From: "Sean V Kelley" <sean.v.kelley@intel.com> To: "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org> Cc: "Sean V Kelley" <seanvk.dev@oregontracks.org>, bhelgaas@google.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com, qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/14] PCI/RCEC: Add RCiEP's linked RCEC to AER/ERR Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:34:01 -0700 Message-ID: <C3CF4A15-B00B-4347-89C7-B331E17ECF69@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <41B2B0A9-80B0-41DA-9FF3-A5D9465E6E08@intel.com> On 9 Oct 2020, at 11:26, Sean V Kelley wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > On 9 Oct 2020, at 10:57, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 11:47:32AM -0700, Sean V Kelley wrote: >>> From: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com> >>> >>> When attempting error recovery for an RCiEP associated with an RCEC >>> device, >>> there needs to be a way to update the Root Error Status, the >>> Uncorrectable >>> Error Status and the Uncorrectable Error Severity of the parent >>> RCEC. >>> In some non-native cases in which there is no OS visible device >>> associated with the RCiEP, there is nothing to act upon as the >>> firmware >>> is acting before the OS. So add handling for the linked 'rcec' in >>> AER/ERR >>> while taking into account non-native cases. >>> >>> Co-developed-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 9 +++++---- >>> drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >>> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c >>> index 65dff5f3457a..dccdba60b5d9 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c >>> @@ -1358,17 +1358,18 @@ static int aer_probe(struct pcie_device >>> *dev) >>> static pci_ers_result_t aer_root_reset(struct pci_dev *dev) >>> { >>> int aer = dev->aer_cap; >>> + int rc = 0; >>> u32 reg32; >>> - int rc; >>> - >>> >>> /* Disable Root's interrupt in response to error messages */ >>> pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, ®32); >>> reg32 &= ~ROOT_PORT_INTR_ON_MESG_MASK; >>> pci_write_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_COMMAND, reg32); >>> >>> - rc = pci_bus_error_reset(dev); >>> - pci_info(dev, "Root Port link has been reset\n"); >>> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) { >>> + rc = pci_bus_error_reset(dev); >>> + pci_info(dev, "Root Port link has been reset\n"); >>> + } >>> >>> /* Clear Root Error Status */ >>> pci_read_config_dword(dev, aer + PCI_ERR_ROOT_STATUS, ®32); >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c >>> index 38abd7984996..956ad4c86d53 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c >>> @@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static int report_resume(struct pci_dev *dev, >>> void *data) >>> /** >>> * pci_walk_bridge - walk bridges potentially AER affected >>> * @bridge bridge which may be an RCEC with associated RCiEPs, >>> - * an RCiEP associated with an RCEC, or a Port. >>> + * or a Port. >>> + * @dev an RCiEP lacking an associated RCEC. >>> * @cb callback to be called for each device found >>> * @userdata arbitrary pointer to be passed to callback. >>> * >>> @@ -160,13 +161,20 @@ static int report_resume(struct pci_dev *dev, >>> void *data) >>> * If the device provided has no subordinate bus, call the provided >>> * callback on the device itself. >>> */ >>> -static void pci_walk_bridge(struct pci_dev *bridge, int >>> (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *), >>> +static void pci_walk_bridge(struct pci_dev *bridge, struct pci_dev >>> *dev, >>> + int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *), >>> void *userdata) >>> { >>> - if (bridge->subordinate) >>> + /* >>> + * In a non-native case where there is no OS-visible reporting >>> + * device the bridge will be NULL, i.e., no RCEC, no PORT. >>> + */ >>> + if (bridge && bridge->subordinate) >>> pci_walk_bus(bridge->subordinate, cb, userdata); >>> - else >>> + else if (bridge) >>> cb(bridge, userdata); >>> + else >>> + cb(dev, userdata); >>> } >>> >>> static pci_ers_result_t flr_on_rciep(struct pci_dev *dev) >>> @@ -196,16 +204,25 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct >>> pci_dev *dev, >>> type = pci_pcie_type(dev); >>> if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT || >>> type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM || >>> - type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC || >>> - type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) >>> + type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) >>> bridge = dev; >>> + else if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) >>> + bridge = dev->rcec; >>> else >>> bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(dev); >>> >>> pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast error_detected message\n"); >>> if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) { >>> - pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_frozen_detected, &status); >>> + pci_walk_bridge(bridge, dev, report_frozen_detected, &status); >>> if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) { >>> + /* >>> + * The callback only clears the Root Error Status >>> + * of the RCEC (see aer.c). Only perform this for the >>> + * native case, i.e., an RCEC is present. >>> + */ >>> + if (bridge) >>> + reset_subordinate_devices(bridge); >> >> Help me understand this. There are lots of callbacks in this >> picture, >> but I guess this "callback only clears Root Error Status" must refer >> to aer_root_reset(), i.e., the reset_subordinate_devices pointer? > > The ‘bridge’ in this case will always be dev->rcec, the event > collector for the associated RC_END. And that’s what’s being > cleared in aer.c via aer_root_reset() as the callback. It’s also > being checked for native/non-native here. > >> >> Of course, the caller of pcie_do_recovery() supplied that pointer. >> And we can infer that it must be aer_root_reset(), not >> dpc_reset_link(), because RCECs and RCiEPs are not allowed to >> implement DPC. > > Correct. > >> >> I wish we didn't have either this assumption about what >> reset_subordinate_devices points to, or the assumption about what >> aer_root_reset() does. They both seem a little bit tenuous. > > Agree. It’s the relationship between the RC_END and the RC_EC. > >> >> We already made aer_root_reset() smart enough to check for RCECs. >> Can >> we put the FLR there, too? Then we wouldn't have this weird >> situation >> where reset_subordinate_devices() does a reset and clears error >> status, EXCEPT for this case where it only clears error status and we >> do the reset here? > > We could add the smarts to aer_root_reset() to check for an RC_END in > that callback and perform the clear there on its RC_EC. We just > wouldn’t map ‘bridge’ to dev->rcec for RC_END in > pcie_do_recovery() which would simplify things. > > Further, the FLR in the case of flr_on_rciep() below is specific to > the RCiEP itself. So it could be performed either in aer_root_reset() > or remain in the pcie_do_recovery(). > > That should work. > > Sean Thinking more on this, you could still pass dev->rcec to the callback (eventually aer_root_reset()), but you won’t have the ability to handle the FLR there without the pointer to the RC_END. That’s why I suggested passing the RC_END and checking for its RC_EC in aer_root_reset() if you want to also handle FLR there too from below. Sean > > >> >>> status = flr_on_rciep(dev); >>> if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) { >>> pci_warn(dev, "function level reset failed\n"); >>> @@ -219,13 +236,13 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct >>> pci_dev *dev, >>> } >>> } >>> } else { >>> - pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_normal_detected, &status); >>> + pci_walk_bridge(bridge, dev, report_normal_detected, &status); >>> } >>> >>> if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER) { >>> status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED; >>> pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast mmio_enabled message\n"); >>> - pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_mmio_enabled, &status); >>> + pci_walk_bridge(bridge, dev, report_mmio_enabled, &status); >>> } >>> >>> if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET) { >>> @@ -236,14 +253,14 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct >>> pci_dev *dev, >>> */ >>> status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED; >>> pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast slot_reset message\n"); >>> - pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_slot_reset, &status); >>> + pci_walk_bridge(bridge, dev, report_slot_reset, &status); >>> } >>> >>> if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) >>> goto failed; >>> >>> pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast resume message\n"); >>> - pci_walk_bridge(bridge, report_resume, &status); >>> + pci_walk_bridge(bridge, dev, report_resume, &status); >>> >>> if (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT || >>> type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM || >>> -- >>> 2.28.0 >>>
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-10-02 18:47 [PATCH v8 00/14] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 01/14] PCI/RCEC: Add RCEC class code and extended capability Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 02/14] PCI/RCEC: Bind RCEC devices to the Root Port driver Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 03/14] PCI/RCEC: Cache RCEC capabilities in pci_init_capabilities() Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 04/14] PCI/ERR: Rename reset_link() to reset_subordinate_device() Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 05/14] PCI/ERR: Use "bridge" for clarity in pcie_do_recovery() Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 06/14] PCI/ERR: Add pci_walk_bridge() to pcie_do_recovery() Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 07/14] PCI/ERR: Limit AER resets in pcie_do_recovery() Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 08/14] PCI/AER: Extend AER error handling to RCECs Sean V Kelley 2020-10-09 21:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2020-10-09 21:54 ` Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 09/14] PCI/AER: Apply function level reset to RCiEP on fatal error Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 10/14] PCI/RCEC: Add pcie_link_rcec() to associate RCiEPs Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 11/14] PCI/RCEC: Add RCiEP's linked RCEC to AER/ERR Sean V Kelley 2020-10-09 17:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2020-10-09 18:26 ` Sean V Kelley 2020-10-09 18:34 ` Sean V Kelley [this message] 2020-10-09 18:53 ` Sean V Kelley 2020-10-09 19:48 ` Sean V Kelley 2020-10-09 21:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2020-10-09 22:07 ` Sean V Kelley 2020-10-09 23:51 ` Kelley, Sean V 2020-10-12 22:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2020-10-13 16:55 ` Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 12/14] PCI/AER: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to RCEC AER handling Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 13/14] PCI/PME: Add pcie_walk_rcec() to RCEC PME handling Sean V Kelley 2020-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v8 14/14] PCI/AER: Add RCEC AER error injection support Sean V Kelley 2020-10-09 15:53 ` [PATCH v8 00/14] Add RCEC handling to PCI/AER Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=C3CF4A15-B00B-4347-89C7-B331E17ECF69@intel.com \ --to=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \ --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \ --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \ --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \ --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com \ --cc=seanvk.dev@oregontracks.org \ --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Linux-PCI Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/0 linux-pci/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pci linux-pci/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci \ linux-pci@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index linux-pci Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-pci AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git