Re: [PATCH V5] PCI: rcar: Use runtime PM to control controller clock

[Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>]

On 05/01/2018 12:55 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 06:17:04PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 04/10/2018 05:28 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>>>> rcar_pcie_get_resources() is called while the device is
>>>>>> runtime-enabled/resumed,
>>>>>> pci_free_resource_list() is called while the device is runtime-disabled.
>>>
>>> rcar_pcie_get_resources() is NOT a pair function for
>>> pci_free_resource_list() . rcar_pcie_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() is a
>>> pair function for pci_free_resource_list().
>>>
>>> rcar_pcie_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() calls
>>> of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() internally, so every single function
>>> called after successful call of rcar_pcie_parse_request_of_pci_ranges()
>>> must call pci_free_resource_list().
>>>
>>> Both of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() and pci_free_resource_list() are
>>> called with runtime PM disabled.
>>>
>>> The naming of the functions is confusing though.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks everyone for their efforts in preparing/reviewing this patch.
>>
>> It seems there are some differences of opinion on how best to handle the
>> error paths but unlike earlier versions this one seems correct to me. If
>> that turns out to be false we can address it. But I don't think its likely
>> things will be enhanced by continuing this review.
>>
>> Lorenzo, please consider taking this patch in its current form.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> 
> Applied to pci/rcar for v4.18, thanks.

Is there any reason why this patch isnt in next yet ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut