linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thokala, Srikanth" <srikanth.thokala@intel.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"maz@kernel.org" <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" 
	<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"mgross@linux.intel.com" <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	"Raja Subramanian,
	Lakshmi Bai"  <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com>,
	"Sangannavar,
	Mallikarjunappa"  <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com>,
	"kw@linux.com" <kw@linux.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 2/2] PCI: keembay: Add support for Intel Keem Bay
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 03:23:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB559558D60263F29C168E6C5185069@PH0PR11MB5595.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210621162506.GA31511@lpieralisi>

Hi Lorenzo,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 10:23 PM
> To: Thokala, Srikanth <srikanth.thokala@intel.com>; maz@kernel.org
> Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com;
> mgross@linux.intel.com; Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai
> <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa
> <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com>; kw@linux.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] PCI: keembay: Add support for Intel Keem Bay
> 
> [+Marc]
> 
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 09:10:44PM +0530, srikanth.thokala@intel.com
> wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > +static void keembay_pcie_msi_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > +	struct keembay_pcie *pcie = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> > +	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> > +	u32 val, mask, status;
> > +	struct pcie_port *pp;
> > +
> > +	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> > +
> > +	pp = &pcie->pci.pp;
> > +	val = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
> > +	mask = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
> > +
> > +	status = val & mask;
> > +
> > +	if (status & MSI_CTRL_INT) {
> > +		dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
> > +		writel(status, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int keembay_pcie_setup_msi_irq(struct keembay_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> > +	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > +	int irq;
> > +
> > +	irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "pcie");
> > +	if (irq < 0)
> > +		return irq;
> > +
> > +	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, keembay_pcie_msi_irq_handler,
> > +					 pcie);
> > +
> 
> Ok this is yet another DWC MSI incantation and given that Marc worked
> hard consolidating them let's have a look before we merge it.
> 
> IIUC - this IP relies on the DWC logic to handle MSIs + custom
> registers to detect a pending MSI IRQ because the logic in
> dw_chained_msi_irq() is *not* enough so you have to register
> a driver specific chained handler. This looks similar to the dra7xx
> driver MSI handling but I am not entirely convinced it is needed.
> 
> I assume this code in keembay_pcie_msi_irq_handler() is required
> owing to additional IP logic on top of the standard DWC IP, in
> particular the PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_STATUS write to "clear" the
> IRQ.
> 
> We need more insights before merging it so please provide them.
> 
> pp = &pcie->pci.pp;
> val = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
> mask = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
> 
> status = val & mask;
> 
> if (status & MSI_CTRL_INT) {
> 	dw_handle_msi_irq(pp);
> 	writel(status, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_STATUS);
> }

Yes, your understanding is correct.

Additional registers PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_ENABLE/_STATUS are provided
by IP to control the interrupts.

To receive MSI interrupts, SW must enable bit '8' of _ENABLE register.
And once a MSI is raised by the End point, bit '8' of _STATUS register
will be set and it needs to be cleared after servicing the interrupt.

