From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] PCI: rcar: Add L1 link state fix into data abort hook
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 14:05:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57358982-ef8c-ed91-c011-00b8a48c4ebd@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119173553.GB23852@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 11/19/20 6:35 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +/*
>> + * Here we keep a static copy of the remapped PCIe controller address.
>> + * This is only used on aarch32 systems, all of which have one single
>> + * PCIe controller, to provide quick access to the PCIe controller in
>> + * the L1 link state fixup function, called from the ARM fault handler.
>> + */
>> +static void __iomem *pcie_base;
>> +/*
>> + * Static copy of bus clock pointer, so we can check whether the clock
>> + * is enabled or not.
>> + */
>> +static struct clk *pcie_bus_clk;
>> +#endif
>
> Don't think you can have multiple host bridges in a given platform,
> if it is a possible configuration this won't work.
Correct, all the affected platforms have only one host bridge.
>> static inline struct rcar_msi *to_rcar_msi(struct msi_controller *chip)
>> {
>> return container_of(chip, struct rcar_msi, chip);
>> @@ -804,6 +820,12 @@ static int rcar_pcie_get_resources(struct rcar_pcie_host *host)
>> }
>> host->msi.irq2 = i;
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> + /* Cache static copy for L1 link state fixup hook on aarch32 */
>> + pcie_base = pcie->base;
>> + pcie_bus_clk = host->bus_clk;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> return 0;
>>
>> err_irq2:
>> @@ -1050,4 +1072,58 @@ static struct platform_driver rcar_pcie_driver = {
>> },
>> .probe = rcar_pcie_probe,
>> };
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> +static int rcar_pcie_aarch32_abort_handler(unsigned long addr,
>> + unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + u32 pmsr;
>> +
>> + if (!pcie_base || !__clk_is_enabled(pcie_bus_clk))
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + pmsr = readl(pcie_base + PMSR);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Test if the PCIe controller received PM_ENTER_L1 DLLP and
>> + * the PCIe controller is not in L1 link state. If true, apply
>> + * fix, which will put the controller into L1 link state, from
>> + * which it can return to L0s/L0 on its own.
>> + */
>> + if ((pmsr & PMEL1RX) && ((pmsr & PMSTATE) != PMSTATE_L1)) {
>> + writel(L1IATN, pcie_base + PMCTLR);
>> + while (!(readl(pcie_base + PMSR) & L1FAEG))
>> + ;
>> + writel(L1FAEG | PMEL1RX, pcie_base + PMSR);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>
> I suppose a fault on multiple cores can happen simultaneously, if it
> does this may not work well either - I assume all config/io/mem would
> trigger a fault.
>
> As I mentioned in my reply to v1, is there a chance we can move
> this quirk into config accessors (if the PM_ENTER_L1_DLLP is
> subsequent to a write into PMCSR to programme a D state) ?
I don't think we can, since the userspace can do such a config space
write with e.g. setpci and then this fixup is still needed.
> Config access is serialized but I suspect as I said above that this
> triggers on config/io/mem alike.
>
> Just asking to try to avoid a fault handler if possible.
See above, I doubt we can fully avoid this workaround.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-29 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-16 12:04 [PATCH V4] PCI: rcar: Add L1 link state fix into data abort hook marek.vasut
2020-10-17 14:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-11-19 17:35 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-11-29 13:05 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2020-12-08 10:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-12-08 17:45 ` Marek Vasut
2020-12-08 17:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-12-08 16:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-08 18:05 ` Marek Vasut
2020-12-08 18:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-10 12:12 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-12-12 19:12 ` Marek Vasut
2020-12-14 17:13 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-12-16 17:52 ` Marek Vasut
2020-12-12 19:10 ` Marek Vasut
2020-12-14 20:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-12-16 17:56 ` Marek Vasut
2020-12-16 18:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57358982-ef8c-ed91-c011-00b8a48c4ebd@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).