;
- } else
- printk(KERN_CONT " %d", link->irq.possible[i]);
+ if (link->irq.active != link->irq.possible[i])
+ acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Possible IRQ %d\n",
+ link->irq.possible[i]);
}
- printk(KERN_CONT ")");
-
- if (!found)
- printk(KERN_CONT " *%d", link->irq.active);
-
if (!link->device->status.enabled)
- printk(KERN_CONT ", disabled.");
-
- printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
+ pr_info("Interrupt link %s disabled\n", acpi_device_bid(device));
list_add_tail(&link->list, &acpi_link_list);
end:
/* disable all links -- to be activated on use */
- acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle, "_DIS", NULL, NULL);
+ acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DIS", NULL, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&acpi_link_lock);
if (result)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: PCI: Unify printing of messages
2021-02-19 18:14 [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: PCI: Unify printing of messages Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-19 18:17 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] ACPI: PCI: Replace direct printk() invocations in pci_link.c Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2021-02-20 9:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2021-03-03 18:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
4 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hanjun Guo @ 2021-02-20 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux ACPI; +Cc: Linux PCI, LKML, Bjorn Helgaas
On 2021/2/20 2:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This series gets rid of ACPICA debugging from non-ACPICA code related to PCI
> (patches [1-3/4]) and replaces direct printk() usage in pci_link.c with
> pr_*() or acpi_handle_*().
>
> Please refer to the patch changelogs for details.
Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Thanks
Hanjun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: PCI: Unify printing of messages
2021-02-20 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: PCI: Unify printing of messages Hanjun Guo
@ 2021-03-03 18:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-03-03 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hanjun Guo, Linux ACPI; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux PCI, LKML, Bjorn Helgaas
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:25 AM Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2021/2/20 2:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This series gets rid of ACPICA debugging from non-ACPICA code related to PCI
> > (patches [1-3/4]) and replaces direct printk() usage in pci_link.c with
> > pr_*() or acpi_handle_*().
> >
> > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details.
>
> Looks good to me,
>
> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Thanks!
Given the absence of any further comments I will be queuing up this
series for 5.13, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread