linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: rcar: Fix missing MACCTLR register setting in initialize sequence
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 09:26:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <TYAPR01MB45448947CB09B1A8AC1774A8D87E0@TYAPR01MB4544.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWrQs49BFaN49odrG3k91d2rsRLPpCSvDcj5DhKeHPPaA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Geert-san,

Thank you for your review!

> From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2019 5:50 PM
> 
> Hi Shimoda-san,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:48 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda
> <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote:
> > According to the R-Car Gen2/3 manual, "Be sure to write the initial
> > value (= H'80FF 0000) to MACCTLR before enabling PCIETCTLR.CFINIT".
> > To avoid unexpected behaviors, this patch fixes it. Note that
> > the SPCHG bit of MACCTLR register description said "Only writing 1
> > is valid and writing 0 is invalid" but this "invalid" means
> > "ignored", not "prohibited". So, any documentation conflict doesn't
> > exist about writing the MACCTLR register.
> >
> > Reported-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
> > Fixes: c25da4778803 ("PCI: rcar: Add Renesas R-Car PCIe driver")
> > Fixes: be20bbcb0a8c ("PCI: rcar: Add the initialization of PCIe link in resume_noirq()")
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.2+
> > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> > @@ -91,8 +91,12 @@
> >  #define  LINK_SPEED_2_5GTS     (1 << 16)
> >  #define  LINK_SPEED_5_0GTS     (2 << 16)
> >  #define MACCTLR                        0x011058
> > +#define  MACCTLR_RESERVED23_16 GENMASK(23, 16)
> 
> MACCTLR_NFTS_MASK?

I should have said on previous email thread [1] though,
since SH7786 PCIE HW manual said NFTS (NFTS) but
any R-Car SoCs' HW manual said just Reserved with H'FF,
so that I prefer to describe RESERVED instead of NFTS.
Do you agree?

[1]
https://marc.info/?l=linux-renesas-soc&m=157242422327368&w=2

> >  #define  SPEED_CHANGE          BIT(24)
> >  #define  SCRAMBLE_DISABLE      BIT(27)
> > +#define  LTSMDIS               BIT(31)
> > +        /* Be sure to write the initial value (H'80FF 0000) to MACCTLR */
> 
> Do we need this comment?

It's a little redundant. So, I'll remove it.

> > +#define  MACCTLR_INIT_VAL      (LTSMDIS | MACCTLR_RESERVED23_16)
> >  #define PMSR                   0x01105c
> >  #define MACS2R                 0x011078
> >  #define MACCGSPSETR            0x011084
> 
> With the above fixed:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Thanks!

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05  2:48 [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: rcar: Fix missing MACCTLR register setting (take2) Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-11-05  2:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] Revert "PCI: rcar: Fix missing MACCTLR register setting in rcar_pcie_hw_init()" Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-11-05  8:46   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-05  2:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: rcar: Fix missing MACCTLR register setting in initialize sequence Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-11-05  8:50   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-05  9:26     ` Yoshihiro Shimoda [this message]
2019-11-05  9:52       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-05 10:11         ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-11-05 10:26           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-11-05 10:33             ` Yoshihiro Shimoda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=TYAPR01MB45448947CB09B1A8AC1774A8D87E0@TYAPR01MB4544.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).