linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
Cc: "Frank Wunderlich" <linux@fw-web.de>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@ti.com>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Johan Jonker" <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
	"Peter Geis" <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
	"Michael Riesch" <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [RFC/RFT 2/6] dt-bindings: soc: grf: add pcie30-{phy,pipe}-grf
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 21:40:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b9ad0a6-acc0-aad9-c49d-e4a4b38374bb@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-c60358c4-ebd1-47bf-91e0-9ae0beefd39f-1650389348418@3c-app-gmx-bap70>

On 19/04/2022 19:29, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> Gesendet: Montag, 18. April 2022 um 17:54 Uhr
>> Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
>>> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ properties:
>>>      oneOf:
>>>        - items:
>>>            - enum:
>>> +              - rockchip,pcie30-phy-grf
>>> +              - rockchip,pcie30-pipe-grf
>>
>> These are without SoC parts. Are these PCIe v3 General Register Files
>> part of some PCIe spec?
> 
> imho they are shared across SoCs rk3568 and rk3588, but have only seen rk3568 implementation yet.
> PCIe driver currently supports these 2 Soc (different offsets in the Phy-GRF), but can only test rk3568.
> 
> pipe-grf seems only be used for rk35688 (offset used in probe is defined for this SoC), which i cannot test.
> 
> so i have left them SoC independed.

Compatibles should be SoC dependent, with some exceptions. Lack of
documentation or lack of possibility of testing is actually argument
against any exception, so they should be SoC specific/dependent.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-19 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-16 13:54 [RFC/RFT 0/6] RK3568 PCIe V3 support Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-16 13:54 ` [RFC/RFT 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip: add pcie3 phy Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-18 15:52   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-19 17:49     ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-19 19:43       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-19 20:36         ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-19 20:48           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-16 13:54 ` [RFC/RFT 2/6] dt-bindings: soc: grf: add pcie30-{phy,pipe}-grf Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-18 15:54   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-19 17:29     ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-19 19:40       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2022-04-20 13:04         ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-16 13:54 ` [RFC/RFT 3/6] phy: rockchip: Support pcie v3 Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-18 10:38   ` Vinod Koul
2022-04-18 15:57   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-20  7:29   ` Philipp Zabel
2022-04-16 13:54 ` [RFC/RFT 4/6] PCI: rockchip-dwc: add pcie bifurcation Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-16 23:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-17  9:08     ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-18 15:53       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-18 16:17         ` Peter Geis
2022-04-21 15:41           ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-16 13:54 ` [RFC/RFT 5/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3568: Add PCIe v3 nodes Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-16 13:54 ` [RFC/RFT 6/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add PCIe v3 nodes to BPI-R2-Pro Frank Wunderlich
2022-04-18 15:57   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-11 19:26 ` [RFC/RFT 0/6] RK3568 PCIe V3 support Piotr Oniszczuk
2022-05-11 20:10   ` Frank Wunderlich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8b9ad0a6-acc0-aad9-c49d-e4a4b38374bb@linaro.org \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@fw-web.de \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).