Thanks!
Srikanth

> 
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
> 
> > +static void keembay_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > +	struct keembay_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> > +
> > +	writel(EDMA_INT_EN, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int keembay_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> > +				     enum pci_epc_irq_type type,
> > +				     u16 interrupt_num)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > +
> > +	switch (type) {
> > +	case PCI_EPC_IRQ_LEGACY:
> > +		/* Legacy interrupts are not supported in Keem Bay */
> > +		dev_err(pci->dev, "Legacy IRQ is not supported\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	case PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSI:
> > +		return dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(ep, func_no, interrupt_num);
> > +	case PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSIX:
> > +		return dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(ep, func_no, interrupt_num);
> > +	default:
> > +		dev_err(pci->dev, "Unknown IRQ type %d\n", type);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct pci_epc_features keembay_pcie_epc_features = {
> > +	.linkup_notifier	= false,
> > +	.msi_capable		= true,
> > +	.msix_capable		= true,
> > +	.reserved_bar		= BIT(BAR_1) | BIT(BAR_3) | BIT(BAR_5),
> > +	.bar_fixed_64bit	= BIT(BAR_0) | BIT(BAR_2) | BIT(BAR_4),
> > +	.align			= SZ_16K,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct pci_epc_features *
> > +keembay_pcie_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> > +{
> > +	return &keembay_pcie_epc_features;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops keembay_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > +	.ep_init	= keembay_pcie_ep_init,
> > +	.raise_irq	= keembay_pcie_ep_raise_irq,
> > +	.get_features	= keembay_pcie_get_features,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops keembay_pcie_host_ops = {
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int keembay_pcie_add_pcie_port(struct keembay_pcie *pcie,
> > +				      struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
> > +	struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	u32 val;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	pp->ops = &keembay_pcie_host_ops;
> > +	pp->msi_irq = -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	ret = keembay_pcie_setup_msi_irq(pcie);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	pcie->reset = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(pcie->reset))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(pcie->reset);
> > +
> > +	ret = keembay_pcie_probe_clocks(pcie);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	val = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_PCIE_PHY_CNTL);
> > +	val |= PHY0_SRAM_BYPASS;
> > +	writel(val, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_PCIE_PHY_CNTL);
> > +
> > +	writel(PCIE_DEVICE_TYPE, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_PCIE_CFG);
> > +
> > +	ret = keembay_pcie_pll_init(pcie);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	val = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_PCIE_CFG);
> > +	writel(val | PCIE_RSTN, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_PCIE_CFG);
> > +	keembay_ep_reset_deassert(pcie);
> > +
> > +	ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		keembay_ep_reset_assert(pcie);
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize host: %d\n", ret);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	val = readl(pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
> > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
> > +		val |= MSI_CTRL_INT_EN;
> > +	writel(val, pcie->apb_base + PCIE_REGS_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int keembay_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	const struct keembay_pcie_of_data *data;
> > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	struct keembay_pcie *pcie;
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > +	enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode;
> > +
> > +	data = device_get_match_data(dev);
> > +	if (!data)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	mode = (enum dw_pcie_device_mode)data->mode;
> > +
> > +	pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!pcie)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	pci = &pcie->pci;
> > +	pci->dev = dev;
> > +	pci->ops = &keembay_pcie_ops;
> > +
> > +	pcie->mode = mode;
> > +
> > +	pcie->apb_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "apb");
> > +	if (IS_ERR(pcie->apb_base))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(pcie->apb_base);
> > +
> > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> > +
> > +	switch (pcie->mode) {
> > +	case DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE:
> > +		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_KEEMBAY_HOST))
> > +			return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +		return keembay_pcie_add_pcie_port(pcie, pdev);
> > +	case DW_PCIE_EP_TYPE:
> > +		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_KEEMBAY_EP))
> > +			return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +		pci->ep.ops = &keembay_pcie_ep_ops;
> > +		return dw_pcie_ep_init(&pci->ep);
> > +	default:
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Invalid device type %d\n", pcie->mode);
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct keembay_pcie_of_data keembay_pcie_rc_of_data = {
> > +	.mode = DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct keembay_pcie_of_data keembay_pcie_ep_of_data = {
> > +	.mode = DW_PCIE_EP_TYPE,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id keembay_pcie_of_match[] = {
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "intel,keembay-pcie",
> > +		.data = &keembay_pcie_rc_of_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{
> > +		.compatible = "intel,keembay-pcie-ep",
> > +		.data = &keembay_pcie_ep_of_data,
> > +	},
> > +	{}
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver keembay_pcie_driver = {
> > +	.driver = {
> > +		.name = "keembay-pcie",
> > +		.of_match_table = keembay_pcie_of_match,
> > +		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> > +	},
> > +	.probe  = keembay_pcie_probe,
> > +};
> > +builtin_platform_driver(keembay_pcie_driver);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-25  3:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-07 15:40 [PATCH v10 0/2] PCI: keembay: Add support for Intel Keem Bay srikanth.thokala
2021-06-07 15:40 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: Add Intel Keem Bay PCIe controller srikanth.thokala
2021-06-07 15:40 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] PCI: keembay: Add support for Intel Keem Bay srikanth.thokala
2021-06-15 21:09   ` Rob Herring
2021-06-16  7:49     ` Thokala, Srikanth
2021-06-21 16:53   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-06-25  3:23     ` Thokala, Srikanth [this message]
2021-07-07 11:54       ` Thokala, Srikanth
2021-07-26  6:30         ` Thokala, Srikanth
2021-07-26  8:00       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-27 16:26         ` Thokala, Srikanth
2021-06-15 14:38 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] " Thokala, Srikanth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB559558D60263F29C168E6C5185069@PH0PR11MB5595.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=srikanth.thokala@intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).