linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/8] PCI: dwc: Implement special ISR handler for split MSI IRQ setup
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 23:29:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpqWb5=Zt0EL5WF3GuPLZL-u-G-1WPL8F6Qp2hKL1sj6Qg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220526184228.GF54904-robh@kernel.org>

On Thu, 26 May 2022 at 21:42, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 09:18:34PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > If the PCIe DWC controller uses split MSI IRQs for reporting MSI
> > vectors, it is possible to detect, which group triggered the interrupt.
> > Provide an optimized version of MSI ISR handler that will handle just a
> > single MSI group instead of handling all of them.
>
> A lot more complexity to save 7 register reads...

Thus it is a separate patch. It can be dropped w/o any issues.

>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 86 ++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > index 98a57249ecaf..2b2de517301a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > @@ -52,34 +52,42 @@ static struct msi_domain_info dw_pcie_msi_domain_info = {
> >       .chip   = &dw_pcie_msi_irq_chip,
> >  };
> >
> > +static inline irqreturn_t dw_handle_single_msi_group(struct pcie_port *pp, int i)
> > +{
> > +     int pos;
> > +     unsigned long val;
> > +     u32 status;
> > +     struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > +
> > +     status = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS +
> > +                                (i * MSI_REG_CTRL_BLOCK_SIZE));
> > +     if (!status)
> > +             return IRQ_NONE;
> > +
> > +     val = status;
> > +     pos = 0;
> > +     while ((pos = find_next_bit(&val, MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL,
> > +                                 pos)) != MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL) {
>
> for_each_set_bit() doesn't work here?

Good question, I just moved the existing DWC code.

>
> > +             generic_handle_domain_irq(pp->irq_domain,
> > +                                       (i * MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL) +
> > +                                       pos);
> > +             pos++;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* MSI int handler */
> >  irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp)
> >  {
> > -     int i, pos;
> > -     unsigned long val;
> > -     u32 status, num_ctrls;
> > +     int i;
> > +     u32 num_ctrls;
> >       irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> > -     struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> >
> >       num_ctrls = pp->num_vectors / MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL;
> >
> > -     for (i = 0; i < num_ctrls; i++) {
> > -             status = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS +
> > -                                        (i * MSI_REG_CTRL_BLOCK_SIZE));
> > -             if (!status)
> > -                     continue;
> > -
> > -             ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> > -             val = status;
> > -             pos = 0;
> > -             while ((pos = find_next_bit(&val, MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL,
> > -                                         pos)) != MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL) {
> > -                     generic_handle_domain_irq(pp->irq_domain,
> > -                                               (i * MAX_MSI_IRQS_PER_CTRL) +
> > -                                               pos);
> > -                     pos++;
> > -             }
> > -     }
> > +     for (i = 0; i < num_ctrls; i++)
> > +             ret |= dw_handle_single_msi_group(pp, i);
> >
> >       return ret;
> >  }



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-26 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-23 18:18 [PATCH v12 0/8] PCI: qcom: Fix higher MSI vectors handling Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-23 18:18 ` [PATCH v12 1/8] PCI: qcom: Revert "PCI: qcom: Add support for handling MSIs from 8 endpoints" Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-23 18:18 ` [PATCH v12 2/8] PCI: dwc: Correct msi_irq condition in dw_pcie_free_msi() Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-06-02 13:42   ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-23 18:18 ` [PATCH v12 3/8] PCI: dwc: Convert msi_irq to the array Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-26 18:05   ` Rob Herring
2022-06-02 13:45   ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-23 18:18 ` [PATCH v12 4/8] PCI: dwc: split MSI IRQ parsing/allocation to a separate function Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-26 18:09   ` Rob Herring
2022-05-26 20:57     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-06-02 13:55   ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-23 18:18 ` [PATCH v12 5/8] PCI: dwc: Handle MSIs routed to multiple GIC interrupts Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-26 18:17   ` Rob Herring
2022-06-02 14:18   ` Johan Hovold
2022-05-23 18:18 ` [PATCH v12 6/8] PCI: dwc: Implement special ISR handler for split MSI IRQ setup Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-24  0:18   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-26 18:42   ` Rob Herring
2022-05-26 20:29     ` Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2022-05-23 18:18 ` [PATCH v12 7/8] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Support additional MSI interrupts Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-26 18:19   ` Rob Herring
2022-05-23 18:18 ` [PATCH v12 8/8] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: provide " Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-24 14:52 ` [PATCH v12 0/8] PCI: qcom: Fix higher MSI vectors handling Bjorn Helgaas
2022-05-24 16:17   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-05-24 16:35     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-06-02 14:21 ` Johan Hovold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA8EJpqWb5=Zt0EL5WF3GuPLZL-u-G-1WPL8F6Qp2hKL1sj6Qg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).