From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> Cc: Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, Andrew Murray <amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk>, Tom Joseph <tjoseph@cadence.com>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>, Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>, "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org" <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] PCI: endpoint: Add support to handle multiple base for mapping outbound memory Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 10:17:08 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CA+V-a8vkZwgOf8gkxWU62A3L1BTXw_y2H5MGo-7-+ad28q1tWQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <TYAPR01MB4544FDF2FEDBED104F6C6C45D8D40@TYAPR01MB4544.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> Hi Yoshihiro, Thank you for the review. On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:04 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar-san, > > Thank you for the patch! > > > From: Lad Prabhakar, Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 10:27 PM > <snip> > > @@ -109,11 +137,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_mem_init); > > */ > > void pci_epc_mem_exit(struct pci_epc *epc) > > { > > - struct pci_epc_mem *mem = epc->mem; > > + struct pci_epc_mem *mem; > > + int i; > > > > + if (!epc->num_windows) > > + return; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i <= epc->num_windows; i++) { > > I'm sorry, I overlooked when I reviewed before. > This condition should be "i < epc->num_windows". > Argh my bad, will fix it. > > + mem = epc->windows[i]; > > + kfree(mem->bitmap); > > + kfree(mem); > > + } > > + kfree(epc->windows); > > + > > + epc->windows = NULL; > > epc->mem = NULL; > > - kfree(mem->bitmap); > > - kfree(mem); > > + epc->num_windows = 0; > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_mem_exit); > > > > @@ -129,31 +168,57 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_mem_exit); > > void __iomem *pci_epc_mem_alloc_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, > > phys_addr_t *phys_addr, size_t size) > > { > > - int pageno; > > void __iomem *virt_addr = NULL; > > - struct pci_epc_mem *mem = epc->mem; > > - unsigned int page_shift = ilog2(mem->page_size); > > + struct pci_epc_mem *mem; > > + unsigned int page_shift; > > + size_t align_size; > > + int pageno; > > int order; > > + int i; > > > > - size = ALIGN(size, mem->page_size); > > - order = pci_epc_mem_get_order(mem, size); > > - > > - mutex_lock(&mem->lock); > > - pageno = bitmap_find_free_region(mem->bitmap, mem->pages, order); > > - if (pageno < 0) > > - goto ret; > > + for (i = 0; i < epc->num_windows; i++) { > > + mem = epc->windows[i]; > > + mutex_lock(&mem->lock); > > + align_size = ALIGN(size, mem->window.page_size); > > + order = pci_epc_mem_get_order(mem, align_size); > > > > - *phys_addr = mem->phys_base + ((phys_addr_t)pageno << page_shift); > > - virt_addr = ioremap(*phys_addr, size); > > - if (!virt_addr) > > - bitmap_release_region(mem->bitmap, pageno, order); > > + pageno = bitmap_find_free_region(mem->bitmap, mem->pages, > > + order); > > + if (pageno >= 0) { > > + page_shift = ilog2(mem->window.page_size); > > + *phys_addr = mem->window.phys_base + > > + ((phys_addr_t)pageno << page_shift); > > + virt_addr = ioremap(*phys_addr, align_size); > > + if (!virt_addr) > > + bitmap_release_region(mem->bitmap, > > + pageno, order); > > I'm sorry here again. But, I think we should call mutex_unlock() and "continue;" > here if ioremap() failed for trying remaining windows. What do you think? > If ioremap() has failed something has really went wrong with the system, but there is no harm in trying other windows. So Ill add the code as suggested above. Cheers, --Prabhakar > > + mutex_unlock(&mem->lock); > > + return virt_addr; > > + } > > + mutex_unlock(&mem->lock); > > + } > > > > -ret: > > - mutex_unlock(&mem->lock); > > return virt_addr; > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epc_mem_alloc_addr); > > Best regards, > Yoshihiro Shimoda >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 9:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-19 13:26 [PATCH v8 0/8] Add support for PCIe controller to work in endpoint mode on R-Car/RZ/G2x SoCs Lad Prabhakar 2020-04-19 13:26 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] PCI: rcar: Rename pcie-rcar.c to pcie-rcar-host.c Lad Prabhakar 2020-04-19 13:26 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] PCI: rcar: Move shareable code to a common file Lad Prabhakar 2020-04-19 13:26 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] PCI: rcar: Fix calculating mask for PCIEPAMR register Lad Prabhakar 2020-04-19 13:26 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] PCI: endpoint: Pass page size as argument to pci_epc_mem_init() Lad Prabhakar 2020-04-19 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] PCI: endpoint: Add support to handle multiple base for mapping outbound memory Lad Prabhakar 2020-04-20 9:04 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda 2020-04-20 9:17 ` Lad, Prabhakar [this message] 2020-04-19 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] dt-bindings: PCI: rcar: Add bindings for R-Car PCIe endpoint controller Lad Prabhakar 2020-04-19 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] PCI: rcar: Add endpoint mode support Lad Prabhakar 2020-04-21 4:08 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda 2020-04-21 8:58 ` Lad, Prabhakar 2020-04-19 13:27 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] MAINTAINERS: Add file patterns for rcar PCI device tree bindings Lad Prabhakar 2020-04-19 16:36 ` Joe Perches 2020-04-19 19:10 ` Lad, Prabhakar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CA+V-a8vkZwgOf8gkxWU62A3L1BTXw_y2H5MGo-7-+ad28q1tWQ@mail.gmail.com \ --to=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \ --cc=amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \ --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \ --cc=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \ --cc=kishon@ti.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \ --cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \ --cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \ --cc=tjoseph@cadence.com \ --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] PCI: endpoint: Add support to handle multiple base for mapping outbound memory' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).