linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Miroshnichenko <s.miroshnichenko@yadro.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	'Bjorn Helgaas' <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux@yadro.com" <linux@yadro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 09/21] PCI: Mark immovable BARs with PCI_FIXED
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:39:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6157813-07b7-61af-242e-71870d0b0043@yadro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e3e163cbf35446ea575bb7fae1912be@AcuMS.aculab.com>

On 3/27/19 8:03 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas
>> Sent: 26 March 2019 20:29
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:31:10PM +0300, Sergey Miroshnichenko wrote:
>>> If a PCIe device driver doesn't yet have support for movable BARs,
>>> mark device's BARs with IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED.
>>
>> I'm hesitant about using IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED for this purpose.  That
>> was originally added to describe resources that can not be changed
>> because they're hardwired in the device, e.g., legacy resources and
>> Enhanced Allocation resources.
>>
>> In general, I think the bits in res->flags should tell us things about
>> the hardware.  This particular use would be something about the
>> *driver*, and I think we should figure that out by looking at
>> dev->driver.
> 
> There will also be drivers that don't support BARs being moved,
> but may be in a state (ie not actually open) where they can go
> through a remove-rescan sequence to allow the BAR be moved.
> 
> This might even be true if the open count is non-zero.
> 
> 	David
> 
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
> 

This approach with IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED was used because struct resource doesn't have a
pointer to its device (and so to its driver). But now, after you have mentioned that, I
can see that in every place I use the FIXED flag to mark the immovable resources - also
has the according struct pci_dev *dev nearby.

So, replacing every

    if (r->flags & IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED)

with

    if (!dev->driver->rescan_prepare)

or something like

    if (pci_dev_movable_bars_capable(dev))

will reduce this huge patchset a little, and also makes irrelevant the case I've
completely forgotten about - IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED must be unset on removing (rmmod) the
"immovable" driver.

Thanks a lot! I'll rework the changes in this way and resend it as v5.

Serge

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-27 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-11 13:31 [PATCH RFC v4 00/21] PCI: Allow BAR movement during hotplug Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 01/21] PCI: Fix writing invalid BARs during pci_restore_state() Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 14:02   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/21] PCI: Fix race condition in pci_enable/disable_device() Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 19:00   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-27 17:11     ` Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/21] PCI: Enable bridge's I/O and MEM access for hotplugged devices Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 19:13   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-27 17:13     ` Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 04/21] PCI: Define PCI-specific version of the release_child_resources() Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/21] PCI: hotplug: Add a flag for the movable BARs feature Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 19:24   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-27 17:16     ` Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 06/21] PCI: Pause the devices with movable BARs during rescan Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 07/21] PCI: Wake up bridges during rescan when movable BARs enabled Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 19:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 08/21] nvme-pci: Handle movable BARs Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 20:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-27 17:30     ` Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 09/21] PCI: Mark immovable BARs with PCI_FIXED Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 20:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-27 17:03     ` David Laight
2019-03-27 17:39       ` Sergey Miroshnichenko [this message]
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 10/21] PCI: Fix assigning of fixed prefetchable resources Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 20:37   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 11/21] PCI: Release and reassign the root bridge resources during rescan Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 20:41   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-27 17:40     ` Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 12/21] PCI: Don't allow hotplugged devices to steal resources Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 20:55   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-27 18:02     ` Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 13/21] PCI: Include fixed BARs into the bus size calculating Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 14/21] PCI: Don't reserve memory for hotplug when enabled movable BARs Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 20:57   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 15/21] PCI: Allow the failed resources to be reassigned later Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 20:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 16/21] PCI: Calculate fixed areas of bridge windows based on fixed BARs Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 17/21] PCI: Calculate boundaries for bridge windows Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 21:01   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 18/21] PCI: Make sure bridge windows include their fixed BARs Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 19/21] PCI: Prioritize fixed BAR assigning over the movable ones Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 20/21] PCI: pciehp: Add support for the movable BARs feature Sergey Miroshnichenko
2019-03-26 21:11   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-03-11 13:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 21/21] powerpc/pci: Fix crash with enabled movable BARs Sergey Miroshnichenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f6157813-07b7-61af-242e-71870d0b0043@yadro.com \
    --to=s.miroshnichenko@yadro.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@yadro.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).