linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thokala, Srikanth" <srikanth.thokala@intel.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: "bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" 
	<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"mgross@linux.intel.com" <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	"Raja Subramanian,
	Lakshmi Bai"  <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com>,
	"Sangannavar,
	Mallikarjunappa"  <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com>,
	"kw@linux.com" <kw@linux.com>, "maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>,
	"gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 2/2] PCI: keembay: Add support for Intel Keem Bay
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 05:28:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB559554BEE78B87C4381A456B857C9@PH0PR11MB5595.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210329130725.GA4983@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

Hi Lorenzo,

Thank you for your time in reviewing the patch.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 6:37 PM
> To: Thokala, Srikanth <srikanth.thokala@intel.com>
> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com;
> mgross@linux.intel.com; Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai
> <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa
> <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com>; kw@linux.com; maz@kernel.org;
> gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] PCI: keembay: Add support for Intel Keem Bay
> 
> [+ Marc, Gustavo]
> 
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 07:47:57AM +0530, srikanth.thokala@intel.com
> wrote:
> > +static irqreturn_t keembay_pcie_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > +{
> > +	struct keembay_pcie *pcie = arg;
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> > +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> > +	u32 val, mask, status;
> > +
> > +	val = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
> > +	mask = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
> > +
> > +	status = val & mask;
> > +	if (!status)
> > +		return IRQ_NONE;
> > +
> > +	if (status & MSI_CTRL_INT)
> > +		dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
> > +
> > +	writel(status, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
> > +
> > +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int keembay_pcie_setup_irq(struct keembay_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> > +	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > +	int irq, ret;
> > +
> > +	irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "pcie");
> > +	if (irq < 0)
> > +		return irq;
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, keembay_pcie_irq_handler,
> > +			       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD, "pcie", pcie);
> Mmm. What's this "pcie" line is actually signaling ? It looks like
> MSIs are reported through it and for that AFAIK the dwc core should
> set-up a chained IRQ in the core code unless the pcie_port->msi_irq is
> set (which is what this driver does).

Yes, your understanding is correct.  This ISR will handle MSI interrupts.

> 
> If DWC core code can't handle this host controller MSI logic, the
> MSI handling should be setup as a chained IRQ, not an IRQ action,
> this is an IRQ layering issue/abuse that came up in the past,
> I don't want to add more core that relies on it.

Ok, I see your point.
I will make necessary changes for the next version of the patch.

Thanks!
Srikanth

> 
> Lorenzo
> 
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to request IRQ: %d\n", ret);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void keembay_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > +	struct keembay_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> > +
> > +	writel(EDMA_INT_EN, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int keembay_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> > +				     enum pci_epc_irq_type type,
> > +				     u16 interrupt_num)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > +
> > +	switch (type) {
> > +	case PCI_EPC_IRQ_LEGACY:
> > +		/* Legacy interrupts are not supported in Keem Bay */
> > +		dev_err(pci->dev, "Legacy IRQ is not supported\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	case PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSI:
> > +		return dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(ep, func_no, interrupt_num);
> > +	case PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSIX:
> > +		return dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(ep, func_no, interrupt_num);
> > +	default:
> > +		dev_err(pci->dev, "Unknown IRQ type %d\n", type);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct pci_epc_features keembay_pcie_epc_features = {
> > +	.linkup_notifier	= false,
> > +	.msi_capable		= true,
> > +	.msix_capable		= true,
> > +	.reserved_bar		= BIT(BAR_1) | BIT(BAR_3) | BIT(BAR_5),
> > +	.bar_fixed_64bit	= BIT(BAR_0) | BIT(BAR_2) | BIT(BAR_4),
> > +	.align			= SZ_16K,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct pci_epc_features *
> > +keembay_pcie_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> > +{
> > +	return &keembay_pcie_epc_features;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops keembay_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > +	.ep_init	= keembay_pcie_ep_init,
> > +	.raise_irq	= keembay_pcie_ep_raise_irq,
> > +	.get_features	= keembay_pcie_get_features,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops keembay_pcie_host_ops = {
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int keembay_pcie_add_pcie_port(struct keembay_pcie *pcie,
> > +				      struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> > +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	u32 val;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	pp->ops = &keembay_pcie_host_ops;
> > +	pp->msi_irq = -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	pcie->reset = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(pcie->reset))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(pcie->reset);
> > +
> > +	ret = keembay_pcie_probe_clocks(pcie);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	val = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_PCIE_PHY_CNTL);
> > +	val |= PHY0_SRAM_BYPASS;
> > +	writel(val, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_PCIE_PHY_CNTL);
> > +
> > +	writel(PCIE_DEVICE_TYPE, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_PCIE_CFG);
> > +
> > +	ret = keembay_pcie_pll_init(pcie);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	val = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_PCIE_CFG);
> > +	writel(val | PCIE_RSTN, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_PCIE_CFG);
> > +	keembay_ep_reset_deassert(pcie);
> > +
> > +	ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		keembay_ep_reset_assert(pcie);
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize host: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	val = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
> > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
> > +		val |= MSI_CTRL_INT_EN;
> > +	writel(val, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int keembay_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	const struct keembay_pcie_of_data *data;
> > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	struct keembay_pcie *pcie;
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > +	enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	data = device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +	if (!data)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	mode = (enum dw_pcie_device_mode)data->mode;
> > +
> > +	pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!pcie)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	pci = &pcie->pci;
> > +	pci->dev = dev;
> > +	pci->ops = &keembay_pcie_ops;
> > +
> > +	pcie->mode = mode;
> > +
> > +	pcie->apb_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "apb");
> > +	if (IS_ERR(pcie->apb_base))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(pcie->apb_base);
> > +
> > +	ret = keembay_pcie_setup_irq(pcie);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> > +
> > +	switch (pcie->mode) {
> > +	case DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE:
> > +		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_KEEMBAY_HOST))
> > +			return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +		return keembay_pcie_add_pcie_port(pcie, pdev);
> > +	case DW_PCIE_EP_TYPE:
> > +		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_KEEMBAY_EP))
> > +			return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +		pci->ep.ops = &keembay_pcie_ep_ops;
> > +		return dw_pcie_ep_init(&pci->ep);
> > +	default:
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Invalid device type %d\n", pcie->mode);
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct keembay_pcie_of_data keembay_pcie_rc_of_data = {
> > +	.mode = DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct keembay_pcie_of_data keembay_pcie_ep_of_data = {
> > +	.mode = DW_PCIE_EP_TYPE,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id keembay_pcie_of_match[] = {
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "intel,keembay-pcie",
> > +		.data = &keembay_pcie_rc_of_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "intel,keembay-pcie-ep",
> > +		.data = &keembay_pcie_ep_of_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{}
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver keembay_pcie_driver = {
> > +	.driver = {
> > +		.name = "keembay-pcie",
> > +		.of_match_table = keembay_pcie_of_match,
> > +		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> > +	},
> > +	.probe  = keembay_pcie_probe,
> > +};
> > +builtin_platform_driver(keembay_pcie_driver);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >

      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-31  5:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-18  2:17 [PATCH v8 0/2] PCI: keembay: Add support for Intel Keem Bay srikanth.thokala
2021-02-18  2:17 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: Add Intel Keem Bay PCIe controller srikanth.thokala
2021-02-18  2:17 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] PCI: keembay: Add support for Intel Keem Bay srikanth.thokala
2021-03-08 16:54   ` Thokala, Srikanth
2021-03-29 13:07   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-03-31  5:28     ` Thokala, Srikanth [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB559554BEE78B87C4381A456B857C9@PH0PR11MB5595.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=srikanth.thokala@intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).